Re: Custom clef horizontal adjustment.
I figured out why copying and pasting the postscript code did not work. The 'lineto, moveto, curveto' commands must come before the numbers in the \path-like version, whereas in the postscript version the 'lineto, moveto, curveto' commands come after the numbers. David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Interactive PDF Link to Notes in Preview
Il giorno gio 5 lug 2018 alle 18:57, Anders Eriksson ha scritto: On 2018-07-05 18:30, Federico Bruni wrote: If I type lilypond and then hit TAB, it's not in the available commands ON windows the Tab completion only "sees" programs in the current directory or if you already have entered a path, the directory the path is pointing to. So if you don't get an completion then there isn't any program that begins with 'lilypond' in the directory I do get completion for three programs starting with lilypond. IIRC, lilypond.exe, lilypond-book.exe and lilypond-windows.exe. I got these while I was in a different directory, since that directory, as I wrote, is in the PATH. So the question is why lilypond-invoke-editor is not considered as a program by Windows shell. Perhaps because it does not end with .exe? Should it be made executable? I don't know Windows at all... ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Custom clef horizontal adjustment.
David and Pierre,
Thank you for the suggestions. I appreciate you making a code example
for me. I saw this method earlier in the LSR, but could not make sense
of it at the time. Pierre, your example helps me to see the difference
between the "\path" way of doing things and the "\markup \postscript"
way of doing things.
I have several questions that are arising as I play with the code and
try to understand its behavior.
The \path-like version shifts the glyph over 2 units from the postscript
method. Is there a way to do some kind of 'translate' equivalent with
the \path commands in Scheme? Do I need to do something like make a
spreadsheet that recalculates all the numbers and then retype them; or,
could some different Scheme code be added to move the glyph left or
right without having to manually reenter the numbers? For example:
Sudo-code:
(moveto
(
... moveto,
lineto,
curveto,
closepath commands
))
(I am sure my noobiness is very apparent with this question!)
I intend to make glyphs in FontForge or Inkscape and export them as an
eps. If I just copy and past the postscript numbers into the \path-like
code and then change the code: (ly:stencil-scale altoClef (* .4 mlt) (*
.4 mlt)))
To: (ly:stencil-scale altoClef (* .004 mlt) (*
.004 mlt)))
... it does not compile and I get an error message. Why? (The postscript
numbers with the .004 scale and the \path numbers with the .4 scale
calculate to the same numbers.) Also, what is 'mlt' an abbreviation for?
At my level of understanding, I see using a spreadsheet to translate the
postscript numbers into \path numbers. Is there a better way of doing this?
I am beginning to understand how Scheme functions work, but I wonder -
What do these commands do?:
(cons -0.1 5)
(cons -5 5)
I found out in 'Extending 1.1.4' that 'cons' is a Scheme way of creating
value pairs. But, what parameters are they effecting? While playing with
them I got the spacing of the glyph and the various barlines, notes, and
time signature spacing to change, but I could not discover any logical
pattern and it often caused note clashing.
Also, how could one add the "filled #t" or "filled #f" property into the
"altoClef = " Scheme function?
The main question I am wondering is - How does LilyPond determine the
size of a grob, and can it be configured manually? Can the leftmost or
rightmost extent be configured? Or, is this the wrong way to think of
things? For example, I notice that if I change the value in the code:
(let* ((sz (ly:grob-property grob 'font-size 0))
so that the font is very large, then the notes will nicely nest inside
the glyph and reestablish the same spacing. If I do the same kind of
rescaling with the postscript way, it just expands over the notes.
I appreciate any thoughts that anyone would enjoy sharing. I want to
better understand this amazing program and make my manuscript writing
process smoother.
LilyPond is a work of art.
