Re: getting rid of ' and , in older scores
jEdit, or any decent editor for that matter, has a 'search/replace' function. Can't you simply search for ' and , and replace with nothing? This would cost you a few seconds per file. I imagine that you could also use sed to do this even faster. -David Father Gordon Gilbert wrote: Hi all, I've quite a number of older scores I've worked on over the years, starting with version 2.2.0 (and some from Mutopia even older than that. I have successfully used convert-ly on them to bring syntax up-to-date. But I did many of them before \relative was as easy-to-use as it is now -- even just using ' and '' and , and ,, to indicate octave ranges. I'd like to put \relative at the top of all my part sections, and delete all the octave markers. Is there any *elegant* way to go through these scores and eliminate all of the ' and , without deleting each and every one? I'm using LilyPond 2.12.1 on either Windows XP Home or Ubuntu Jaunty, with jEdit 4.3pre16 and LilyPondTool. I always appreciate the valuable advice see on this list. Blessings, Gordon+ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: SacredHarpHeads: possible solution to major/minor problem
I think it is fair to say that in older Sacred Harp music, there are
never accidentals. But they do happen occasionally. It it is only in
minor keys that the 6th degree is raised half a step without the
accidental reporting it.
Btw, great Scheme hackery, I knew there must be something like that!
Mark, could I pay you $100 to implement something that fits the bill for
sacred harp minor keys? If we need to negotiate, let's do it in private
email. The major keys are as normal.
Ted
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:59:51PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Mark Polesky wrote:
Are accidentals *ever* printed next to the notes in Sacred Harp?
If not, then all you need to do is this:
\version 2.13.1
suppressAllAccidentals = \set Staff.autoAccidentals =
#`(Staff ,(lambda (context pitch barnum position) '(#f . #f)))
\relative {
\key d \minor
\suppressAllAccidentals
\sacredHarpHeads
d e f g a b c d
}
If it's a hard and fast rule that there are never accidentals
except in the key-signature, I might propose that the
indiscriminate suppression of all accidentals be incorporated
into the \sacredHarpHeads command.
If accidentals are printed next to notes *some* of the time,
then it gets trickier. Let me know.
Thanks for this, Mark. I'm not a Sacret Harp guy and don't really know
whether there are ever accidentals, but if they're not, then your
solution above is good, with the exception that the key still (I think)
has to be called by the relative major so that the shapes are applied to
the right scale degrees. This code produces the right appearance and
MIDI output (confirm this, Tim?):
\version 2.12.2
suppressAllAccidentals =
\set Staff.autoAccidentals =
#`(Staff ,(lambda (context pitch barnum position) '(#f . #f)))
\score {
\relative c' {
\sacredHarpHeads
\suppressAllAccidentals
\key f \major
d e f g a b c d
}
\midi {}
\layout {}
}
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
There's a party in your skull. And you're invited!
Name:Ted Walther
Phone: 604-755-7732
Skype: tederific
Email: t...@reactor-core.org
Address: 1755 246 St, LANGLEY BC V2Z1G4
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Advanced (web) LilyPond usage for multiple aut hors?
