Re: BreathingSigns and automatic beams

2014-06-24 Thread Jay Anderson
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:24 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
 You don't say which frustration.  You apparently want to have automatic
 beams across breath marks.  To me, that does not make a lot of sense.

Sorry, I took out too much context from the original message. It's
pretty common in horn music (etudes especially - probably other wind
music as well) for a breath mark to suggest a possible place to take a
breath. (It doesn't necessarily indicate a short pause or break.)
Perhaps lilypond's breathe isn't quite right for what I need. Here's
how the breath I'm wanting behaves:
- The mark generally doesn't affect the music spacing or beaming in any way.
- Horizontally it is at the end of a note's duration before the
following note (or possibly over a bar line in tight situations).
- Vertically it floats above beams and articulations, but below text
and tempo markings. Generally you don't see breath marks and slurs
together. I'm sure depending on the context it could go either inside
or outside the slur.

A regular text markup will get most of this except the horizontal
positioning. Maybe I'll play with that to see if I can make it work.

 But since the beam engraver sits at Voice level, that's sort of easy to
 cheat around:
 ...
 breathe = \new Voice \breathe
 ...
 Of course, this does not follow \voiceOne/\voiceTwo settings.

That's a creative workaround. For what I'm looking for there's only
one voice so this would work fine. Thanks.

-Jay

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: if/then/else in Lilypond with config file

2014-06-24 Thread Hartmut Leister
Hello Johan,

for the chords hiding this works perfectly, thank you.

However, it doesn't work on the header.
If I try to envelop header variables, it stops with an error:
 Starte lilypond-windows.exe 2.16.2 [score.ly]...
 »/Path_to_Dropbox/Temp/Lilypond_bool/score.ly« wird verarbeitet
 Analysieren...
 /Path_to_Dropbox/Temp/Lilypond_bool/score.ly:9:4: Fehler: syntax
error, unexpected MUSIC_FUNCTION
 \ifDefinedThenElse #'displayHeader
 /Path_to_Dropbox/Temp/Lilypond_bool/score.ly:11:6: Fehler: syntax
error, unexpected STRING
   title = Some title
 /Path_to_Dropbox/Temp/Lilypond_bool/score.ly:9:4: Fehler: Fehler
gefunden, musikalischer Ausdruck wird ignoriert
 \ifDefinedThenElse #'displayHeader
 /Path_to_Dropbox/Temp/Lilypond_bool/score.ly:15:0: Fehler: syntax
error, unexpected '}'
 }

 schwerer Fehler: gescheiterte Dateien:
/Path_to_Dropbox/Temp/Lilypond_bool/score.ly

It also doesn't work with the whole header enveloped.
For minimal not-working example see [1] (also added error messages in
comments).

I've never written Scheme or LISP, so I can just speculate it's because
\ifDefinedThenElse is defined as a music function, whereas header and
header components aren't in music context.

So your solution helped along the way and is already included into my
newest project. Thank you for that.
Still, the header I have to uncomment manually (RegEx that is).

Best wishes
Hartmut

[1] https://www.dropbox.com/sh/w2ekud6e507asdh/AACeoYQVTP1_9qQjZ_eUyZDua

-- 
Hartmut Leister haleis...@gmx.de

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: BreathingSigns and automatic beams

2014-06-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG

 - The mark generally doesn't affect the music spacing or beaming in
   any way.

I can't believe that it doesn't affect spacing.  As soon as you insert
something visible into the score that has a timing value (and a
breathing mark definitely has, if probably not specified exactly), it
*must* take part of the horizontal formatting.  You even give a hint
how to position it:

 - Horizontally it is at the end of a note's duration before the
   following note (or possibly over a bar line in tight situations).

Over a bar line?  Can you show a real-world example of that in a
printed edition?  I've never seen that before.


