Re: Stem-to-stem slurs

2015-10-08 Thread Mats Bengtsson 
Simon Albrecht  mail.de> writes:

> >> Other than adding \shape overrides
> > Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?
> 
> Because they have to be done for each slur individually?
> At any rate, it would be easier to, say, \override Slur.attachment = 
> #'Stem (as opposed to #'NoteHead).

If you search the mailing list archives, you will find out that LilyPond had
such a feature up to version 2.2, when it was removed as part of a
reimplementation of the slur support. Apart from the technical difficulty of
supporting it with the new implementation, another reason was the intention
that LilyPond should "do the right thing" in a sufficiently large portion of
all cases that the feature was no longer needed. 

/Mats


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Stem-to-stem slurs

2015-10-07 Thread Simon Albrecht 

On 07.10.2015 14:50, Kieren MacMillan wrote:

Hi Javier,


Other than adding \shape overrides

Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?


Because they have to be done for each slur individually?
At any rate, it would be easier to, say, \override Slur.attachment = 
#'Stem (as opposed to #'NoteHead).

Just brainstorming.

Yours, Simon

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Stem-to-stem slurs

2015-10-07 Thread Javier Ruiz-Alma 

| My apologies. On further research, the feature to anchor slurs to stems 
existed way before I knew of LilyPond, just no longer available.I'm sure I 
searched for this for an earlier 
project:http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-08/msg00177.html



 |

 On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 2:04 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
   
 

 On 07.10.2015 14:50, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
>> Other than adding \shape overrides
> Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?

Because they have to be done for each slur individually?
At any rate, it would be easier to, say, \override Slur.attachment = 
#'Stem (as opposed to #'NoteHead).
Just brainstorming.

Yours, Simon


 
   ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Stem-to-stem slurs

2015-10-07 Thread David Nalesnik 
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma 
wrote:

> Other than adding \shape overrides, is there a way to tell LP to anchor
> the slurs to the stems instead of noteheads?
>
>
>
> %%---Begin snippet
>
> \version “2.18.2”
>
> <<{ \clef bass 2  }\\{ f'4( e') d'( c') }>>
>

Try:

<<{
  \clef bass 2  }
  \\
  { f'4-\tweak positions #'(0.5 . 0) ( e') d'-\tweak positions #'(0 .
-0.5)( c')
}>>

Adjust numbers to your liking.

David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Stem-to-stem slurs

2015-10-07 Thread Kieren MacMillan 
Hi Javier,

> Other than adding \shape overrides

Why do you want to avoid \shape overrides?

Cheers,
Kieren.


Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Stem-to-stem slurs

2015-10-06 Thread Javier Ruiz-Alma 
Other than adding \shape overrides, is there a way to tell LP to anchor the
slurs to the stems instead of noteheads?

 

%%---Begin snippet

\version "2.18.2"

<<{ \clef bass 2  }\\{ f'4( e') d'( c') }>>

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user