Re: Regarding laissez vibrers

[David Kastrup]

Robert Murdoch  writes:

> There is currently a bug in LilyPond where repeat ties appended to a
> single note in a chord don't appear, hence why I wrote my message in
> the first place.

That was issue 5220, will be fixed come 2.21.0 and is already so in
current master.

-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Regarding laissez vibrers

[Robert Murdoch]

There is currently a bug in LilyPond where repeat ties appended to a 
single note in a chord don't appear, hence why I wrote my message in the 
first place.



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

RE: Regarding laissez vibrers

[Mark Stephen Mrotek]

Robert,

 

Perhaps the use of a “repeat tie?”

 

http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/writing-rhythms#ties

 

Mark

 

From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] 
On Behalf Of Robert Murdoch
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:08 AM
To: lilypond-user 
Subject: Regarding laissez vibrers

 

Hi, looking at this post 
 , the 
(currently) broken repeatTie on single notes in a chord can be faked with 
\override LaissezVibrerTie.head-direction = #RIGHT <{note}\laissez Vibrer 
{note}\laissezVibrer>. Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to get two or more 
laissez vibrers facing different directions on the same chord. The log says 
that laissez vibrers in the same chord should all face the same direction, so 
is there another way?

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user