Re: Beaming question

[James.Correa]

I think this is what you are looking for:

\version "2.22.2"

\score {
\absolute {

\tuplet 3/2 { f ''16 [ c'' \once \set stemRightBeamCount = #1 f'' } \once \set 
stemLeftBeamCount = #1 c'' f'' ) ] | %m67
}
}

---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, November 27th, 2022 at 13:44, Molly Preston 
 wrote:

> I am working with a texture of triplet 16ths that occasionally are duple 
> 16ths. I am wondering if there is a way to turn the beam into a single beam 
> between the second f'' in the triplet to the c'' in the below example. I'm 
> not sure what that's called and couldn't find it in the notation manual. It 
> is written that way in the original score. (This is an orchestration project 
> for school.)
>
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \score {
> \absolute {
>
> \tuplet 3/2 { f ''16 c'' f'' } c'' f'' ) | %m67
> }
> }
>
> Any help is appreciated!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Molly

Re: Problem rendering all scores

[James.Correa]

Thanks H.S.Teoh and David Wright for your replies!

Teoh you were right, it wasn´t related to lilypond...I look at the manjaro 
forum link you send me and applied the solution they suggested and worked!
I thought was something with lilypond because was the only application I had a 
problem, sorry for the noise...

David, you are right, I misspoke, I did a full system upgrade, not just python, 
in fact python had nothing to do with it. Next time I will think before I write!

Thanks again!!
All the best,

James

---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

Sent with ProtonMail secure email.

--- Original Message ---

On Tuesday, March 22nd, 2022 at 8:39 PM, David Wright 
 wrote:

> On Tue 22 Mar 2022 at 14:19:59 (-0700), H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 08:36:45PM +, James.Correa wrote:
> >
> > > I start to have this problem with lilypond after an update to
> > >
> > > python 3.8 , I am on Manjaro KDE.
> > >
> > > Every time I try to engrave a score I got this message:
> > >
> > > Starting lilypond 2.23.5 [Kintsugi-James-Correa.ly]...
> > >
> > > /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: error while loading shared
> > >
> > > libraries: libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> > >
> > > directory
> > >
> > > Exited with return code 127.
> > >
> > > I have no idea what is it or how to fix, can someone help?
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > This problem does not seem related to lilypond itself. This may help:
> >
> > https://forum.manjaro.org/t/apg-error-while-loading-shared-libraries-libcrypt-so-1/104352/4
> >
> > If that doesn't help, you may need to install a newer version of
> >
> > lilypond from the Manjaro archives, that is built against a newer
> >
> > version of libcrypt.so.1.
> >
> > The underlying problem is that your Python upgrade also replaced/removed
> >
> > a system library (libcrypt.so.1); so either you need to reinstall this
> >
> > library, or you need a newer build of lilypond that doesn't depend on
> >
> > this library (it presumably depends on the newer library).
>
> If Manjaro is at all like Debian, it may be that a libcrypt package
>
> has been split off from libc6, and somebody forgot to add the
>
> dependency. I'm surprised that just upgrading Python would do that.
>
> I would try and get advice from Manjaro users who must be hitting this
>
> problem because lots of software will use this package to do hashing.
>
> Debian parallel:
>
> buster:
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 1 2019 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1 
> -> libcrypt-2.28.so
>
> $ dpkg -S lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt-2.28.so
>
> libc6:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt-2.28.so
>
> (ie, in the libc6 package)
>
> bullseye:
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Apr 18 2021 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1 
> -> libcrypt.so.1.1.0
>
> $ dpkg -S /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1.1.0
>
> libcrypt1:amd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1.1.0
>
> (ie, in the libcrypt1 package)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David.

Problem rendering all scores

[James.Correa]

Hi everybody,

I start to have this problem with lilypond after an update to python 3.8 , I am 
on Manjaro KDE.
Every time I try to engrave a score I got this message:

Starting lilypond 2.23.5 [Kintsugi-James-Correa.ly]...

/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: error while loading shared libraries: 
libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Exited with return code 127.

I have no idea what is it or how to fix, can someone help?

All the best,
James

---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) secure email.

