Re: Markup command trouble
Hi David, On 25/07/2022 16:35, David Kastrup wrote: You probably meant \markup spanish = \markup \italic \etc which defines a markup command. The way you wrote it, \spanish is just a scheme function that happens to return the internals of a markup command definition. I did mean that. Strange that I didn’t remember that from when you introduced the \etc syntax—it is properly documented. Thanks for helping out and all the best! Simon
Re: Markup command trouble
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Dear list,
>
> I wanted to define a markup command for easy switchable styling of
> text and ran into an issue which seems hard to understand:
>
>
> \version "2.23.9"
>
> spanish = \markup\italic \etc
>
> \markup \column {
> \spanish \justify { test }
> }
>
>
> => “error: not a markup”
>
> My understanding would have been that \justify returns a list of
> markups and the \spanish command, as if I had just used \italic
> directly, should act on all elements of that list. What did I get
> wrong? Is it just me or should that be made more predictable, if
> possible?
You probably meant
\markup spanish = \markup \italic \etc
which defines a markup command. The way you wrote it, \spanish is just
a scheme function that happens to return the internals of a markup
command definition.
--
David Kastrup
Markup command trouble
Dear list,
I wanted to define a markup command for easy switchable styling of text
and ran into an issue which seems hard to understand:
\version "2.23.9"
spanish = \markup\italic \etc
\markup \column {
\spanish \justify { test }
}
=> “error: not a markup”
My understanding would have been that \justify returns a list of markups
and the \spanish command, as if I had just used \italic directly, should
act on all elements of that list. What did I get wrong? Is it just me or
should that be made more predictable, if possible?
Best, Simon
