Re: \layout { \omit Voice.StringNumber } ?
Am 24.08.2014 um 22:17 schrieb BB:
In lots of example code I found the line
\layout { \omit Voice.StringNumber }
If I omit it (i. e. make he line a comment or delete it) there happens -
nothing!
Do you actually have any string numbers in your music?
A tiny working bit of code would make it easier for the list to help you
there ...
I use \omit StringNumber in cases where I have normal and tablature
staves in combination, because the tablature shows on which string a
note is played, so a StringNmber indication is redundant and clutters
the output.
HTH a bit,
Marc
That makes me curious. To my regret I cannot find any explanation in the
documentation.
Please, can anyone solve that miracle?
Regards
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
\mark under score clashing with measure numbers
Hi all,
I'm using this code to put a "D.C. al Fine" below the staff in a score:
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark.break-visibility = #end-of-line-visible
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark.self-alignment-X = #RIGHT
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'direction = #DOWN
\mark "D.C. al Fine"
but I'm also using the following code to number every bar in the score. The
problem is that the D.C. mark is printing out *below* the measure numbers
instead of *above (or between the measure numbers and the bottom staff).* Is
there anyway for me to fix this. I appreciate all your help.
Craig
\new Dynamics {
\startMeasureCount
s1*4
\stopMeasureCount
}
\layout {
\context {
\Dynamics
\consists #Measure_counter_engraver
\override MeasureCounter.direction = #DOWN
\override MeasureCounter.font-encoding = #'latin1
\override MeasureCounter.font-shape = #'italic
% to control the distance of the Dynamics context from the staff:
\override VerticalAxisGroup.nonstaff-relatedstaff-spacing.padding = #2
}
\context {
\Score
\remove "Bar_number_engraver"
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with wrong font/glyphs/graphics
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 10:51:53PM +0200, Malte Meyn wrote: > That is a known problem. If I remember correctly this only occurs with > some old versions of LilyPond when using a certain version of > ghostscript, but I don’t remember the exact details ... > > What versions of LilyPond (lilypond --version) and ghostscript > (ghostscript --version) do you use? Thanks for the reply. Lilypond 2.16.2 and ghostscript 9.10. But it has been so since I installed this system in March, there were no upgrades ever since. Some other package must be the culprit. -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. Computers are the most intelligent idiots in existence. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with wrong font/glyphs/graphics
That is a known problem. If I remember correctly this only occurs with some old versions of LilyPond when using a certain version of ghostscript, but I don’t remember the exact details ... What versions of LilyPond (lilypond --version) and ghostscript (ghostscript --version) do you use? On 24.08.2014 15:13, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: Hello I think I've had this problem before, but back then it affected only the G clef. There is more broken this time. I have two machines here, both run 64 bit Gentoo linux with an identical software setup (as far as possible, since the hardware is very different). The problem: one machine renders certain components of a score differently to the other. The most prominent thing is again the different G clef. But also the 8th notes look different. What makes it not seem like a freak bug to me is the choirstaff bracket. It looks different, but like it was intentionally designed that way with its arty curls at the end. Is that a different music font? Can you enlighten me what's wrong here? The attached screenshot shows the result of both machines which used an identical input file which is based on a template I've been using for years. The top staff is the way I would expect it, the bottom one shows the result that is different. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
\layout { \omit Voice.StringNumber } ?
In lots of example code I found the line
\layout { \omit Voice.StringNumber }
If I omit it (i. e. make he line a comment or delete it) there happens -
nothing!
That makes me curious. To my regret I cannot find any explanation in the
documentation.
Please, can anyone solve that miracle?
Regards
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug: breathing sign and accidental overlap
2014-08-24 16:11 GMT+02:00 Frank Steinmetzger : > >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2354 > > Ah ok, sorry for the noise then. I worked around with an invisible cis an > octave down which introduces the needed spacing. I'd rather suggest to use \override BreathingSign.extra-spacing-height = #'(0 . 1) as it's cleaner (i.e. doesn't pollute the music with artificial notes) best, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug: breathing sign and accidental overlap
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:13:34PM +0100, James wrote: > On 24/08/14 13:56, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Dear list > > > > I just discovered a problem with one of my Distler scores which uses lots of > > sharp accidentals and breathing signs. If a sharp follows a breathing sign, > > then the two touch each other, but *only* if the note is on a ledger line. > > […] > Thanks. > > This is > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2354 Ah ok, sorry for the noise then. I worked around with an invisible cis an octave down which introduces the needed spacing. -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service. Why do Kamikaze pilots wear helmets? signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug: breathing sign and accidental overlap
On 24/08/14 13:56, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Dear list
>
> I just discovered a problem with one of my Distler scores which uses lots of
> sharp accidentals and breathing signs. If a sharp follows a breathing sign,
> then the two touch each other, but *only* if the note is on a ledger line.
>
> Snippet to reproduce:
>
>
> \version "2.16"
> \language "deutsch"
>
> \paper {
> ragged-right = ##t
> }
>
> \relative c {
> \clef bass
> \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
>
> e4 f gis \breathe cis | \break
> e,4 f gis \breathe cis, |
> }
>
> \layout {
> indent = 0
> }
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
Thanks.
This is
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2354
James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Problem with wrong font/glyphs/graphics
Hello I think I've had this problem before, but back then it affected only the G clef. There is more broken this time. I have two machines here, both run 64 bit Gentoo linux with an identical software setup (as far as possible, since the hardware is very different). The problem: one machine renders certain components of a score differently to the other. The most prominent thing is again the different G clef. But also the 8th notes look different. What makes it not seem like a freak bug to me is the choirstaff bracket. It looks different, but like it was intentionally designed that way with its arty curls at the end. Is that a different music font? Can you enlighten me what's wrong here? The attached screenshot shows the result of both machines which used an identical input file which is based on a template I've been using for years. The top staff is the way I would expect it, the bottom one shows the result that is different. -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service. The advantage of RSS jokes is that you always know the newest one. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Bug: breathing sign and accidental overlap
Dear list
I just discovered a problem with one of my Distler scores which uses lots of
sharp accidentals and breathing signs. If a sharp follows a breathing sign,
then the two touch each other, but *only* if the note is on a ledger line.
Snippet to reproduce:
\version "2.16"
\language "deutsch"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
}
\relative c {
\clef bass
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
e4 f gis \breathe cis | \break
e,4 f gis \breathe cis, |
}
\layout {
indent = 0
}
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service.
Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