Werner

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: BreathingSigns and automatic beams

2014-06-24 Thread James
On 24/06/14 08:13, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
 - The mark generally doesn't affect the music spacing or beaming in
   any way.
 I can't believe that it doesn't affect spacing.  As soon as you insert
 something visible into the score that has a timing value (and a
 breathing mark definitely has, if probably not specified exactly), it
 *must* take part of the horizontal formatting.  You even give a hint
 how to position it:
I've not seen it officially printed either but I have had enough used
brass scores to play from to know one when I see it. Also the myriad of
teachers I had would use these 'marks' to show a beginner (like me)
where the best place to take these breathes was based up on what was
coming next or the rhythm of the piece etc.

It doesn't have any musical timing in the caesura sense and ideally it
is supposed to be 'hidden' from the listener - or to sound as natural as
possible. When playing something like this, having these 'sign posts'
dotted about gives you an idea of if you need to 'stop and fill the
tank' (as one teacher put it) or if you can make it 'over the hill' to
the next stop. Sort of a 'Last Breath before the Highway - next breath
in 40 miles' :)

 - Horizontally it is at the end of a note's duration before the
   following note (or possibly over a bar line in tight situations).


 Over a bar line?  Can you show a real-world example of that in a
 printed edition?  I've never seen that before.
I've never seen it printed but the few Trumpet teachers I had when
learning to play would indicate it with a tick-like mark and bar breaks
are more often the best place to take this sneaky breath than in a
measure itself - it just depends. You take your air where you can!

James


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Fwd: Change TupletBracket slope?

2014-06-24 Thread David Stephen Grant
Thank you Abraham, this is just what I need.
Best, David



On 23 June 2014 21:07, tisimst tisi...@gmail.com wrote:

 David,

 You can manually place the left and right ends of the bracket like this
 (and
 adjusting to taste):

 \version 2.19.8
 {
   \clef bass
   
 {
   a, a4
 }
 \\
 {
   /*\once \override TupletBracket.positions = #'(-7 . -7)*/
   \tuplet 6/4 { r16 g e d b, a, }
 }
   
 }

 
 http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n163571/flat-tuplet-bracket.png
 

 This is also true for beams and other kinds of notation objects like this.

 Regards,
 Abraham



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Change-TupletBracket-slope-tp163546p163571.html
 Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list
 lilypond-user@gnu.org
 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Double key signature

2014-06-24 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi All,

On the french list we are working on a Merulo score with an 8 lines staff,
2 clefs and 2 key signature :

*
http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/Portee-a-huit-lignes-deux-clefs-et-deux-bemols-tt7581415.html

*
http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/file/n7581418/merulo.png

Herewith is my last piece of code. As you can notice, I still have to
manually set the distance between the key signatures.

Has anyone any brilliant idea/other way how to come to this 8 lines staff ?

Thanks in advance,
Pierre
\version 2.18.2

global = {
  \key d\minor
  \time 4/4
}

high = \relative c' {
  c1 r4 b a g g1
}

low = \relative c {
   f1 b  r4 f e d
}

\score {
  \new Staff
  \with {
 \override StaffSymbol.line-count = #8
 clefGlyph = #clefs.C
 clefPosition = #1
 middleCPosition = #1
 middleCClefPosition = #1
 \override Clef.stencil = 
   #(lambda (grob)(grob-interpret-markup grob #{ 
 \markup\column {
\fontsize # -1 {
  \musicglyph #clefs.C_change 
  \vspace #-.32 
  \musicglyph #clefs.F_change 
}
  } #}))
 \override KeySignature.stencil = 
   #(lambda (grob)(grob-interpret-markup grob #{ 
  \markup\translate #'(-10 . -.01)
\column {
 \score { 
\new Staff 
\global
\layout {
  \context {
\Score
\omit StaffSymbol
\omit Clef
\omit TimeSignature
  }
}
  }
  \vspace #-0.16 % !! à régler en fonction de l'armure !!
  \score { 
\new Staff 
\global
\layout {
  \context {
\Score
\omit StaffSymbol
\omit Clef
\omit TimeSignature
  }
}
  }
} #}))
  }
  {
\global
 \high \\ \low 
  }
  \layout {}
}___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: BreathingSigns and automatic beams