Re: Stemless noteheads

[James.Correa]

Hi Stefano,

You can use:

\hide Stem

---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email.

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, February 11th, 2021 at 02:36, stefano franchi 
 wrote:

> I feel very stupid, but I just spent an hour reading through the manuals, 
> searching, and so on, and I can't find a way to make stemless notes (as they 
> are often used, for instance, to indicate pitch sequences in a text-based 
> discussion, or as an aside in a score to indicate perhaps an uncommon scale, 
> etc.).
>
> There must be a quick and fast solution, given Lilypond's awesome power, but 
> I just can't seem to find it. The closest I got was to override 
> Stem.thickness, but apparently it cannot be set to 0---a faint stem is 
> printed nonetheless.
>
> --
>
> __
> Stefano Franchi
>
> [stefano.fran...@gmail.com](mailto:stef...@tamu.edu)
> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stefano_Franchi

Re: Lilypond stable release candidate now available

[James.Correa]

Good morning, well at least in my part of the world...

I am using 2.21.80 for a while and until now I have no issues to report. So far 
everything is working well.
My system is:

desktop: Ubuntu Studio 20.10 (AMD processor)
laptops: Kubuntu 20.04 with Ubuntu Studio installed on top ( Dell inspiron and 
MacBook Pro, both intel i5 different generations)

They are all running lilypond 2.21.80 with Frescobaldi

All the best,

James




---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Sunday, November 15th, 2020 at 8:54 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld  
wrote:

> Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 15:05 + schrieb Phil Holmes:
>
> > We are pleased to announce that Lilypond 2.21.80 has now been
> >
> > released and is available to download and install.  This is the first
> >
> > release candidate for the next stable version: 2.22.0, so we would be
> >
> > grateful if as many users as possible could install and test it.
>
> Pinging this message to bump its visibility. You're all testing your
>
> scores with this release candidate, aren't you?
>
> I'm not aware of major problems reported so far, so this version can't
>
> be completely broken and should be safe for testing purposes (if that's
>
> a fear that held you back so far). In case you haven't already, now is
>
> your chance to report problems that should be fixed before declaring it
>
> stable in a not-so-distant future!
>
> Jonas
>
> P.S.: You're of course also welcome to report that everything "just
>
> works" (tm)...

Re: OLL and git

[James.Correa]

Thank you Andrew for keeping OLL alive!
I'm not a programmer, but as a OLL user (mainly \shapeII, notation-snippets and 
custom-music-fonts),I am kin to help.
All the best,

James

---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Sunday, October 11th, 2020 at 6:19 AM, Andrew Bernard 
 wrote:

> To all interested in OLL. as I am starting this anew, in effect, I am
>
> at the moment considering moving to Gitlab instead of Github. There is
>
> precedent for this - lilypond is there! (not that that is directly
>
> related to OLL). The current github organisation has been orphaned as
>
> far as I can see, and for me to do the work and make the improvements
>
> I see I prefer to move to Gitlab, so I can have complete management
>
> control. Likewise, openlilylib.org has been removed, and I have
>
> registered openlilylib.space and I am building a new website today,
>
> which will have documentation, a blog, and support material and so on,
>
> and anything else people may want.
>
> My career has been in UNIX software development and IT Enterprise
>
> Architecture. I am critically aware of the impact that changes can
>
> have on people and existing code. However, I have been unhappy, as an
>
> end user, with OLL git being fragmented into a number of repos. This
>
> makes it harder than need be for beginners and people, and part of the
>
> whole reason I am taking this on is to enhance the uptake and utility
>
> for lilypond users, so I want to unify the work into one repo. There's
>
> no criticism of what is there, but I think it 'just grew'. Now, making
>
> a change like this would mean people will have to re-org their code a
>
> bit, but on reflection I don't think this is a big deal or a big job,
>
> and to move forward sometimes breaking changes need to be made.
>
> I will of course keep all the very valuable existing code modules -
>
> nothing will change there, except I will complete the move to make all
>
> the snippets package compliant modules.
>
> Changes like this often cause an uproar, but the existing github will
>
> still be around, and people can move as and when they see fit, and all
>
> new development and contributions should occur on the new Gitlab repo.
>
> [It's not ready yet - I only started in on this with definite intent
>
> today.]
>
> Andrew

Re: Error on 2.21.6

[James.Correa]

Harm,

I found the problem. I am using the Metric Modulation Function by Peter Bjuhr 
and it is not working well with version 2.21. Why is causing trouble is beyond 
my knowledge of scheme. but I took it of and the score rendered without 
problems.
Its really a shame because i like this function.

