Re: Colored box behind a single note

2019-07-21 Thread Werner LEMBERG

> I'm not sure if that helps you with your case (probably not), but
> you should at least know that this snippet has by now evolved into
> this openLilyLib package: https://github.com/openlilylib/analysis/,
> https://github.com/openlilylib/analysis/wiki/Frames

Thanks for the info!


Werner

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Colored box behind a single note

2019-07-21 Thread Urs Liska


Am 21.07.19 um 19:04 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:

Using

   http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1000

I wonder how to get the effect for a single note.  Ideally, I would
like to write

   \genericSpan <...parameters ...>
   e\startGroup\endGroup

but since `\genericSpan' uses a `HorizontalBracket' grob, this fails;
it needs at least two notes.

I wasn't able to find a suitable solution in the web; IMHO, it would
be a quite useful addition to this snippet.



I'm not sure if that helps you with your case (probably not), but you 
should at least know that this snippet has by now evolved into this 
openLilyLib package: https://github.com/openlilylib/analysis/, 
https://github.com/openlilylib/analysis/wiki/Frames


I can only guess that this framework would make it easier to add the 
functionality you think of.


Urs




 Werner

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Colored box behind a single note

2019-07-21 Thread Werner LEMBERG

Using

  http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1000

I wonder how to get the effect for a single note.  Ideally, I would
like to write

  \genericSpan <...parameters ...>
  e\startGroup\endGroup

but since `\genericSpan' uses a `HorizontalBracket' grob, this fails;
it needs at least two notes.

I wasn't able to find a suitable solution in the web; IMHO, it would
be a quite useful addition to this snippet.


Werner

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Problem with merging whole measure rests

2019-07-21 Thread Malte Meyn

Hi David,

if I understand correctly you see a problem with the 
Merge_rests_engraver (your attached file from-NR.ly)?


That engraver didn’t merge MultiMeasureRests until 2.19.65 and does so 
since 2.19.80 (the first prerelease for 2.20.0, hence the version number 
jump from 65 to 80). However, merging of MultiMeasureRests gives them an 
incorrect vertical position in 2.19.80–2.19.83. The not yet released 
2.21.0 fixes this.


@someone who knows about such things: Would it make sense to cherry-pick 
that fix into the stable/2.20 branch?


Cheers,
Malte

Am 20.07.19 um 18:55 schrieb David Wright:

Obviously 2.18 can't run the NR example, so I've attached some
files that demonstrate the old fix and the new manifestation.
IOW the first two should print correctly but the third prints
as in the NR.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user