2014-06-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
 I can't believe that it doesn't affect spacing.  As soon as you
 insert something visible into the score that has a timing value
 (and a breathing mark definitely has, if probably not specified
 exactly), it *must* take part of the horizontal formatting.  You
 even give a hint how to position it:

 I've not seen it officially printed either but I have had enough
 used brass scores to play from to know one when I see it.  Also the
 myriad of teachers I had would use these 'marks' to show a beginner
 (like me) where the best place to take these breathes was based up
 on what was coming next or the rhythm of the piece etc.

I fully understand what you say, and similar symbols are used for
singers, too, however, I think this somehow contradicts what lilypond
is intended to do: engraving well-formatted music.  It's not
lilypond's job to imitate hand-written marks!  In other words, I want
to see some *printed* editions with such entries so that we can adjust
lilypond accordingly, if necessary.

In some Puccini scores, marks for possible breathing places are
indicated by a small comma.  Attached an example taken from the vocal
score of Boheme.


Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Nifty trick with tags and \shape

2014-06-24 Thread tisimst
Very cool! Thanks for sharing! I didn't realize you could do such a thing. I
can see this coming in handy.

-Abraham



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Nifty-trick-with-tags-and-shape-tp163576p163599.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Chord name on song section

2014-06-24 Thread Carlo Vanoni
Hi everyone,

I have a song with various sections (intro, verse, chorus, ...) defined as 
variables.
I would like to add chords on top of some of these sections.
On the Lilypond manual all the examples add chords as a separate voice using  
  to bound everything togheter. I have score, tabs and chords, so I need to 
do something like

mainStaff = {
  \intro

  \chorus
  \verse

  \chorus

}

\score {
  
    \new ChordNames { \harmony }

    \new Staff { \mainStaff }
    \new TabStaff { \mainStaff }
  
}
  

This implies that I have defined the harmony for all of the song.
How to define (and print) harmony for, say, just the intro?
I can use markups, but I prefer something more elegant.

Thanks!
MIX
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


OT? Error importing Organ xml files made in Musescore

2014-06-24 Thread Son_V
Hi all, can't understand why I can't import Organ xml files that I make in
Musescore (I find it a lot esaier to write with a direct reading of what I'
doing, then to load the xml files in Frescodaldi to get the graphical
output). I get this error message:

The file couldn't be converted. Error message:
musicxml2ly: Lettura di MusicXML da /home/vincent/Musica/Cancella/c.xml
...
musicxml2ly: Conversione nelle espressioni di LilyPond... REPEATED NINE
TIMES
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/musicxml2ly, line 2986, in module
main()
  File /usr/bin/musicxml2ly, line 2981, in main
voices = convert (filename, options)
  File /usr/bin/musicxml2ly, line 2896, in convert
update_score_setup (score, part_list, voices)
  File /usr/bin/musicxml2ly, line 2794, in update_score_setup
score_structure.set_part_information (part_id, staves_info)
  File /usr/share/lilypond/2.16.2/python/musicexp.py, line 1935, in
set_part_information
self.contents.set_part_information (part_id, staves_info)
  File /usr/share/lilypond/2.16.2/python/musicexp.py, line 1774, in
set_part_information
c.set_part_information (part_name, staves_info)
AttributeError: PartGroupInfo instance has no attribute
'set_part_information'

Never had a problem with choir staves. What can I do? Many thanks.