Peace,
David Froseth
On 7/3/18 3:25 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi DFro,
How about :
%CODE START
% Valentin Villanave's macro for the French-style C clef %%%
\version "2.19.82" %% "2.18.2"
altoClef =
#(ly:make-stencil
`(path 0.001
`(moveto 2.48 -3.06
lineto 2.48 -4.92
curveto 2.48 -4.96 2.45 -5.00 2.40 -5.00
lineto 2.18 -5.00
curveto 2.13 -5.00 2.10 -4.96 2.10 -4.92
lineto 2.10 4.92
curveto 2.10 4.96 2.13 5.00 2.18 5.00
lineto 2.40 5.00
curveto 2.45 5.00 2.48 4.96 2.48 4.92
lineto 2.48 2.92
curveto 2.74 2.70 3.48 2.42 3.70 2.42
curveto 4.04 2.42 4.62 2.28 4.62 4.53
curveto 4.62 5.60 4.76 6.70 5.76 6.70
curveto 6.28 6.70 6.71 6.26 6.71 5.71
curveto 6.71 5.16 6.28 4.71 5.76 4.71
curveto 5.26 4.71 5.30 4.96 5.20 5.03
curveto 5.13 5.02 5.10 4.78 5.10 4.37
lineto 5.10 3.40
curveto 5.10 1.92 4.90 0.94 4.77 0.79
curveto 4.42 0.39 3.32 0.70 2.48 0.70
lineto 2.48 -0.83
curveto 3.32 -0.83 4.42 -0.53 4.77 -0.93
curveto 4.90 -1.08 5.10 -2.06 5.10 -3.54
lineto 5.10 -4.51
curveto 5.10 -4.91 5.13 -5.16 5.20 -5.17
curveto 5.30 -5.09 5.26 -4.85 5.76 -4.85
curveto 6.28 -4.85 6.71 -5.30 6.71 -5.84
curveto 6.71 -6.40 6.28 -6.84 5.76 -6.84
curveto 4.76 -6.84 4.62 -5.74 4.62 -4.67
curveto 4.62 -2.42 4.04 -2.56 3.70 -2.56
curveto 3.48 -2.56 2.74 -2.83 2.48 -3.06
closepath
moveto 1.30 -5.00
lineto 0.08 -5.00
curveto 0.04 -5.00 0 -4.96 0 -4.92
lineto 0 4.92
curveto 0 4.96 0.04 5.00 0.08 5.00
lineto 1.30 5.00
curveto 1.34 5.00 1.38 4.96 1.38 4.92
lineto 1.38 -4.92
curveto 1.38 -4.96 1.34 -5.00 1.30 -5.00
closepath)
'round 'round #t)
(cons -0.1 5)
(cons -5 5))
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override Clef.stencil =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((sz
Re: Interactive PDF Link to Notes in Preview
Hi Anders, Federico, F: Not Notes. No such thing I have seen. You probably mean TextEdit, the basic standard supplied text editor. It's been a while since I used my Mac for lilypond, so I can't remember, but I think any text editor could be made to work. Since it now cannot due to Apple's decision (why do they keep reducing functionality?) it is no longer relevant. A: You can get tab completion plugins for PowerShell if you hunt around. Also, as mentioned, Skim works for this purpose last time I used it. https://skim-app.sourceforge.io/ Andrew On 6 July 2018 at 02:57, Anders Eriksson wrote: > > > On 2018-07-05 18:30, Federico Bruni wrote: > >> If I type lilypond and then hit TAB, it's not in the available commands >> > > ON windows the Tab completion only "sees" programs in the current > directory or if you already have entered a path, the directory the path is > pointing to. > > So if you don't get an completion then there isn't any program that begins > with 'lilypond' in the directory > > // Anders > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ugly tie
On 06.07.2018 01:02, Noeck wrote: Is this an ugly-type bug? I’d say yes. Your graphic is cropped too much, because if the right tie were a lot shorter, I’d be totally fine with this, but they’re pretty much the same length (see attachment). Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Ugly tie
Hi,
I encountered an ugly tie. What can I do to make the tie more
symmetrical (other than extra-offset or \shape - or should I just use
those in combination with \alterBroken)?
It occurs when the note is tied twice (to both sides) and there is a
line break in one of the ties.
MWE:
\version "2.19.80"
\paper { ragged-right = ##f }
{ r2 a ~ 1 ~ \break 1 }
Is this an ugly-type bug?
