On 04/04/2012 01:27 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I suggest you to go here
http://news.lilynet.net/IMG/pdf/Coronation_Mass_-_Credo_2-15-33_marked.pdf
and check whether yellow, orange and brown markings surprise you or
not. That could be a good test.
Thanks. I do recognize for most of those marked elements that
something's a little "off" -- moreso with the slurs/ties so perhaps I
will look into focusing on those.
I don't currently have further specific ideas beyond the outline given on
the LilyPond website, but any insights into these projects, and how I should
best form a GSoC proposal, would definitely be welcome.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:47 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
I'd first formulate the problem in aesthetic terms
(i.e. "The literature shows that beams usually do X, whereas LilyPond
currently does Y") and then read beam-quanting.cc to see why lilypond does Y
and what types of modifications would be necessary to arrive at X.
I think there might not be enough time to define all specific changes
that are needed in beam positions or tie and slur shapes before
application deadline - it's a lot of work. However, you can try
describing some general changes, for example:
Yes, although I'll try to outline some significant changes, I think most
of the work collecting specific problems and examples from the
literature will have to take place in the early stages of the project.
I'll give some thought to how to approach that process.
Thank you both for your help and insights -- I'll hope to put together
an application (while still keeping up with school etc. this week...)
Corey
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