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OT-Error-importing-Organ-xml-files-made-in-Musescore-tp163601.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Nifty trick with tags and \shape

2014-06-24 Thread SoundsFromSound
James Harkins-2 wrote
 If you ever need the score and a transposed part to have a different slur 
 shape in places... this does it :)
 
 Just had to share -- actually I wasn't entirely sure this would work, but 
 it's perfect!
 
 hjh
 
 \version 2.18.2
 \language english
 
 music = \relative c' {
   \tupletSpan 1*6/8
   \tuplet 4/3 {
 cs4 
 \tag #'scoreOnly { \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 1.2) (0 . -0.5))
 Slur 
 }
 \tag #'partOnly { \shape #'((-0.5 . 1.5) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 1.0)) 
 Slur }
 f,! ( d' e cs' b'2 g,4 ) }
   \tupletSpan \default
 }
 
 \score {
   \new Staff {
 \time 12/8
 % from score in C
 \keepWithTag #'scoreOnly \music
 \bar ||
 % transposed part with the same slur shape adjustment, VERY ugly
 \keepWithTag #'scoreOnly \transpose a c' \music
 \bar ||
 % fixed
 \keepWithTag #'partOnly \transpose a c' \music
 \bar ||
   }
 }
 
 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list

 lilypond-user@

 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Interesting! I'll check this out tonight, that's pretty sweet! Thanks!





-
composer | sound designer 
LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) -- http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond
--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Nifty-trick-with-tags-and-shape-tp163576p163602.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: OT? Error importing Organ xml files made in Musescore

2014-06-24 Thread Richard Shann
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 06:59 -0700, Son_V wrote:
 Hi all, can't understand why I can't import Organ xml files

I would be interested to know how Denemo's musicxml import manages with
your file - version 1.1.4 at least. Although not at all sophisticated I
don't have any examples where it fails to produce at least the bulk of
the music from a musicxml file (and then of course you have that music
in LilyPond format).
I realize you wouldn't want to use that route as a normal thing... (if
you can send me the musicxml file, I can test importing it)

regards

Richard Shann

  that I make in
 Musescore (I find it a lot esaier to write with a direct reading of what I'
 doing, then to load the xml files in Frescodaldi to get the graphical
 output). I get this error message:
 
 The file couldn't be converted. Error message:
 musicxml2ly: Lettura di MusicXML da /home/vincent/Musica/Cancella/c.xml
 ...
 musicxml2ly: Conversione nelle espressioni di LilyPond... REPEATED NINE
 TIMES
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/musicxml2ly, line 2986, in module
 main()
   File /usr/bin/musicxml2ly, line 2981, in main
 voices = convert (filename, options)
   File /usr/bin/musicxml2ly, line 2896, in convert
 update_score_setup (score, part_list, voices)
   File /usr/bin/musicxml2ly, line 2794, in update_score_setup
 score_structure.set_part_information (part_id, staves_info)
   File /usr/share/lilypond/2.16.2/python/musicexp.py, line 1935, in
 set_part_information
 self.contents.set_part_information (part_id, staves_info)
   File /usr/share/lilypond/2.16.2/python/musicexp.py, line 1774, in
 set_part_information
 c.set_part_information (part_name, staves_info)
 AttributeError: PartGroupInfo instance has no attribute
 'set_part_information'
 
 Never had a problem with choir staves. What can I do? Many thanks.
 
 
 
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OT-Error-importing-Organ-xml-files-made-in-Musescore-tp163601.html
 Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list
 lilypond-user@gnu.org
 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: BreathingSigns and automatic beams

2014-06-24 Thread Jay Anderson
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
 I fully understand what you say, and similar symbols are used for
 singers, too, however, I think this somehow contradicts what lilypond
 is intended to do: engraving well-formatted music.  It's not
 lilypond's job to imitate hand-written marks!  In other words, I want
 to see some *printed* editions with such entries so that we can adjust
 lilypond accordingly, if necessary.

* 
http://imslp.org/wiki/200_%C3%89tudes_nouvelles_m%C3%A9lodiques_et_progressives_pour_cor_(Alphonse,_Maxime)
- Book 4 #3 has some examples of breaths over bar lines (though it
isn't very consistent).