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Syntax
Ok, but I have to rely on the documentation. If it is written highmidtom I consider it valid. Can I use MIDI input for drums notation? On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:00 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Thomas Morley writes: > > > 2018-07-05 22:48 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > >> > >> Seen the issue, but by the way, it's also "hihat" in our definitions. > > > > True, otoh we have highfloortom and hightom .. > > Ugh. I still vote for just the doc change for now. > > -- > David Kastrup > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Syntax
Thomas Morley writes: > 2018-07-05 22:48 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> >> Seen the issue, but by the way, it's also "hihat" in our definitions. > > True, otoh we have highfloortom and hightom .. Ugh. I still vote for just the doc change for now. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Syntax
2018-07-05 22:48 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > David Kastrup writes: > >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> please always reply to all, so that others stay informed or may drop >>> into the discussion. >>> cc-ing the list again. >>> >>> 2018-07-05 22:03 GMT+02:00 ** : Here (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/percussion-notes) there's written "highmidtom". Anyway, the different syntaxes make the program flexible, but they also confuse a user approaching it for the first time. >>> > please check what you've written before accusing the program ;) >>> >>> You're right, that's sort of a bug. >>> >>> Though, what should we change, code (drumpitch-init.ly) or docs? >>> >>> I'd say it would have been best to use "highmidtom" in the code right >>> from the start. Right now I don't see why it wasn't implemented in >>> this way. >> >> himidtom seems ok to me, it's a shortcut. The alternative would be >> highmiddletom (which seems overdone). >> >>> Anyway, I suppose several users woked with "himidtom", changíng it >>> would require a convert-rule as well. >>> So I tend to change the docs. >>> >>> Opinions? >> >> See above. > > Seen the issue, but by the way, it's also "hihat" in our definitions. True, otoh we have highfloortom and hightom .. > And the very first word of your reply is "Hi," which is likely an > involuntary vote... lol Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Syntax
2018-07-05 22:29 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> Hi, >> >> please always reply to all, so that others stay informed or may drop >> into the discussion. >> cc-ing the list again. >> >> 2018-07-05 22:03 GMT+02:00 ** : >>> Here (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/percussion-notes) >>> there's written "highmidtom". >>> Anyway, the different syntaxes make the program flexible, but they also >>> confuse a user approaching it for the first time. >> please check what you've written before accusing the program ;) >> >> You're right, that's sort of a bug. >> >> Though, what should we change, code (drumpitch-init.ly) or docs? >> >> I'd say it would have been best to use "highmidtom" in the code right >> from the start. Right now I don't see why it wasn't implemented in >> this way. > > himidtom seems ok to me, it's a shortcut. The alternative would be > highmiddletom (which seems overdone). > >> Anyway, I suppose several users woked with "himidtom", changíng it >> would require a convert-rule as well. >> So I tend to change the docs. >> >> Opinions? > > See above. > > -- > David Kastrup patch's up https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5369/ Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Syntax
David Kastrup writes: > Thomas Morley writes: > >> Hi, >> >> please always reply to all, so that others stay informed or may drop >> into the discussion. >> cc-ing the list again. >> >> 2018-07-05 22:03 GMT+02:00 ** : >>> Here (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/percussion-notes) >>> there's written "highmidtom". >>> Anyway, the different syntaxes make the program flexible, but they also >>> confuse a user approaching it for the first time. >> please check what you've written before accusing the program ;) >> >> You're right, that's sort of a bug. >> >> Though, what should we change, code (drumpitch-init.ly) or docs? >> >> I'd say it would have been best to use "highmidtom" in the code right >> from the start. Right now I don't see why it wasn't implemented in >> this way. > > himidtom seems ok to me, it's a shortcut. The alternative would be > highmiddletom (which seems overdone). > >> Anyway, I suppose several users woked with "himidtom", changíng it >> would require a convert-rule as well. >> So I tend to change the docs. >> >> Opinions? > > See above. Seen the issue, but by the way, it's also "hihat" in our definitions. And the very first word of your reply is "Hi," which is likely an involuntary vote... -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Syntax
