Re: What's the best way to fix these beams and staff spacing?
Adding the additional space via markup worked. Is this an issue I should create a bug tracker for? -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/What-s-the-best-way-to-fix-these-beams-and-staff-spacing-tp153566p153678.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: What's the best way to fix these beams and staff spacing?
Michael Rivers michaeljrivers at gmail.com writes: Adding the additional space via markup worked. Is this an issue I should create a bug tracker for? There is a close one http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1702 LilyPond's strategy, spacing the staves and then deciding how to set the beams, does a good job on the examples there if you remove the forced stem directions. The strategy does not work so well when the beam is forced between staves. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: What's the best way to fix these beams and staff spacing?
On 11/09/2013 09:24 AM, Michael Rivers wrote: Here is the 28th bar of an etude by Rachmaninoff: What would be the best way of fixing this output? The space between the staves is fine for all but this system and one other with the same problem. Could you post the same bar from an edition of the score? Best Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: What's the best way to fix these beams and staff spacing?
Thanks for the reply. My scanner's broken, but there are two scans of the Rachmaninoff prelude at IMSLP: http://imslp.org/wiki/Etudes-tableaux,_Op.33_%28Rachmaninoff,_Sergei%29 The first edition at IMSLP lists the G minor prelude as the 8th prelude; the second one lists it as the 7th prelude. In the second edition (which is a little better), it's the 7th etude, 3rd page, 3rd system. It's pretty clear what's wrong with the Lilypond output: the beams cross right over the note heads. http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n153592/Rachmaninoff_Prelude_Op._33_No._7_clip.png -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/What-s-the-best-way-to-fix-these-beams-and-staff-spacing-tp153566p153592.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: What's the best way to fix these beams and staff spacing?
Mr. Rivers,
Attached is my solution. Might not be the best, yet may give some ideas.
Mark
\version 2.16.2
global = {
\key bes \major
\time 4/4
}
right = \relative c'' {
\global
r32 aes, c fis c'8
\change Staff = left
\stemUp
d,,32 [ ees f g ]
\change Staff = right
\stemNeutral
c ees g, ees
\change Staff = left
\stemUp
bes [ ees bes' g ]
\change Staff = right
c g' ees g,
\change Staff = left
aes, [ c f ees ]
g c ees, c |
}
left = \relative c' {
\global
ees,8 fis32 g b c
\stemDown
d,8 c bes4 aes8 g |
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff = right \right
\new Staff = left { \clef bass \left }
\layout { }
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: What's the best way to fix these beams and staff spacing?
Thanks for the solutions. Mark -- that's the kind of solution I used the last time this came up in a score, but this time I'd like to show which hand Rachmaninoff wants the notes played with. Keith -- I do have a dynamic context, so I'll try putting in some blank space that way. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/What-s-the-best-way-to-fix-these-beams-and-staff-spacing-tp153566p153609.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
