Re: rest + fermata
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019, Malte Meyn wrote: r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed. Is this a bug? That’s the third time in a few weeks that someone asks why that doesn’t work at a list/forum/… that I read. Looks like I should continue my work on issue 5486 (https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5486/) and maybe find a way that \fermataMarkup isn’t needed anymore and R1\fermata works instead … Everyone thanks for the easy solution. Easy but ugly. Would be nice if R1\fermata would simply work. No big deal though, no need to hurry to make this possible, MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
Am 14.04.19 um 13:38 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen: Hi, This is strange: %%% start of tiny example \version "2.19.83" { r1\fermata R1\fermata } %%% end of tiny example r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed. Is this a bug? That’s the third time in a few weeks that someone asks why that doesn’t work at a list/forum/… that I read. Looks like I should continue my work on issue 5486 (https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5486/) and maybe find a way that \fermataMarkup isn’t needed anymore and R1\fermata works instead … ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
Hi Martin, Three identical answers - that's fascinating, It must be due to global distribution delays on the list. cheerio! Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
- Original Message - From: "Martin Tarenskeen" To: "lilypond-user mailinglist" ; "bug-lilypond mailinglist" Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 12:38 PM Subject: rest + fermata Hi, This is strange: %%% start of tiny example \version "2.19.83" { r1\fermata R1\fermata } %%% end of tiny example r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed. Is this a bug? -- MT See http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes \fermataMarkup -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
Am So., 14. Apr. 2019 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb Martin Tarenskeen : > > > Hi, > > This is strange: > > %%% start of tiny example > > \version "2.19.83" > { >r1\fermata >R1\fermata > } > > %%% end of tiny example > > r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed. > Is this a bug? Hi, see http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/writing-rests#index-_005cfermataMarkup-1 leading to: { r1\fermata R1\fermataMarkup } No bug ;) Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
Hi Martin, R1^\fermataMarkup It's special. Refer to the NR. Andrew On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 21:38, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > Hi, > > This is strange: > > %%% start of tiny example > > \version "2.19.83" > { >r1\fermata >R1\fermata > } > > %%% end of tiny example > > r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed. > Is this a bug? > > -- > > MT > > ___ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilyp...@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user