* http://imslp.org/wiki/Adagio_for_Horn_and_Piano,_Op.31_(Draeseke,_Felix)
- The solo part has breath marks. None right over the bar line.
(http://imslp.org/wiki/Romanze_for_Horn_and_Piano,_Op.32_(Draeseke,_Felix)
is similar)

* http://imslp.org/wiki/Nocturno,_Op.7_(Strauss,_Franz) - The breath
marks are quite small in this one.

* http://imslp.org/wiki/60_Etudes_for_Low-Horn,_Op.6_(Kopprasch,_Georg)
- In the Gumbert edition he uses two different marks to indicate short
quick breaths and bigger breaths. Many of these marks are directly
over a bar line (see #13).

-Jay

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Chord name on song section

2014-06-24 Thread Johan Vromans
Carlo Vanoni vanoniiscrizi...@yahoo.it writes:

 This implies that I have defined the harmony for all of the song.
 How to define (and print) harmony for, say, just the intro?

Specify the chords of the intro, and leave the rest empty?

-- Johan

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: BreathingSigns and automatic beams

2014-06-24 Thread Brian Barker

At 13:06 24/06/2014 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
It's not lilypond's job to imitate hand-written marks!  In other 
words, I want to see some *printed* editions with such entries [sc. 
over bar lines] so that we can adjust lilypond accordingly, if necessary.


In some Puccini scores, marks for possible breathing places are 
indicated by a small comma.


I'm not sure whether this helps, but Elaine Gould writes (at p. 187) 
under Pauses / Break in sound:
Place the comma and caesura just before a subsequent note or 
barline. [...] In a score, the comma, caesura and pause over a 
barline should appear at the top of each instrumental section only 
(so as not to be intersected by a barline). When not over a barline, 
place the symbol above every stave.


This implies that she countenances such marks over barlines - but 
perhaps this sort of comma is a pause, not just a breathing mark.


Brian Barker  



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Chord name on song section

2014-06-24 Thread Knute Snortum
I've used two score sections in situations like this, but then you get
separate midi files.  Up to you.


Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl wrote:

 Carlo Vanoni vanoniiscrizi...@yahoo.it writes:

  This implies that I have defined the harmony for all of the song.
  How to define (and print) harmony for, say, just the intro?

 Specify the chords of the intro, and leave the rest empty?

 -- Johan

 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list
 lilypond-user@gnu.org
 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Mac testers needed for Frescobaldi! (again)

2014-06-24 Thread donabbondio
I installed the app.
No problems at all.
The app run smoothly.
No problem on midi.
No problem on import xml.

great

Enrico
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Mac testers needed for Frescobaldi! (again)

2014-06-24 Thread jimmyg521
Davide,

First, much thanks for your very patient responses to my SIP API errors 
with the Port version of Frescobaldi. 

I'm happy to report that the app bundle, thus far, works flawlessly so no 
further need for the Port install of Frescobaldi. I've opened some fairly 
hairy scores which use book structure and all works as expected. I have 
not, yet, tested the conversion apps. But for now all is working well.

Best regards,

Guy

On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:17:29 AM UTC-5, Davide Liessi wrote:

 Dear FrescobaldiLilyPondMac users, 
 some months ago I published a DMG disk image containing an 
 experimental Frescobaldi.app bundle. 

 Some packaging problems were reported ([1]): 
 - lack of MIDI support (PortMIDI was not included), 
 - impossibility to run convert-ly and musicxml2ly (the wrong Python 
 interpreter was used for the scripts bundled in LilyPond.app). 

 During the last days I was able to fix these problems (at least on my 
 machine). 
 I uploaded a new version of Frescobaldi.app, based on the newly 
 released 2.0.16, at 

 https://www.dropbox.com/s/whu5qnn5pys81ix/Frescobaldi-2.0.16-devapp-20140616.dmg
  

 The application contains some 64 bit code, so it won't run on machines 
 with 32 bit CPU (I'll try to solve this in the next iteration). 

 I would be very grateful if you could download the application, test 
 it and report any issues. 
 In particular you should test if MIDI output is working [2] and if you 
 are able to update a file with convert-ly and to import a MusicXML 
 file (example MusicXML files at [3]). 