Thomas Morley writes: > Hi, > > please always reply to all, so that others stay informed or may drop > into the discussion. > cc-ing the list again. > > 2018-07-05 22:03 GMT+02:00 ** : >> Here (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/percussion-notes) >> there's written "highmidtom". >> Anyway, the different syntaxes make the program flexible, but they also >> confuse a user approaching it for the first time. > >>> please check what you've written before accusing the program ;) > > You're right, that's sort of a bug. > > Though, what should we change, code (drumpitch-init.ly) or docs? > > I'd say it would have been best to use "highmidtom" in the code right > from the start. Right now I don't see why it wasn't implemented in > this way. himidtom seems ok to me, it's a shortcut. The alternative would be highmiddletom (which seems overdone). > Anyway, I suppose several users woked with "himidtom", changíng it > would require a convert-rule as well. > So I tend to change the docs. > > Opinions? See above. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Syntax
Hi, please always reply to all, so that others stay informed or may drop into the discussion. cc-ing the list again. 2018-07-05 22:03 GMT+02:00 ** : > Here (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/percussion-notes) > there's written "highmidtom". > Anyway, the different syntaxes make the program flexible, but they also > confuse a user approaching it for the first time. >> please check what you've written before accusing the program ;) You're right, that's sort of a bug. Though, what should we change, code (drumpitch-init.ly) or docs? I'd say it would have been best to use "highmidtom" in the code right from the start. Right now I don't see why it wasn't implemented in this way. Anyway, I suppose several users woked with "himidtom", changíng it would require a convert-rule as well. So I tend to change the docs. Opinions? Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Syntax
Hi Mark, Am 05.07.2018 um 21:39 schrieb Thomas Morley: Hi, I'm writing my first score. Basically, I'm using a code example found in lilypond documentation and I'm doing some changes: \version 3.0.1 really?? This looks very much like the current version of Frescobaldi. Maybe it's obvious to you, maybe not, but you should be well aware that LilyPond "is" not Frescobaldi. LilyPond is a batch program that reads text files and engraves scores from them, Frescobaldi is one tool to help you edit these text files. I don't want to be nitpicking, but this differentiation may save you from some confusion down the road. Frescobaldi's current version is 3.0.1, LilyPond has a "stable" release 2.18.2 and a "development" release 2.19.82. In the vast majority of cases you shouldn't hesitate to use a current development release since these are not at all unstable (at least not from a practical point of view). Best wishes Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Syntax
Hi,
2018-07-05 14:40 GMT+02:00 ** :
> Hi,
> I'm writing my first score.
> Basically, I'm using a code example found in lilypond documentation and I'm
> doing some changes:
>
> \version 3.0.1
really??
>
> \header {
> title = ""
> composer = ""
> }
>
> #(define mydrums '(
> (bassdrumdefault #f -3)
> (snare default #f -1)
> (sidestick cross #f -1)
> (closedhihat cross "stopped"3)
> (halfopenhihat cross "halfopen" 1)
> (pedalhihat xcircle "stopped"2)
> (lowmidtom diamond #f 0)
> (highmidtom diamond #f 2)))
>
> one = \drummode { \time 4/4 hhc4 hhc4 hhc4 hhc4 \time 2/4 hhc4 hhc4 \time
> 3/4 hhc4 }
> two = \drummode { bd r4 ss r4 bd r4 ss}
> three = \drummode { skip skip skip skip skip skip skip tommh tomml }
> four = \drummode { }
>
> \new DrumStaff <<
> \set DrumStaff.drumStyleTable = #(alist->hash-table mydrums)
> \new DrumVoice { \voiceOne \one }
> \new DrumVoice { \voiceTwo \two }
> \new DrumVoice { \voiceTwo \three }
> \new DrumVoice { \voiceTwo \four }
>>>
>
> 1) At the third bar I had the first problem: the program can't place the
> toms in the right position and it can't visualize the diamond symbol.