All the best,

James


---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:02 PM, James.Correa 
 wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
>
> I had done it but still get the same error...
>
> James
>
>
> --
>
> James Correa
> Composer - guitarist - sound designer
> http://www.jamescorrea.net
> http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Thursday, September 17, 2020 4:51 PM, Thomas Morley 
> thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Am Do., 17. Sept. 2020 um 21:44 Uhr schrieb James.Correa
> > james.cor...@protonmail.com:
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > > I updated to 2.21.5 and today to 2.21.6 and got this error in a score 
> > > that work fine on 2.20:
> > > Follow log output:
> > > 
> > > Starting lilypond 2.21.6 [Amazonia2.ly]...
> > > Processing `/home/james/Documents/Lilypond_scores/Catarina 
> > > Ciranda/Catarina - Amazonia/Amazonia2.ly'
> > > Parsing...
> > > Interpreting 
> > > music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][152][160][168][176][184][184]
> > > Preprocessing graphical objects...
> > > /home/james/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/init.ly:74:2: error: 
> > > wrong type for argument 1. Expecting duration, found "4"
> > > ==
> > > (let ((book-handler (if (defined? 'default-toplevel-book-handler)
> > > /home/james/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/parser-ly-from-scheme.scm:24:18:
> > >  In procedure reverse! in expression (ly:parse-string-expression clone 
> > > lily-string ...):
> > > /home/james/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/parser-ly-from-scheme.scm:24:18:
> > >  Wrong type argument in position 1: (0.9 "4" . #f)
> > > Exited with return code 1.
> > > =
> > > It doesn't seems to be an error in my score, I don know how to fix it can 
> > > some one help me?
> > > All the best,
> > > James
> > > James Correa
> > > Composer - guitarist - sound designer
> > > http://www.jamescorrea.net
> > > http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/
> > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> >
> > convert-ly is your friend ;)
> > Cheers,
> > Harm

Re: Error on 2.21.6

[James.Correa]

Hi Thomas,

I had done it but still get the same error...

James


---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, September 17, 2020 4:51 PM, Thomas Morley 
 wrote:

> Am Do., 17. Sept. 2020 um 21:44 Uhr schrieb James.Correa
> james.cor...@protonmail.com:
>
> > Hello all,
> > I updated to 2.21.5 and today to 2.21.6 and got this error in a score that 
> > work fine on 2.20:
> > Follow log output:
> >
> > 
> >
> > Starting lilypond 2.21.6 [Amazonia2.ly]...
> > Processing `/home/james/Documents/Lilypond_scores/Catarina Ciranda/Catarina 
> > - Amazonia/Amazonia2.ly'
> > Parsing...
> > Interpreting 
> > music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][152][160][168][176][184][184]
> > Preprocessing graphical objects...
> > /home/james/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/init.ly:74:2: error: 
> > wrong type for argument 1. Expecting duration, found "4"
> >
> > ==
> >
> > (let ((book-handler (if (defined? 'default-toplevel-book-handler)
> > /home/james/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/parser-ly-from-scheme.scm:24:18:
> >  In procedure reverse! in expression (ly:parse-string-expression clone 
> > lily-string ...):
> > /home/james/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/parser-ly-from-scheme.scm:24:18:
> >  Wrong type argument in position 1: (0.9 "4" . #f)
> > Exited with return code 1.
> >
> > =
> >
> > It doesn't seems to be an error in my score, I don know how to fix it can 
> > some one help me?
> > All the best,
> > James
> >
> > James Correa
> > Composer - guitarist - sound designer
> > http://www.jamescorrea.net
> > http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/
> > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> convert-ly is your friend ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Harm