Well using commercial source control systems for handling lilypond projects seems quite odd. A wiki has many advantages to simple version control, though you could write a client that supports preview, multiple editions etc. But that would be a lot easier on a wiki platform. Original message From: Peter Chubb l...@chubb.wattle.id.au Sent: 19 Jun 2009 14:22 +10:00 To: Bertalan Fodor lilypondt...@organum.hu Cc: MonAmiPierrot pierofaust...@hotmail.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Advanced (web) LilyPond usage for multiple authors? Bertalan == Bertalan Fodor lilypondt...@organum.hu writes: Bertalan A wiki would be perfect for this purpose I think. If the Bertalan extension for the wiki is smart enough, it can generate Bertalan various outputs. Bertalan MonAmiPierrot írta: Hello all, just some difficoult (but not stupid, I hope) questions. I talked about LilyPond in a conference on music edition and critical editions. With my surprise, some musicologists (some of which don't even use Finale!) asked me if LilyPond could be used in bigger critical editions projects (e.g., an opera) where multiple editors are involved. These editors would be: 1- the copyst who does the big physical job of writing down the code 2- the main critical editor 3- some expert revisor 4- the final editor who cares about layout (and don't forget at point 0- : the orginal author!) I'd prefer to use a source code control system for this kind of collaboration. Because LilyPond is text based, things like Mercurial, Perforce, etc., work really well to allow collaborative work, and to track who did what. -- Dr Peter Chubb peter DOT chubb AT nicta.com.au http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au ERTOS within National ICT Australia Kernel Engineering Group (KEG): Where Systems Brew. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: tablature.ly - please test and comment
David Stocker wrote: I've got some things typed out, but I still need to write explanations for the placement and display of objects, and suggestions for the program behavior. As soon as I have those written out, I'll post the first batch. I'll try to get it done today or tomorrow. David Maybe this weekend? ;) Regards, \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: getting rid of ' and , in older scores
But if you remove all instances of ' and , then you're assuming that all notes are less than a fifth away from the preceding note - most unlikely. Nick -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David Bobroff Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 3:58 PM To: Father Gordon Gilbert Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: getting rid of ' and , in older scores jEdit, or any decent editor for that matter, has a 'search/replace' function. Can't you simply search for ' and , and replace with nothing? This would cost you a few seconds per file. I imagine that you could also use sed to do this even faster. -David Father Gordon Gilbert wrote: Hi all, I've quite a number of older scores I've worked on over the years, starting with version 2.2.0 (and some from Mutopia even older than that. I have successfully used convert-ly on them to bring syntax up-to-date. But I did many of them before \relative was as easy-to-use as it is now -- even just using ' and '' and , and ,, to indicate octave ranges. I'd like to put \relative at the top of all my part sections, and delete all the octave markers. Is there any *elegant* way to go through these scores and eliminate all of the ' and , without deleting each and every one? I'm using LilyPond 2.12.1 on either Windows XP Home or Ubuntu Jaunty, with jEdit 4.3pre16 and LilyPondTool. I always appreciate the valuable advice see on this list. Blessings, Gordon+ - --- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.79/2186 - Release Date: 06/18/09 17:59:00 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Advanced (web) LilyPond usage for multiple authors?
I'm sorry I can't help on this level cause I have little-to-no knowledge on how all of this works. If you know of something in the web that can be taken as an example (I just found out a web-based LaTeX project http://code.google.com/p/latex-lab/ but still under development) could you give me the link? Thanks H. P.S. A very simple author/version control could be enough for 99% of needs if other 2 points are available in some way. Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: Well using commercial source control systems for handling lilypond projects seems quite odd. A wiki has many advantages to simple version control, though you could write a client that supports preview, multiple editions etc. But that would be a lot easier on a wiki platform. Original message From: Peter Chubb l...@chubb.wattle.id.au Sent: 19 Jun 2009 14:22 +10:00 To: Bertalan Fodor lilypondt...@organum.hu Cc: MonAmiPierrot pierofaust...@hotmail.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Advanced (web) LilyPond usage for multiple authors? Bertalan == Bertalan Fodor lilypondt...@organum.hu writes: Bertalan A wiki would be perfect for this purpose I think. If the Bertalan extension for the wiki is smart enough, it can generate Bertalan various outputs. Bertalan MonAmiPierrot írta: Hello all, just some difficoult (but not stupid, I hope) questions. I talked about LilyPond in a conference on music edition and critical editions. With my surprise, some musicologists (some of which don't even use Finale!) asked me if LilyPond could be used in bigger critical editions projects (e.g., an opera) where multiple editors are involved. These editors would be: 1- the copyst who does the big physical job of writing down the code 2- the main critical editor 3- some expert revisor 4- the final editor who cares about layout (and don't forget at point 0- : the orginal author!) I'd prefer to use a source code control system for this kind of collaboration. Because LilyPond is text based, things like Mercurial, Perforce, etc., work really well to allow collaborative work, and to track who did what. -- Dr Peter Chubb peter DOT chubb AT nicta.com.au http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au ERTOS within National ICT Australia Kernel Engineering Group (KEG): Where Systems Brew. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user - Piero Faustini Main Software used: - LyX 1.6.2 on WinXP sp3; EndNote JabRef - MikTex - LaTeX class: Koma book - Lilypond 2.12 for example excerpts - BibLaTeX for bibliographies -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Advanced-%28web%29-LilyPond-usage-for-multiple-authors--tp24099693p24110906.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Compiling on MAC OS X 10.5.7
On 19/06/2009, at 11:21 AM, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:08:11AM +0700, Simon Mackenzie wrote: On 19/06/2009, at 8:37 AM, Tim McNamara wrote: On 18.06.2009, at 16:05, Simon Mackenzie wrote: Has any one had any success compiling Lilypond 2.12.2 on a MAC OS X 10.5.7 system? What are the errors reported by the compiler? And why not use the precompiled binary? The precompiled version 2.12.2 does not seem to have any menu I can access to compile lilypond scripts as instructed in the opening editor script. I.e. the only thing that appears in the menu bar is the LilyPond menu item, no compile menu item. Compiling from scratch will do nothing about this; compiling from scratch will just give you the command-line app that already works as part of the precompiled binaries. If you're seriously interested in fixing this, search the -devel mailist for the numerous discussions about what Apple broke in 10.5. But if you're not prepared to do a fair amount of low-level hacking in python and OSX packages, then I highly advise you to either use the command-line version, or use jedit (lilypondtool, I think it's called?) Cheers, - Graham Thanks Graham I'll look into setting up jEdit as you suggest. Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Advanced (web) LilyPond usage for multiple authors?