please check what you've written before accusing the program ;)
`highmidtom` does not exists, it's `himidtom`
Then it works:
\version "2.19.82"
#(define mydrums '(
(bassdrumdefault #f -3)
(snare default #f -1)
(sidestick cross #f -1)
(closedhihat cross "stopped"3)
(halfopenhihat cross "halfopen" 1)
(pedalhihat xcircle "stopped"2)
(lowmidtom diamond #f 0)
(himidtomdiamond #f 2)))
one =
\drummode { \time 4/4 hhc4 hhc4 hhc4 hhc4 \time 2/4 hhc4 hhc4 \time 3/4 hhc4 }
two =
\drummode { bd r4 ss r4 bd r4 ss tommh tomml }
\new DrumStaff
\with { drumStyleTable = #(alist->hash-table mydrums) }
<<
\new DrumVoice { \voiceOne \one }
\new DrumVoice { \voiceTwo \two }
>>
> 2) I like this kind of syntax, with the 'mydrums' list, but probably there
> are more efficient ways to write down this score. Can you modify this one as
> an example to show me how you do it?
>
> Thanks.
You've already found the relevant sectio in the docs. There's an
LSR-snippet which you may study as well.
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1033
Cheers,
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: http://lilypond.org/help-us.html afunctional
Graham Percival writes: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:21:25PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> "Phil Holmes" writes: >> > I'm slightly surprised that the build picks up the location of those >> > pages from that part of the version, but obviously it does. A simple >> > fix for the next build would be to align the versions given by the two >> > expressions, but could you have a think about why those pages pick up >> > different locations from all the others? >> >> I am just as surprised as you are. I would have thought that the >> VERSION_STABLE and VERSION_DEVEL lines are exactly used for figuring out >> the web sites to link to while MAJOR_VERSION/MINOR_VERSION/PATCH_LEVEL >> is what gets baked into the binary. > > Commit 70adadcf60fa2571d3148115af5d7e96d80d57a5. > > I suspect that the issue is that we only want a string in the form > "2.19", and it was easier to create such a string by concatenating > MAJOR_VERSION and MINOR_VERSION, instead of taking VERSION_STABLE > of "2.19.65" and removing the final ".xy" Hm. I've done a change using VERSION_DEVEL locally but I am not sure whether there is one valid strategy for both development and stable releases. I am not sure I understand the problem. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: http://lilypond.org/help-us.html afunctional
Graham Percival writes: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:21:25PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> "Phil Holmes" writes: >> > I'm slightly surprised that the build picks up the location of those >> > pages from that part of the version, but obviously it does. A simple >> > fix for the next build would be to align the versions given by the two >> > expressions, but could you have a think about why those pages pick up >> > different locations from all the others? >> >> I am just as surprised as you are. I would have thought that the >> VERSION_STABLE and VERSION_DEVEL lines are exactly used for figuring out >> the web sites to link to while MAJOR_VERSION/MINOR_VERSION/PATCH_LEVEL >> is what gets baked into the binary. > > Commit 70adadcf60fa2571d3148115af5d7e96d80d57a5. > > I suspect that the issue is that we only want a string in the form > "2.19", and it was easier to create such a string by concatenating > MAJOR_VERSION and MINOR_VERSION, instead of taking VERSION_STABLE > of "2.19.65" and removing the final ".xy" Thanks for the pointer. I try to use Make's "basename" function for removing the final .xy . That's hackish, so what. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: http://lilypond.org/help-us.html afunctional
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:21:25PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > I'm slightly surprised that the build picks up the location of those > > pages from that part of the version, but obviously it does. A simple > > fix for the next build would be to align the versions given by the two > > expressions, but could you have a think about why those pages pick up > > different locations from all the others? > > I am just as surprised as you are. I would have thought that the > VERSION_STABLE and VERSION_DEVEL lines are exactly used for figuring out > the web sites to link to while MAJOR_VERSION/MINOR_VERSION/PATCH_LEVEL > is what gets baked into the binary. Commit 70adadcf60fa2571d3148115af5d7e96d80d57a5. I suspect that the issue is that we only want a string in the form "2.19", and it was easier to create such a string by concatenating MAJOR_VERSION and MINOR_VERSION, instead of taking VERSION_STABLE of "2.19.65" and removing the final ".xy" Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Interactive PDF Link to Notes in Preview
