Re: Changing notehead sizes within chords
David B. Stocker notesetters...@gmail.com writes:
On 06/29/2015 06:32 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Maybe:
\version 2.18.2
font-size-tweak =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
(map-some-music
(lambda (m)
(and (music-is-of-type? m 'note-event)
#{ \tweak font-size #-3 $m #}))
music))
HTH,
Harm
Klaus and Thomas,
Thank you. These are exactly the kind of thing I was looking for.
I've been starting to fool around with scheme and it's going very
slowly. Maybe examining these and learning how/why they work will help
me with the lilypond-specific scheme knowledge required to start
solving some of these challenges.
Do either of you recommend a source on Scheme for beginners?
Your best bet at this level is the Extending LilyPond guide in the
manuals: the above example contains actually only two typical Scheme
constructs, namely lambda and and. All the rest are specific to
LilyPond.
And even then you'll just find some of those constructs covered in the
guide. The next step then is skimming
ly/music-functions-init.ly
and see what makes sense to you, trying to look up some of the functions
used there (several more complicated ones are defined in
scm/music-functions.scm).
And read the user list for people's problems and the given solutions.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Partial Bars
Hi Bill, Can you please include a minimal compilable example that shows your problem? I don't plan to do both - goto the next shop or library to get that menut - guess what 'part' expresses in the context of that piece - write an example that could probably the same problems yours have Partial measures are possible in different ways, also 'in the middle'. Best regards Helge ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: transposable figured bass?
On 29 June 2015 at 19:13, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-06-29 18:08 GMT+02:00 Ralf Mattes r.mat...@mh-freiburg.de: Just a question - is this an example drawn from a historic source? What you call a flat sign would back then be called a fa-sign and the corresponing sharp sign would be read as a mi sign. Both voces are independent of transposition, so C♭ does _not_ denote a C flat (ces) but rather a C-fa which is exactly what is needed in your example in _both_ cases, so (in case this is not an original source) you might better write 65♭ in the first, untransposed case. HTH Ralf Mattes I'd like to second that, it's what I learned decades ago, iirc ;) See also the attached png from BWV 121 Sorry for the bad resolution. (Although the right Hand is not Bach ofcourse.) The score can be downloaded at http://imslp.org/wiki/Christum_wir_sollen_loben_schon,_BWV_121_%28Bach,_Johann_Sebastian%29 Cheers, Harm I will look at my (modern) harmony book to see what they use. I think for a tierce de picardie chord in the key of Gm, they would use a Natural to indicate the major third, and a Sharp to indicate the same interval in the key of Dm. However, that raises the important question of what an ABRSM Theory examiner would do, if I used a flat sign to write a minor triad in a chord where the major third is sharpened... Another think -- in the example you give, is a natural sign only there to correct a previous accidental on the figure? (otherwise, what else would it mean?). Thanks, Chris ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Changing notehead sizes within chords
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: 2015-06-30 7:57 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: And read the user list for people's problems and the given solutions. Yep, I still benefit from studying those problems/solutions. Actually, my proposal is inspired by http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-06/msg00673.html adjusting it to the current problem/version exactly as David K recommended. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweaking in scheme
-Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:13 PM To: Peter Gentry Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Tweaking in scheme David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: Peter Gentry peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk writes: -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] One can also try to do this kind of iteration oneself in order to only use the less invasive tweaks and get the color covered: \version 2.19.22 tweakIV = #(define-music-function (music) (ly:music?) (map-some-music (lambda (m) (and (music-is-of-type? 'note-event) Yikes. Of course (music-is-of-type? m 'note-event) here. (tweak 'color red (tweak 'style 'harmonic m music)) -- David Kastrup Big improvement in clarity (smugness justified) - and comforting to see that even the gods can slip up occaisionally (it's a daily occurrence for mere mortals) :) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Changing notehead sizes within chords
2015-06-30 7:57 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
David B. Stocker notesetters...@gmail.com writes:
On 06/29/2015 06:32 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Maybe:
\version 2.18.2
font-size-tweak =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
(map-some-music
(lambda (m)
(and (music-is-of-type? m 'note-event)
#{ \tweak font-size #-3 $m #}))
music))
HTH,
Harm
Klaus and Thomas,
Thank you. These are exactly the kind of thing I was looking for.
I've been starting to fool around with scheme and it's going very
slowly. Maybe examining these and learning how/why they work will help
me with the lilypond-specific scheme knowledge required to start
solving some of these challenges.
Do either of you recommend a source on Scheme for beginners?
Your best bet at this level is the Extending LilyPond guide in the
manuals: the above example contains actually only two typical Scheme
constructs, namely lambda and and. All the rest are specific to
LilyPond.
And even then you'll just find some of those constructs covered in the
guide. The next step then is skimming
ly/music-functions-init.ly
and see what makes sense to you, trying to look up some of the functions
used there (several more complicated ones are defined in
scm/music-functions.scm).
For typical scheme- (better guile-) constructs you can refer to the
guile manual and you'll find a lot of scheme-tutorials online.
And read the user list for people's problems and the given solutions.
Yep, I still benefit from studying those problems/solutions.
Actually, my proposal is inspired by
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-06/msg00673.html
adjusting it to the current problem/version exactly as David K recommended.
Cheers,
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