Error on 2.21.6

[James.Correa]

Hello all,
I updated to 2.21.5 and today to 2.21.6 and got this error in a score that work 
fine on 2.20:
Follow log output:
=
Starting lilypond 2.21.6 [Amazonia2.ly]...
Processing `/home/james/Documents/Lilypond_scores/Catarina Ciranda/Catarina - 
Amazonia/Amazonia2.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting 
music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][152][160][168][176][184][184]
Preprocessing graphical objects...
/home/james/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/init.ly:74:2: error: wrong 
type for argument 1. Expecting duration, found "4"
#
(let ((book-handler (if (defined? 'default-toplevel-book-handler)
/home/james/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/parser-ly-from-scheme.scm:24:18:
 In procedure reverse! in expression (ly:parse-string-expression clone 
lily-string ...):
/home/james/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/parser-ly-from-scheme.scm:24:18:
 Wrong type argument in position 1: (0.9 "4" . #f)
Exited with return code 1.
=
It doesn't seems to be an error in my score, I don know how to fix it can some 
one help me?

All the best,

James

---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

Re: naming a glyph

[James.Correa]

Hi Freeman,

If I understand you correct this might help you:

http://lilypondblog.org/2014/04/using-special-characters-from-smufl-fonts/

All the best,

James
---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On May 20, 2018 11:39 PM, Freeman Gilmore  wrote:

> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Andrew Bernard  
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Freeman,
>>
>> Let us know what you re trying to do. Why do you want to create a glyph?
>>
>> Are you new to lilypond? If so, welcome to the Pond!
>>
>> Andrew
>
> Andrew and others that have responded, thank you:
>
> I will start over.   What I was trying to say is that the # (my example) is a 
> new glyph to Lilypond; and it has the name “accidentals.sharp” and the code 
> “is” (and others).   I am trying to understand this because I want to create 
> some accidentals of my own.
>
> I assume that the “#” is not ‘markup’.  I do not understand what ‘markup’ is; 
> I do know that is has something to do with text.
>
> Also, I know that some of the accident are created with markup.
>
> My original question was how is a glyph correctly named?  I have read 
> mf/README several times I think I have that part.
>
> Then there is the code name, what is the correct way to name the code?   Why 
> two names; why not just the code name?
>
> For my use I would like to be able to use one or more glyphs with a note.
>
> I would like to start by using an unused accidental section of the SMuFL 
> Unicode.
>
> Thank you,
>
> ƒg___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Custom woodwind-diagram

[James.Correa]

Hi Sven
I did this to use as a template for notate some multiphonics in a piece for 
flute. I added one more hole to match your instrument. It is not a function 
yet, you have to write all each time you use it, but can be turned into one by 
someone with more skills.

%%
\version "2.19.80"

multiF =  \markup {
  \left-column {\draw-circle #0.5 #0.2 ##f}
  \left-column { \draw-circle #0.5 #0.2 ##f
\vspace #-0.5
\draw-circle #0.5 #0.2 ##t
\vspace #-0.5
\draw-circle #0.5 #0.2 ##t
\vspace #-0.5
\draw-line #' ( 1.3 . 0)
\vspace #-0.5
\draw-circle #0.5 #0.2 ##f
\vspace #-0.5
\draw-circle #0.5 #0.2 ##f
\vspace #-0.5
\draw-circle #0.5 #0.2 ##f
\vspace #-0.5
\draw-circle #0.5 #0.2 ##f}

}

{c'4 ^\multiFa}

%

I hope it will help you.
James

---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http://wp.ufpel.edu.br/labcomp/

>  Original Message 
> Subject: Custom woodwind-diagram
> Local Time: November 21, 2017 1:58 PM
> UTC Time: November 21, 2017 3:58 PM
> From: sven.axels...@gmail.com
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>
> Hello list.
>
> I would like to create fingering instructions for an eight hole wind 
> instrument. The usual way to display these fingerings would be to have the 
> thumb hole at the top, slightly offset, and the other seven holes in the 
> center column of the diagram.
>
> I have not really tried to do anything yet - the woodwind diagrams look 
> terribly complicated to customize. There was talk about including fingering 
> for recorders on the list some time ago, did anything come out of this? If 
> so, I could probably start there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Sven Axelsson
> ++[>++>+++>++>++
>><-]>.+..>+.>+.<<-.>>+.>.<<.
> +++.>-.<<++.>>.<++.>>>++..>>.<.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: OLL/snippets renaming (Re: Broken (?) snippets in openlilylib/snippets)