On 2018-07-05 18:30, Federico Bruni wrote: If I type lilypond and then hit TAB, it's not in the available commands ON windows the Tab completion only "sees" programs in the current directory or if you already have entered a path, the directory the path is pointing to. So if you don't get an completion then there isn't any program that begins with 'lilypond' in the directory // Anders ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Interactive PDF Link to Notes in Preview
Il giorno gio 5 lug 2018 alle 16:57, Andrew Bernard <"andrew.bernard"@gmail.com> ha scritto: I do sometimes use a Mac, and I do also now recall that Apple removed that functionality in Preview in Sierra, so nothing can be done to fix it. Skim seems to be one good solution. But how about Frescobaldi? I jumped in this discussion, as a non-Mac-user, because I'm writing a blog post which includes a part about using editors other than Frescobaldi. The Usage manual¹ doesn't say that the instructions for point-and-click are valid for Linux only, so I though that a similar mechanism could work at least in Mac (and maybe on Windows). ¹ http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/configuring-the-system-for-point-and-click.html I've now learned that: - it used to work in Mac before Sierra, but I wonder if you were able to set an editor different from Notes... - it doesn't work in Windows or at least I'm not sure how to make it work. I have added lilypond installation directory to the path, in fact I can run lilypond in the PowerShell. But I cannot run lilypond-invoke-editor. If I type lilypond and then hit TAB, it's not in the available commands. If on Linux I do: $ file `which lilypond-invoke-editor` /usr/bin/lilypond-invoke-editor: a /usr/bin/guile1.8 -s script, ASCII text executable Any Windows expert who can help? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Multi-part score
You could also make a book like this:
\book {
\header {
title = "MY BOOK"
}
\score {
\header {
piece = "Piece 1"
}
% music 1
\layout {
% options 1
}
\score {
\header {
piece = "Piece 2"
}
% music 2
\layout {
% options 2
}
And you can change all the layout (or paper) for each new movement.
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Interactive PDF Link to Notes in Preview
Hi Zone, For some reason I can't see your original post anymore. Anyway, since somebody mentioned Skim, I now recall there was a length discussion of this exact same topic in the list a while ago. It would be worth you while to look at the archives. I do sometimes use a Mac, and I do also now recall that Apple removed that functionality in Preview in Sierra, so nothing can be done to fix it. Skim seems to be one good solution. But how about Frescobaldi? Andrew On 4 July 2018 at 04:04, Federico Bruni wrote: > Hello Zon > > Il giorno mar 3 lug 2018 alle 18:47, Zone Dremik > ha scritto: > >> Hello, >> After a recent upgrade to my computer, the function that links music >> notes (and lyrics) in the PDF viewer, to the text in the Lilypond files, >> has stopped working. >> >> > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Multi-part score
Hi Joshua, > Is there a way to have multiple scores in a score with different layout > options, and without using lilypond-book or book part? \bookpart works well for me… Maybe post a MWE, so we can see how your code might be improved? Cheers, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Multi-part score
Oops, need to forward to list…
-- Forwarded message -
From: Vaughan McAlley
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018, 00:05
Subject: Re: Multi-part score
To: Joshua Armenta
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, 22:56 Joshua Armenta, wrote:
> Hi Ponders,
>
> Is there a way to have multiple scores in a score with different layout
> options, and without using lilypond-book or book part?
>
> Basically, I have a multimovment work for large chamber orchestra that I'm
> typesetting, and some of the movements I want to use max-systems-per-page =
> 1 (Mov 3 is keyboard and tenor, movement 4 is full ensemble, so 23 staves
> per system).
>
> I wasn't able to get bookpart to work without it invoking full headers
> every time.
>
> --
> *Josh Armenta*
> Composer, Conductor & Scholar
> Production Director, The Computer Music Consort
> San Jose, CA
> http://www.josharmenta.com
>
> "If I cannot fly, let me sing." - Stephen Sondheim
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I just looked at my current multi-movement piece. Each \bookpart (except
the first) has:
\header {
title = ##f
subtitle = "My movement name"
…
}
Then I can give each movement its own \paper settings.
