FW: Whole measure rests in Compound duple meter

2014-12-10 Thread Do something Artistic
Can't figure out why sometimes these don't go through

 
From: vegasart...@hotmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Whole measure rests in Compound duple meter
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:46:14 -0800




Trying to figure out the notation for whole measure rests in 6/8 time. My work 
around right now is r2. which seems to fill up the measure but I find this 
aesthetically unpleasant. Is there another way.
 
Thank you,
 
Spencer 

  ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: FW: Whole measure rests in Compound duple meter

2014-12-10 Thread Urs Liska


Am 10.12.2014 22:54, schrieb Do something Artistic:

Can't figure out why sometimes these don't go through



From: vegasart...@hotmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Whole measure rests in Compound duple meter
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:46:14 -0800

Trying to figure out the notation for whole measure rests in 6/8 time. 
My work around right now is r2. which seems to fill up the measure but 
I find this aesthetically unpleasant. Is there another way.


You mean R2.
?



Thank you,

Spencer


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Whole measure rests in Compound duple meter

2014-12-10 Thread Cynthia Karl

 On Dec 10, 2014, at 5:02 PM, vegasart...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
 Message: 4
 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:54:28 -0800
 From: Do something Artistic vegasart...@hotmail.com
 To: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org
 Subject: FW: Whole measure rests in Compound duple meter
 
 Can't figure out why sometimes these don't go through
 
 
 From: vegasart...@hotmail.com
 To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
 Subject: Whole measure rests in Compound duple meter
 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:46:14 -0800
 
 
 
 
 Trying to figure out the notation for whole measure rests in 6/8 time. My 
 work around right now is r2. which seems to fill up the measure but I find 
 this aesthetically unpleasant. Is there another way.

I think the following is succinct and correct:

* the notation for a whole measure rest in a time signature of m/n, 
e.g., 6/8 or 5/4 or even 4/4,is:  R1*m/n
   (the fraction m/n can be reduced to lowest terms, and if the result 
is 1, it can be eliminated.)

* for a sequence of k whole measure rests in a row, the notation is:  
R1*m/n*k

Examples:   *  a whole measure rest in \time 6/8 is R1*6/8, or, 
equivalently, R1*3/4
*  a sequence of 3 whole rests in \time 6/8 is R1*6/8*3



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user