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LilyPond MonAmiPierrot wrote: I'm sorry I can't help on this level cause I have little-to-no knowledge on how all of this works. If you know of something in the web that can be taken as an example (I just found out a web-based LaTeX project http://code.google.com/p/latex-lab/ but still under development) could you give me the link? Thanks H. P.S. A very simple author/version control could be enough for 99% of needs if other 2 points are available in some way. Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: Well using commercial source control systems for handling lilypond projects seems quite odd. A wiki has many advantages to simple version control, though you could write a client that supports preview, multiple editions etc. But that would be a lot easier on a wiki platform. Original message From: Peter Chubb l...@chubb.wattle.id.au Sent: 19 Jun 2009 14:22 +10:00 To: Bertalan Fodor lilypondt...@organum.hu Cc: MonAmiPierrot pierofaust...@hotmail.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Advanced (web) LilyPond usage for multiple authors? Bertalan == Bertalan Fodor lilypondt...@organum.hu writes: Bertalan A wiki would be perfect for this purpose I think. If the Bertalan extension for the wiki is smart enough, it can generate Bertalan various outputs. Bertalan MonAmiPierrot írta: Hello all, just some difficoult (but not stupid, I hope) questions. I talked about LilyPond in a conference on music edition and critical editions. With my surprise, some musicologists (some of which don't even use Finale!) asked me if LilyPond could be used in bigger critical editions projects (e.g., an opera) where multiple editors are involved. These editors would be: 1- the copyst who does the big physical job of writing down the code 2- the main critical editor 3- some expert revisor 4- the final editor who cares about layout (and don't forget at point 0- : the orginal author!) I'd prefer to use a source code control system for this kind of collaboration. Because LilyPond is text based, things like Mercurial, Perforce, etc., work really well to allow collaborative work, and to track who did what. -- Dr Peter Chubb peter DOT chubb AT nicta.com.au http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au ERTOS within National ICT Australia Kernel Engineering Group (KEG): Where Systems Brew. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user - Piero Faustini Main Software used: - LyX 1.6.2 on WinXP sp3; EndNote JabRef - MikTex - LaTeX class: Koma book - Lilypond 2.12 for example excerpts - BibLaTeX for bibliographies ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Compiling on MAC OS X 10.5.7
Dear Simon: I have had no problems in compiling the very latest version of lily (12.3.1) in MacOS 10.5.7. It requieres some little tricks but nothing impossible. Have you used git to download it? The precompiled version 2.12.2 does not seem to have any menu I can access to compile lilypond scripts as instructed in the opening editor script. I.e. the only thing that appears in the menu bar is the LilyPond menu item, no compile menu item. Kinda weird Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: getting rid of ' and , in older scores
Yes, but having removed all the ticks, I can then compile and reinsert ticks where necessary -- probably not an odious task. I'll try it ... Gordon+ On 19/06/2009, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote: But if you remove all instances of ' and , then you're assuming that all notes are less than a fifth away from the preceding note - most unlikely. Nick -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.paynelilypond-user-bounces%2Bnick.payne =internode.on@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David Bobroff Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 3:58 PM To: Father Gordon Gilbert Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: getting rid of ' and , in older scores jEdit, or any decent editor for that matter, has a 'search/replace' function. Can't you simply search for ' and , and replace with nothing? This would cost you a few seconds per file. I imagine that you could also use sed to do this even faster. -David Father Gordon Gilbert wrote: Hi all, I've quite a number of older scores I've worked on over the years, starting with version 2.2.0 (and some from Mutopia even older than that. I have successfully used convert-ly on them to bring syntax up-to-date. But I did many of them before \relative was as easy-to-use as it is now -- even just using ' and '' and , and ,, to indicate octave ranges. I'd like to put \relative at the top of all my part sections, and delete all the octave markers. Is there any *elegant* way to go through these scores and eliminate all of the ' and , without deleting each and every one? I'm using LilyPond 2.12.1 on either Windows XP Home or Ubuntu Jaunty, with jEdit 4.3pre16 and LilyPondTool. I always appreciate the valuable advice see on this list. Blessings, Gordon+ - --- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.79/2186 - Release Date: 06/18/09 17:59:00 -- Fr. Gordon Gilbert Penetanguishene, ON ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: getting rid of ' and , in older scores