Vaughan
>
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Interactive PDF Link to Notes in Preview
Hello, After a recent upgrade to my computer, the function that links music notes (and lyrics) in the PDF viewer, to the text in the Lilypond files, has stopped working. I believe the since Mac Os Sierra came around, Apple has discontinued the ability for users to click notes on the music in Preview. I ran in to the same problem a while back. So, I have been using the app called Skim that works with note clicking. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Syntax
Hi,
I'm writing my first score.
Basically, I'm using a code example found in lilypond documentation and I'm
doing some changes:
\version 3.0.1
\header {
title = ""
composer = ""
}
#(define mydrums '(
(bassdrumdefault #f -3)
(snare default #f -1)
(sidestick cross #f -1)
(closedhihat cross "stopped"3)
(halfopenhihat cross "halfopen" 1)
(pedalhihat xcircle "stopped"2)
(lowmidtom diamond #f 0)
(highmidtom diamond #f 2)))
one = \drummode { \time 4/4 hhc4 hhc4 hhc4 hhc4 \time 2/4 hhc4 hhc4 \time
3/4 hhc4 }
two = \drummode { bd r4 ss r4 bd r4 ss}
three = \drummode { skip skip skip skip skip skip skip tommh tomml }
four = \drummode { }
\new DrumStaff <<
\set DrumStaff.drumStyleTable = #(alist->hash-table mydrums)
\new DrumVoice { \voiceOne \one }
\new DrumVoice { \voiceTwo \two }
\new DrumVoice { \voiceTwo \three }
\new DrumVoice { \voiceTwo \four }
>>
1) At the third bar I had the first problem: the program can't place the
toms in the right position and it can't visualize the diamond symbol.
2) I like this kind of syntax, with the 'mydrums' list, but probably there
are more efficient ways to write down this score. Can you modify this one
as an example to show me how you do it?
Thanks.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Multi-part score
Hi Ponders, Is there a way to have multiple scores in a score with different layout options, and without using lilypond-book or book part? Basically, I have a multimovment work for large chamber orchestra that I'm typesetting, and some of the movements I want to use max-systems-per-page = 1 (Mov 3 is keyboard and tenor, movement 4 is full ensemble, so 23 staves per system). I wasn't able to get bookpart to work without it invoking full headers every time. -- *Josh Armenta* Composer, Conductor & Scholar Production Director, The Computer Music Consort San Jose, CA http://www.josharmenta.com "If I cannot fly, let me sing." - Stephen Sondheim ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: question about cross-staff stems
James Bailey-5 wrote
> What I'm looking for is something like this:
> \include "deutsch.ly"
> \version "2.19.65"
>
> \score {
> \new PianoStaff <<
> \new Staff = "RH" \relative c'' { \voiceOne
>
> 4~ q8 q~ q4~ q8 q }
> \new Staff = "LH" \relative c' {
> \clef bass
> <<
> \new Voice = "crossing" { \autoBeamOff
> \crossStaff \repeat unfold 2 {
> \change Staff = "RH" \voiceTwo s8
>
> 8
>
>
>
> } }
> \new Voice = "notCrossing" { \autoBeamOff
> \change Staff = "LH"
> \voiceTwo \repeat unfold 2 { c,8[ g'] g[ g] } }
> \new Voice = "ties" { \voiceFour \repeat unfold
> 2 { \stemUp c,4~ \once
> \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #-2.0 c8 r } }
> >> \oneVoice
> }
> >>
> \layout { \context { \PianoStaff \consists #Span_stem_engraver } }
> }
>
> But that's a lot of manual adjustment and essentially the entire piece has
> this contour.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
Interesting. However I wonder why you'd need the c,4~ c8 at the LH since it
cannot be held? Don't you think a pedal mark could be used instead and give
your writting more legibility?
Also, I don't understand why you have used NoteColumn.force-hshift because
it makes very unclear where the beat is. If it is really the way you want to
engrave it, I found the default result better.
Anyway, if you really want to write those adjustments through all the piece,
maybe the use of variables would be necessary.
