Re: Check in Texinfo 2012-07-03.16 (issue 6374068)
On 2012/07/18 12:40:12, lemzwerg wrote: I'm currently in Japan, with bad internet access (and additionally, I can only use the web interface for writing emails, which I heartily dislike, since SMTP doesn't work here in the hotel for yet unknown reasons), so it will take some time until I'm able to test this and communicate with the lilypond community again. Sorry for this delay. Well, in that case I'll just go for it. I suppose we'll get enough of a shake-down period to to be sure that the manuals did not change for the worse. http://codereview.appspot.com/6374068/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Check in Texinfo 2012-07-03.16 (issue 6374068)
http://codereview.appspot.com/6374068/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Check in Texinfo 2012-07-03.16 (issue 6374068)
I'm currently in Japan, with bad internet access (and additionally, I can only use the web interface for writing emails, which I heartily dislike, since SMTP doesn't work here in the hotel for yet unknown reasons), so it will take some time until I'm able to test this and communicate with the lilypond community again. Sorry for this delay. http://codereview.appspot.com/6374068/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Check in Texinfo 2012-07-03.16 (issue 6374068)
Reviewers: Graham Percival, Message: On 2012/07/15 01:45:06, Graham Percival wrote: I can't see any diff on rietveld, but presumably there's so much being changed that a diff wouldn't be helpful anyway. If a "make doc" looks good to you, and you're willing to handle any potential fall-out from breakage at this point in the release cycle, then as far as I'm concerned you can push directly to staging. OTOH, if you'd rather wait until 2.17, that's cool too. Downloading the raw patch works, and so does looking at the dev/texinfo branch in git I uploaded the changes two times without success: I have no idea what makes Rietveld go wrong here. The indexes look ok to me. Werner claimed that this Texinfo version would make it possible to improve formatting. If 2.16 comes with a better printed manual, that's not wrong. I have not seen positive evidence to this effect, or more specific information about what would be needed to make use of the additional possibilities, and who would do the work. Description: Check in Texinfo 2012-07-03.16 Fix for indexing macros. Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/6374068/ Affected files: M tex/texinfo.tex ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Check in Texinfo 2012-07-03.16 (issue 6374068)
I can't see any diff on rietveld, but presumably there's so much being changed that a diff wouldn't be helpful anyway. If a "make doc" looks good to you, and you're willing to handle any potential fall-out from breakage at this point in the release cycle, then as far as I'm concerned you can push directly to staging. OTOH, if you'd rather wait until 2.17, that's cool too. http://codereview.appspot.com/6374068/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