[James.Correa]

No objections here too.
Best,
James

>  Original Message 
> Subject: OLL/snippets renaming (Re: Broken (?) snippets in 
> openlilylib/snippets)
> Local Time: July 11, 2017 11:35 AM
> UTC Time: July 11, 2017 2:35 PM
> From: u...@openlilylib.org
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Hi all,
> by now I"ve fixed a number of the below issues and created a few items
> on the issue tracker for the remaining ones.
> Right now I"m wrapping things up a little bit, and part of this is an
> urge to restructure the repository somewhat. In the beginning of the
> repository there was no proper strategy for a directory structure,
> basically whenever someone didn"t immediately know where to put a new
> snippet they decided to create a new directory ;-)
> I would like to rename some directories and move some snippets. In
> particular the "notation-snippets" and the "input-shorthands" seem
> somewhat blurred to me. And, with the nicer syntax of \loadModule I
> would prefer shorter and less redundant names.
> \loadModule snippets.lyrics.align-on-vowels
> is more convenient and expressive than
> \loadModule snippets.notation-snippets.align-lyrics-on-vowels
> etc.
> The question is:
> How many people are actually using the snippets repository, and how much
> inconvenience would that be for these people. I *can* take some care
> about "deprecating" and redirecting includes, but doing this generally
> would actually make the whole thing totally convoluted. So actually I"d
> prefer a clean cut and starting over with a new and cleaner structure.
> Opinions? Objections?
> Urs
> Am 06.07.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I"m wrapping up a number of things in openLilyLib, and I came across
>> snippets where the example files don"t compile (with LilyPond 2.19.60).
>> Please go through this list and if you feel responsible for the snippet
>> please have a look:
>>
>> * notation-snippets/align-lyrics-on-vowels
>> (warning: ignored infinite X-offset)
>> * notation-snippets/alternating-time-signatures
>> (well, that"s me, I"ll keep it as a reference)
>> * notation-snippets/blackmensural-notation
>> * notation-snippets.lyric-syllable-magnetic-snap
>> * notation-snippets.metric-mod
>> * notation-snippets.scale-vertical-spacing
>> * notation-snippets/shaping-bezier-curves/slur-attachments-example.ly
>>
>> * editorial-tools/git-commands
>> (me again)
>> * input-shorthands/easy-octaves
>> * specific-solutions/xelatex-markup-list
>> * templates/predefined-instruments
>>
>> * notation-snippets.scaling-stencils
>> Is this a snippet or an example?
>>
>> * is input-shorthands/sizeContext still necessary or has this been
>> included in Lilypond in the meantime?
>>
>>
>> Maybe this isn"t all that has to be done, I also realized that this
>> repository is very inconsistent in style and quality. However, I want
>> the snippets repository to become a member of the openLilyLib package
>> family, which means that - in addition to the existing style of
>> including the "definitions.ily" files of a directory the stuff can be
>> loaded as "modules".
>>
>> Currently this relies on snippets on the "make-modules" branch and
>> oll-core on the "config" branch, but I intend to merge both in the next
>> days.
>>
>> This will result in input code like for example
>>
>> \include "oll-core/package.ily"
>> \loadPackage page-layout
>> \loadPackage \with {
>> modules = arrows.frames
>> }
>> analysis
>> \loadModule snippets.notation-snippets.compound-slurs
>> \loadModules snippets
>> #"((notation-snippets compound-slurs)
>> (input-shorthands easy-custom-dynamics))
>>
>> An overview of this mechanism can be found on
>> https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core/wiki
>>
>> Going through most of the directory structure made me realize that I
>> would really like to move and rename many modules. For example
>> "easy-custom-dynamics" should not be accessible through
>> snippets.input-shorthands.easy-custom-dynamics
>> but through
>> snippets.notation.custom-dynamics
>> Also there are many verbose directory names that should be shortened:
>> snippets.notation-snippets => snippets.notation etc.
>>
>> The problem is that such a reorganization and renaming would of course
>> break lots of existing files ...
>>
>> Best for now
>> Urs
>>
> --
> u...@openlilylib.org
> https://openlilylib.org
> http://lilypondblog.org
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: help with frameEngraver-bars-and-boxes function