Several alternative ideas:
\include "deutsch.ly"
\version "2.19.65"
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "RH" \relative c'' { \voiceOne 4~ q8 q~
q4~ q8 q }
\new Staff = "LH" \relative c' {
\clef bass
<<
\new Voice = "crossing" { \autoBeamOff
\crossStaff \repeat unfold 2 { \change Staff = "RH" \voiceTwo s8 8 } }
\new Voice = "notCrossing" { \autoBeamOff
\change Staff = "LH" \voiceTwo \repeat unfold 2 { c,8[\sustainOn g'] g[
g]\sustainOff } }
>> \oneVoice
}
>>
\layout { \context { \PianoStaff \consists #Span_stem_engraver } }
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "RH" \relative c'' { \voiceOne 4~ q8 q~
q4~ q8 q }
\new Staff = "LH" \relative c' {
\clef bass
<<
\new Voice = "crossing" { \autoBeamOff
\crossStaff \repeat unfold 2 { \change Staff = "RH" \voiceTwo s8 8 } }
\new Voice = "notCrossing" { \autoBeamOff
\change Staff = "LH" \voiceTwo \repeat unfold 2 { c,8[ g'] g[ g] } }
\new Voice = "ties" { \voiceFour \repeat
unfold 2 { \stemUp c,4~ c8 r } }
>> \oneVoice
}
>>
\layout { \context { \PianoStaff \consists #Span_stem_engraver } }
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "RH" \relative c'' { \voiceOne 4~ q8 q~
q4~ q8 q }
\new Staff = "LH" \relative c' {
\clef bass
<<
\new Voice = "crossing" { \autoBeamOff
\crossStaff \repeat unfold 2 { \change Staff = "RH" \voiceTwo s8 8 } }
\new Voice = "notCrossing" { \autoBeamOff
\change Staff = "LH" \voiceTwo \repeat unfold 2 { c,8[ g'] g[ g] } }
\new Voice = "ties" { \voiceFour \repeat
unfold 2 { \stemUp c,4. r8 } }
>> \oneVoice
}
>>
\layout { \context { \PianoStaff \consists #Span_stem_engraver } }
}
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Interactive PDF Link to Notes in Preview
Yes, it's possible that LilyPond application for Mac may become incompatible with recent Mac versions. Please keep the list in Cc, as I'm not a Mac user and cannot help you. Il giorno gio 5 lug 2018 alle 9:02, Zone Dremik ha scritto: I am not using a text editor at all. For the last nine years, I have been running the Lilypond application through the standard Macintosh GUI. I have never needed to use any command line functions, or interact with any helper scripts or apps. (I don't actually see any other process running other than the Lilypond app). The app has always created, saved, and compiled the files containing the lilypond code ( with .ly extension). When the output PDF is created, Lilypond communicates with the operating system to open the PDF in the Apple Brand PDF viewer called PREVIEW. Clicking the notes in preview would normally cause the corresponding .ly file to open in Lilypond, with the specific code highlighted within the text. It has worked beautifully all these years, through several Mac system upgrades. However, I see from the Lilypond download page that the most recent system support is for Mac OS 10.4, while the current system is up to OS 13.0 is it possible that Lilypond is becoming incompatible with Apple products? On Tue, 7/3/18, Federico Bruni wrote: Subject: Re: Interactive PDF Link to Notes in Preview To: "Zone Dremik" Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2018, 2:14 PM Il giorno mar 3 lug 2018 alle 20:04, Federico Bruni ha scritto: > Hello Zon > > Il giorno mar 3 lug 2018 alle 18:47, Zone Dremik > ha scritto: >> Hello, >> After a recent upgrade to my computer, the function that links music >> notes (and lyrics) in the PDF viewer, to the text in the Lilypond >> files, has stopped working. >> > > Which text editor are you using? > How did you set your system to enable point-and-click? In other > words, what's the command you assigned to the EDITOR or LYEDITOR > variables? > > Read: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/configuring-the-system-for-point-and-click.html > > (this page was changed recently, but the change has not been released > yet) > Sorry, it's written in the subject: it's Notes. I'm not a Mac user and cannot help much. You should check if Notes supports opening a file in a precise location (line and column) and see what's the correct syntax to use. Are you sure it used to work with Notes in the past or you are making confusion with something else? I may help if you want to use editors which can run on multiple operating systems, including Linux. The patch I mentioned before is here: https://codereview.appspot.com/357720043/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