Father Gordon Gilbert wrote: Yes, but having removed all the ticks, I can then compile and reinsert ticks where necessary -- probably not an odious task. I'll try it ... What language are you notes inputted with? The default (ees fis etc...) or some other language? - Mark ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Petrucci-like spacing?
On 6/18/09 8:45 AM, Laura Conrad lcon...@laymusic.org wrote:
Carl == Carl D Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
Carl Does this seem at all promising?
Yes, but there's still the problem of extra space at the barline. I
tried Michael's solutions and doing nothing at all and there's still
extra space after the 4th whole note.
Carl How about this?
Carl \relative c'' {
Carl \key f \major
Carl \cadenzaOn
Carl g1*1/4 bes1*1/4 a1*1/4 g1*1/4 g1.*1/6 c4 bes4 c1*1/4
Carl }
Carl I think that gets rid of the extra space.
Yes, it does.
Here's the code defining petrucciSpacing:
petrucciSpacing =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
Set effective spacing of all notes to 1/4
(music-map (lambda (m)
(if (eq? (ly:music-property m 'name) 'NoteEvent)
(let*
((current-duration (ly:music-property m 'duration))
(current-log (ly:duration-log current-duration))
(current-length (ly:duration-length current-duration))
(current-dotcount
(ly:duration-dot-count current-duration))
(new-factor (ly:moment-div
(ly:make-moment 1 4)
current-length))
(new-numerator (ly:moment-main-numerator new-factor))
(new-denominator
(ly:moment-main-denominator new-factor)))
(set! (ly:music-property m 'duration)
(ly:make-duration
current-log
current-dotcount
new-numerator
new-denominator))
m)
m))
music))
\relative c'' {
\key f \major
\cadenzaOn
\petrucciSpacing {
g1 bes 1 a1 g1 g1. c4 bes4 c1 \bar ||
}
}
HTH,
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Can't Change Line Width
Thanks, Kieran. That fixed it. -David. - Original Message From: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca To: David Boothe dmboo...@yahoo.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:02:44 PM Subject: Re: Can't Change Line Width Hi David, I have a template that I use for setting the weekly Psalm antiphons - a single line melody with lyrics on letter size paper in landscape mode. It has always worked fine. Recently I upgraded Lilypond to 2.12 (on Windows). Now the width of the line is less than half the width of the page, causing the layout to be crowded, horizontally. It readable, but not easily. I believe v2.12 was when the default changed for ragged-right on single-line scores -- to fix this issue, add the line ragged-right = ##f to your \paper block. Hope this helps! Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: getting rid of ' and , in older scores
I wrote them all with the default (ees, fis, etc) because that was easier in earlier versions that trying to do \include. But while I understand that's now a whole lot easier, I'll have to take a bit of time to run the learning curve -- but I do intend to do so sometime ... Gordon+ On 19/06/2009, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: Father Gordon Gilbert wrote: Yes, but having removed all the ticks, I can then compile and reinsert ticks where necessary -- probably not an odious task. I'll try it ... What language are you notes inputted with? The default (ees fis etc...) or some other language? - Mark -- Fr. Gordon Gilbert Penetanguishene, ON ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
about Midi in Frescobaldi 0.7.11
Hi, It's a little bit annoying thing. I have installed it on Gentoo with the ebuild improved on the Frescobaldi's site. All is right. But when i save, compile and want to play the midi, a box opens where i have to write *each time* the path from timidity. It doesn't record the info for later. Well, i don't run KDE, only the libs and dependencies for Frescobaldi. In version 0.7.6 there wasn't this problem. If i do install in /usr/local the issue is the same. Any hints? -- Phil. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Menu bar
