Re: autobeaming over rests,Re: autobeaming over rests,Re: autobeaming over rests,Re: autobeaming over rests
>> Veeery nice, thanks! I only wonder what situation you envision to
>> add a special property for skips...
>
> \version "2.24.0"
>
> \new Staff \relative
> <<
> { c'8[ s s c] }
> \\
> { s c c s }
>>>
>
> doesn't seem unreasonable to me (for example in piano music).
OK, thanks.
Werner
Re: autobeaming over rests, Re: autobeaming over rests, Re: autobeaming over rests,Re: autobeaming over rests
Hi Werner,
Am 29.01.23 um 11:30 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
IMHO, there are definitely valid situations where
automatic beaming over rests does make sense.
this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit:
[...]
Veeery nice, thanks! I only wonder what situation you envision to add
a special property for skips...
\version "2.24.0"
\new Staff \relative
<<
{ c'8[ s s c] }
\\
{ s c c s }
>>
doesn't seem unreasonable to me (for example in piano music).
Lukas
Re: autobeaming over rests,Re: autobeaming over rests,Re: autobeaming over rests,Re: autobeaming over rests
> > IMHO, there are definitely valid situations where > > automatic beaming over rests does make sense. > > this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit: > [...] Veeery nice, thanks! I only wonder what situation you envision to add a special property for skips... Werner
