Re: A big advantage to lilypond
Hi Abraham, Now you’re talking. I knew I was missing on out something… Thanks. -d > On Mar 21, 2016, at 6:00 PM, Abraham Lee <tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Check out: www.mutopiaproject.org <http://www.mutopiaproject.org/> > > Best, > Abraham > > On Monday, March 21, 2016, Redwood (Daniel) <redwood5...@icloud.com > <mailto:redwood5...@icloud.com>> wrote: > Maybe, but then putting them on IMSLP? > > I suppose. > > -d > > On Mar 21, 2016, at 5:54 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > "Redwood (Daniel)" <redwood5...@icloud.com <javascript:;>> writes: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I’m converting from Sibelius. Not a simple, quick project. I have > >> probably more than a hundred scores in Sibelius. So I’m looking for > >> reasons to do this, aside from the difficulty of their licensing > >> scheme. > >> > >> One thing I love about lilypond: when I find a file on IMSLP with the > >> source. Then I can make my own modifications. > >> > >> But I wonder: why aren’t more lilypond authors posting more of their > >> sources to IMSLP? > > > > I consider it likely that quite a number of sources for personal use are > > derived from proprietary material still under copyright. So they may > > not be distributed. > > > > -- > > David Kastrup > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org <javascript:;> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user> ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: A big advantage to lilypond
Maybe, but then putting them on IMSLP? I suppose. -d > On Mar 21, 2016, at 5:54 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > "Redwood (Daniel)" <redwood5...@icloud.com> writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> I’m converting from Sibelius. Not a simple, quick project. I have >> probably more than a hundred scores in Sibelius. So I’m looking for >> reasons to do this, aside from the difficulty of their licensing >> scheme. >> >> One thing I love about lilypond: when I find a file on IMSLP with the >> source. Then I can make my own modifications. >> >> But I wonder: why aren’t more lilypond authors posting more of their >> sources to IMSLP? > > I consider it likely that quite a number of sources for personal use are > derived from proprietary material still under copyright. So they may > not be distributed. > > -- > David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
A big advantage to lilypond
Hi all, I’m converting from Sibelius. Not a simple, quick project. I have probably more than a hundred scores in Sibelius. So I’m looking for reasons to do this, aside from the difficulty of their licensing scheme. One thing I love about lilypond: when I find a file on IMSLP with the source. Then I can make my own modifications. But I wonder: why aren’t more lilypond authors posting more of their sources to IMSLP? And is there some way to find the lilypond source files — the pieces that have lilypond sources. I found some through their postings on a French site (can’t think of the name now), but it’s on about a dozen pieces, none of which interest me. Music I’m going to perform, I usually typeset anyway, partly as a way to learn the music. But much of what I play is for my enjoyment, and I don’t rescore it. Also, much music like Beethoven sonatas are a great deal of trouble to score/typeset. This is not really a question, but more a note to say that I get how important this is for sharing music. Sibelius scores could also be shared, but it’s kind of rude to ask someone to pay for it. I’m using Frescobaldi now as a front-end. It has a number of useful features. I also tried plugs in for vim and Atom, but was frustrated with those. -d ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Initial grace notes
Thanks, Yes, I got this from others as well. Perhaps I need to cc the group so I won’t get an individual response from every user? -d > On Mar 19, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek <carsonm...@ca.rr.com> wrote: > > Daniel: > > In the Guitar2, insert at the beginning of the first measure: > \grace s4 > > Mark > > -Original Message- > From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org > [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org] On Behalf Of > Redwood (Daniel) > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 12:15 PM > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Initial grace notes > > Attached are 3 files to recreate the problem. > > lilypond bug.ly generates lilypond.pdf along with some error messages. > > The problem seems to only occur when > > 1) I generate a score > 2) The first notes in one part are 2 grace notes. > > If I generate the part with the grace notes on its own, no problem. > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Initial grace notes
Hi Thomas Morley,
Perfect!
bug2.ly now has:
\grace {s8 s8} R2. |
Now I get harmless warnings, but I wonder if there’s anything I should do about
them?
Interpreting music...
MIDI output to `bug.midi'...
programming error: Going back in MIDI time.
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: Going back in MIDI time.
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: Going back in MIDI time.
continuing, cross fingers
This on 3 bars of music, which look nice now:
I’m switching from Sibelius which I’ve used for about 15 years. Every single
time I had to do anything with licensing, I needed support, and this time, even
after support, I could purchase the product, though I was willing to pay. Funny
thing is, years ago, I was the sole developer of flexLM, which is what they use
for licensing, at least in part. Payback I suppose.
-d
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2016-03-18 20:14 GMT+01:00 Redwood (Daniel) <redwood5...@icloud.com>:
>> Attached are 3 files to recreate the problem.
>>
>> lilypond bug.ly generates lilypond.pdf along with some error messages.
>>
>> The problem seems to only occur when
>>
>> 1) I generate a score
>> 2) The first notes in one part are 2 grace notes.
>>
>> If I generate the part with the grace notes on its own, no problem.
>
> It's issue 34
> Workaround in the NR
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns#grace-notes
> scroll down to "Known issues and warnings"
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