On 19.06.2009, at 06:52, Joe Bentley wrote: Hello to all at Lilypond First off, I must say, I'm impressed with the results that I've seen with your program, the engraving is beautiful. I am running a Mac OS X 10.5.6, and for some reason no drop-down menu appears while I am running Lilypond. I've installed it into my Applications folder and managed to save the example file to my desktop, but when I open the program and click on the program's name in the top menu bar, no menu appears. I've also tried ctrl+clicking, to no avail; I can't find the option for compiling the file anywhere. I've read the manual all the way up to the First Steps chapter that deals with opening and viewing the example file (2.1.1 I believe) and I haven't found any solutions. Hopefully this is simply a problem of my own technological ignorance. Thanks for your time -Joe B ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilyp...@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond There are issues with lilypond on osx 10.5. The lilypond download page (http://lilypond.org/web/install/) has several options for macintosh users. James E. Bailey ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
trill spanner down
I wasn't able to put the tr spanner below the note (staff) I tried to use, with \pitchedTrill --- \once \override TrillSpanner #'padding = #-12 or \trillSpannerDown without success... thanks.. Esenlikler! Best regards! Mehmet Okonsar pianist, composer, conductor == www.okonsar.com == Bugunku ozdeyisiniz: Your fortune for today is: == The buffalo isn't as dangerous as everyone makes him out to be. Statistics prove that in the United States more Americans are killed in automobile accidents than are killed by buffalo. -- Art Buchwald ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: getting rid of ' and , in older scores
Op vrijdag 19 juni 2009, schreef Bertalan Fodor: I think Frescobaldi or lyqi has a feature for this purpose. Frescobaldi hasn't, yet. But absolute - relative conversion is planned. best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Can't Change Line Width
Hi,
In 2.12 single line scores are by default short. To have single line scores
extend to the full line width, add ragged-right = ##f to the paper block.
( You *can* set line-width etc. in the \paper { } block, not the \layout
block. )
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: about Midi in Frescobaldi 0.7.11
Op vrijdag 19 juni 2009, schreef Philippe Hezaine: It's a little bit annoying thing. I have installed it on Gentoo with the ebuild improved on the Frescobaldi's site. All is right. But when i save, compile and want to play the midi, a box opens where i have to write *each time* the path from timidity. It doesn't record the info for later. Well, i don't run KDE, only the libs and dependencies for Frescobaldi. Isn't there a box to check 'Always use this application for files of this type'? The dialog in question is provided by KDE. In that case, try setting the default app for Midi files inside Gnome. Frescobaldi just 'runs' the file, as if you clicked on it in the file manager. (It might be confusing, the path and command for timidity in the configuation dialog is about timidity running as an ALSA midi client (so you can enter music with Rumor and hear the notes as played), not for playing back the LilyPond-generated MIDI file.) If this remains a problem, I'll be glad to alter Frescobaldi and make it possible that users enter a path to the desired MIDI player, independent of the OS default one. best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: trill spanner down
Mehmet Okonsar-3 wrote: I wasn't able to put the tr spanner below the note (staff) I tried to use, with \pitchedTrill --- \once \override TrillSpanner #'padding = #-12 or \trillSpannerDown without success... thanks.. here you nee to overwrite another property (which you can find in the internals reference IR): \override TrillSpanner #'direction = #-1 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/trill-spanner-down-tp24117986p24119479.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Large square brackets for modern notation
I want to draw square brackets taller than staff height to indicate, for example, free rhythm with specified pitches using stemless noteheads inside the brackets. I believe Penderecki and others have used them. Right now I'm trying text markup but can't get the brackets big and heavy enough to cover the whole staff height. Thanks Qian ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: about Midi in Frescobaldi 0.7.11
Op vrijdag 19 juni 2009, schreef Wilbert Berendsen: If this remains a problem, I'll be glad to alter Frescobaldi and make it possible that users enter a path to the desired MIDI player, independent of the OS default one. I just did :) best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