 The test should be harmless: the only collateral effect is that any 
 change you'll make to the settings inside this application bundle will 
 be picked up by your usual installation of Frescobaldi, since they'll 
 share the same preferences file. [4] 

 The previous tests revealed only the mentioned problems, so the 
 application should be quite stable. 
 However this application bundle is still considered experimental, so I 
 don't recommend it for everyday use (although I really appreciate 
 people testing it in everyday use cases). 
 After the tests I advise you to delete the application bundle and wait 
 for the official release. [5] 

 Last but not least, I would like to thank once again the users who 
 tested the previous version of the application. 

 Best wishes. 
 Davide 


 [1] The splash screen bug 
 (https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/428) and some very 
 critical usability problems (in particular compatibility with screen 
 readers) were also reported, but they are certainly unrelated to the 
 installation method, so I didn't address them. 

 [2] I remind you that in order to have MIDI support 
 FluidSynth/qsynth/SimpleSynth must be running and Frescobaldi must 
 recognize the MIDI ports (you should either start *synth before 
 Frescobaldi or refresh the MIDI ports in Frescobaldi's preferences). 

 [3] http://www.musicxml.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/xmlsamples.zip 

 [4] Actually, if your usual version of Frescobaldi is older than 
 October 2013, your settings will become inaccessible from that 
 version, while they will still be accessible from versions of the 
 program newer than that date. 
 But if you're running such an old version, you should seriously 
 consider updating to the newly released 2.0.16 (it will be available 
 through MacPorts in a few days): Frescobaldi has improved a whole lot 
 in the last months! 

 [5] To avoid messing with your current setup (except for the settings 
 changes mentioned in [4]) and forgetting to delete the application 
 bundle after the test, you can run the application directly from the 
 disk image, without copying it to the /Applications directory. 

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Double key signature

2014-06-24 Thread Keith OHara
Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.paris at gmail.com writes:

 On the french list we are working on a Merulo score with an 8 lines 
staff, 2 clefs and 2 key signature 

 As you can notice, I still have to manually set the distance between the 
key signatures.

LilyPond supports custom key signatures, and will print this for d\minor
if you ask for an extended range of printed flats:

 \new Staff
  \with {  
\override StaffSymbol.line-count = #8
\override KeySignature.flat-positions = #'((-7 . 6))
\override KeyCancellation.flat-positions = #'((-7 . 6))
% presumably sharps are also printed in both octaves
\override KeySignature.sharp-positions = #'((-6 . 7))
\override KeyCancellation.sharp-positions = #'((-6 . 7))
  \override Clef.stencil = #
  (lambda (grob)(grob-interpret-markup grob 
  #{ \markup\combine 
\musicglyph #clefs.C 
\translate #'(0.9 . -2) \musicglyph #clefs.F 
   #}))
clefPosition = #1
middleCPosition = #1
middleCClefPosition = #1
  } {
  \key d\minor
  \time 4/4 R1
 }

You might like \translate, in units of staff spaces, in place of \vspace.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: temporarily disable Dot_column_engraver?

2014-06-24 Thread Keith OHara
Mark Polesky markpolesky at gmail.com writes:

 Normally, the dots on dotted notes in different voicesshould be aligned 

The textbooks say we should set dots set independently for each voice
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2200

But slightly-misaligned dots in some cases drew some complaints, so
LilyPond sets all voices' dots in one column by default.

 Is theresome override to tell LilyPond: In this voice, stop using
 the staff's Dot_column_engraver, and start using the Voice's*own* 
 Dot_column_engraver, which I could then revert when
 I'm done with the small notes?  

Put the small notes in a temporary Voice 
and give that Voice a Dot_column_engraver.

Having this engraver in both a Voice and Staff is not problem here.
You get two DotColumns, but that is what you want, and the Dots that
are caught by the DotColumn in the Voice are not caught again by that
in the Staff.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user