Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
- Original Message - From: Julien Rioux jri...@lyx.org To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 9:43 PM Subject: Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1 On 04/01/2013 4:30 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: Thanks for testing this. 2.16.2 is currently uploading and the stable build (which you have actually already downloaded from my website) should be on lilypond.org tomorrow. -- Phil Holmes Thanks for tackling this, Phil, and thanks to those who ran tests. BTW, should the backported patches be marked fixed_2_16_2 on the issue tracker, as David did for 2_16_x before? Done. -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
On 01/04/2013 06:00 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from being run on 2.16.1. Before uploading this to the official website, I would appreciate it if interested and capable users could download it from my own website: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/lilypond-2.16.2-1.mingw.exe and test the lilypond-book functionality. Please reply-all with your results. I would appreciate it if those interested in a fix could do this as soon as possible. Works like a charm on Win7 professional. Note that my last previous install was 2.16.0 which also worked well, so I haven't tested an update from 2.16.1. /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote: I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from being run on 2.16.1. Before uploading this to the official website, I would appreciate it if interested and capable users could download it from my own website: http://philholmes.net/**lilypond/lilypond-2.16.2-1.**mingw.exehttp://philholmes.net/lilypond/lilypond-2.16.2-1.mingw.exe and test the lilypond-book functionality. Please reply-all with your results. I would appreciate it if those interested in a fix could do this as soon as possible. Dear Phil, I tested on Win7 x64, uninstalled LilyPond 2.16.1 and installed LilyPond 2.16.2. LilyPond works, as does lilypond-book.py now. No longer do I need to run python on the .py file as I reported earlier with LilyPond 2.16.1. I already updated my makefile to reflect the fix in LilyPond 2.16.2. Best regards and many thanks! Olivier ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
Thanks for testing this. 2.16.2 is currently uploading and the stable build (which you have actually already downloaded from my website) should be on lilypond.org tomorrow. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Olivier Biot To: Phil Holmes Cc: Chris ; Per Sennels ; LilyPond User Group Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 9:23 PM Subject: Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1 On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote: I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from being run on 2.16.1. Before uploading this to the official website, I would appreciate it if interested and capable users could download it from my own website: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/lilypond-2.16.2-1.mingw.exe and test the lilypond-book functionality. Please reply-all with your results. I would appreciate it if those interested in a fix could do this as soon as possible. Dear Phil, I tested on Win7 x64, uninstalled LilyPond 2.16.1 and installed LilyPond 2.16.2. LilyPond works, as does lilypond-book.py now. No longer do I need to run python on the .py file as I reported earlier with LilyPond 2.16.1. I already updated my makefile to reflect the fix in LilyPond 2.16.2. Best regards and many thanks! Olivier -- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
On 04/01/2013 4:30 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: Thanks for testing this. 2.16.2 is currently uploading and the stable build (which you have actually already downloaded from my website) should be on lilypond.org tomorrow. -- Phil Holmes Thanks for tackling this, Phil, and thanks to those who ran tests. BTW, should the backported patches be marked fixed_2_16_2 on the issue tracker, as David did for 2_16_x before? -- Julien ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
Hi Phil et al, downloaded, installed and tested, with both normal lilypond and lilypond-book, without any problems. Thanks for fixing this problem so quickly, Best Per Sennels 2013/1/4 Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from being run on 2.16.1. Before uploading this to the official website, I would appreciate it if interested and capable users could download it from my own website: http://philholmes.net/**lilypond/lilypond-2.16.2-1.**mingw.exehttp://philholmes.net/lilypond/lilypond-2.16.2-1.mingw.exe and test the lilypond-book functionality. Please reply-all with your results. I would appreciate it if those interested in a fix could do this as soon as possible. Thanks. -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
Julien Rioux jri...@lyx.org writes: On 04/01/2013 4:30 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: Thanks for testing this. 2.16.2 is currently uploading and the stable build (which you have actually already downloaded from my website) should be on lilypond.org tomorrow. -- Phil Holmes Thanks for tackling this, Phil, and thanks to those who ran tests. BTW, should the backported patches be marked fixed_2_16_2 on the issue tracker, as David did for 2_16_x before? I should think so. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