[James.Correa]

Thanks David and Holland!! It is working now.
All the best,

James










 Original Message 
Subject: Re: help with frameEngraver-bars-and-boxes function
Local Time: January 9, 2017 12:48 PM
UTC Time: January 9, 2017 2:48 PM
From: david.nales...@gmail.com
To: holl...@hollandhopson.com <holl...@hollandhopson.com>
lilypond-user@gnu.org <lilypond-user@gnu.org>

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:32 AM, holl...@hollandhopson.com
<holl...@hollandhopson.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2017, at 5:39 PM, James.Correa <james.cor...@protonmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is my first time writing on the list. I have using lilypond for a few
> months, and I find in the list archive a function written by David Nalesnik
> that is exactly what I need for my score. It compiles ok on Lilypond 2.18.2,
> but I am using 2.19.53 for my score and I am getting this warnings:
> Starting lilypond 2.19.53 [frameEngraver-boxes-and-repeats-example.ly]...
> Processing
> `/Users/jamescorrea/Downloads/frameEngraver-boxes-and-repeats-example.ly'
> Parsing...
> warning: type check for `FrameStub' failed; value `#' must
> be of type `list'
> warning: type check for `FrameBracket' failed; value `#'
> must be of type `list'
> warning: type check for `FrameExtender' failed; value `#'
> must be of type `list'
> warning: type check for `Frame' failed; value `#' must be
> of type `list'
> Interpreting music...
> Exited with exit status 1.
>
> My code skills aren't enough to fix it. Can someone help me?
> I am attaching the .ily file, I hope the author will be ok with.
> Thanks in advance!!!
>
>
> Hi James,
> Here’s a tidbit I filed away the last time frameEngraver was discussed:
> "
> ...should mention that this needs 2.18.x There is a single change which you
> need for current development versions. See the last line below:
>
> % ADD NEW GROB DEFINITIONS
> %
>
> #(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry)
> (let* ((meta-entry (assoc-get 'meta grob-entry))
> (class (assoc-get 'class meta-entry))
> (ifaces-entry (assoc-get 'interfaces meta-entry)))
> (set-object-property! grob-name 'translation-type? ly:grob-properties?)
> ;; NB!!
> “
>
> I think this was Nalesnik speaking. I don’t know enough to say that this
> will fix the problem, but I hope it helps. I've used frameEngraver
> extensively, so I want to see it continue to function!
> Best,
> Holland
>

Yes, me speaking :) This should fix the problem.

David

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

help with frameEngraver-bars-and-boxes function

[James.Correa]

Hi,

This is my first time writing on the list. I have using lilypond for a few 
months, and I find in the list archive a function written by David Nalesnik 
that is exactly what I need for my score. It compiles ok on Lilypond 2.18.2, 
but I am using 2.19.53 for my score and I am getting this warnings:

Starting lilypond 2.19.53 [frameEngraver-boxes-and-repeats-example.ly]...


Processing 
`/Users/jamescorrea/Downloads/frameEngraver-boxes-and-repeats-example.ly'


Parsing...


warning: type check for `FrameStub' failed; value `#' must be 
of type `list'


warning: type check for `FrameBracket' failed; value `#' must 
be of type `list'


warning: type check for `FrameExtender' failed; value `#' must 
be of type `list'


warning: type check for `Frame' failed; value `#' must be of 
type `list'


Interpreting music...


Exited with exit status 1.


My code skills aren't enough to fix it. Can someone help me?
I am attaching the .ily file, I hope the author will be ok with.
Thanks in advance!!!

frameEngraver-bars-and-boxes.ily
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user