Re: conflict in dymanics signs
On 2023-04-06 2:26 pm, Dario Marrini wrote:
Thanks Aaron,
but, forgive me because I' wasn't clear in my request, my goal is to
get a
MIDI file performing the crescendo while making the right expression
inside
of it, then my request; if it'd be possible get it while keeping the
original writing it'd be better
I am not sure LilyPond is able to accurately perform this passage as
intended via MIDI.
If I were sequencing this, I would use a combination of CC messages for
both channel volume to perform the overall crescendo up to the
fortissimo and expression level to perform the swelling/damping of the
paired hairpins. (Channel or key aftertouch is another option, but that
requires a synth/patch that support it.) That is not to say this is the
only way to sequence this passage, but LilyPond is going to be limited
to note-on velocities.
The crescendo and decrescendo events are indeed in conflict and cannot
coexist on the same Voice. You could move the \cresc and terminating
\ff to another Voice or a Dynamics context (as shown below):
<< { b\> g\! es\< g\! f\> es\! b\< es\! f2\) f-> f-> f-> }
\new Dynamics { s2*7\cresc s2\ff } >>
Note that the \cresc above results in a dynamics line spanner which you
could remove:
s2*7 -\tweak DynamicTextSpanner.style #'none \cresc
Also note the fortissimo lives vertically aligned to the "cresc." text.
But a little tweak moves it closer to the note:
s2 -\tweak Y-offset #1 \ff
Of course, I think the line spanner helps clarify the passage, so I
would keep it and leave the \ff position alone.
-- Aaron Hill
Re: conflict in dymanics signs
Thanks Aaron, but, forgive me because I' wasn't clear in my request, my goal is to get a MIDI file performing the crescendo while making the right expression inside of it, then my request; if it'd be possible get it while keeping the original writing it'd be better cheers Il giorno gio 6 apr 2023 alle ore 23:22 Aaron Hill ha scritto: > On 2023-04-06 1:39 pm, Dario Marrini wrote: > > Hi lilypond people, > > I'm trying to transcribe an orchestral part; this is a solo Oboe part; > > there is a "cresc" ending in a "ff", but in the meanwhile there are > > other dynamics signs (expression?); I don't know how to combine the > > general crescendo with single dynamics expression signs; lilypond > > warning me about a conflict, and it ignores the two 'decrescendo' > > signs; how to do for nesting expression signs inside the longer and > > general crescendo? I would get it keeping the score original signs. > > > > the original > > > > the lily output : > > > > the code : > > > > as'\(\! b\cresc\> g\! es\< g\! f\> es\! b\< es\! f2\) f-> f-> f->\ff > > Probably the easiest option is to use markup for the "cresc." text: > > >b\>_\markup \italic "cresc." > > > > -- Aaron Hill >
Re: conflict in dymanics signs
On 2023-04-06 1:39 pm, Dario Marrini wrote: Hi lilypond people, I'm trying to transcribe an orchestral part; this is a solo Oboe part; there is a "cresc" ending in a "ff", but in the meanwhile there are other dynamics signs (expression?); I don't know how to combine the general crescendo with single dynamics expression signs; lilypond warning me about a conflict, and it ignores the two 'decrescendo' signs; how to do for nesting expression signs inside the longer and general crescendo? I would get it keeping the score original signs. the original the lily output : the code : as'\(\! b\cresc\> g\! es\< g\! f\> es\! b\< es\! f2\) f-> f-> f->\ff Probably the easiest option is to use markup for the "cresc." text: b\>_\markup \italic "cresc." -- Aaron Hill
conflict in dymanics signs
Hi lilypond people, I'm trying to transcribe an orchestral part; this is a solo Oboe part; there is a "cresc" ending in a "ff", but in the meanwhile there are other dynamics signs (expression?); I don't know how to combine the general crescendo with single dynamics expression signs; lilypond warning me about a conflict, and it ignores the two 'decrescendo' signs; how to do for nesting expression signs inside the longer and general crescendo? I would get it keeping the score original signs. the original [image: image.png] the lily output : [image: image.png] the code : as'\(\! b\cresc\> g\! es\< g\! f\> es\! b\< es\! f2\) f-> f-> f->\ff thanks all
Re: keep measures on the same line
Hello Jean, > Sometimes I want to keep some measures on the same line. To do this I use > \nobreaks and I set the fontsize manually by trial and error. Isn't there > an easier way? > > Before this group of measures, put > > \autoLineBreaksOff > > [] > Using \autoLineBreaksOff lilypond stops to automatically break the line but it doesn't change the notes size. Anyway, nice to know :) Merci Jean! >
