Am 23.04.2017 um 22:23 schrieb Michael Käppler:
Hi Karol,
it depends on which rhythmical structure you want to express.
If you intend a base structure in 8ths where the 4th note is not
stressed, I would prefer (2).
If you want to achieve a base structure in dotted 8ths, like a 12/16
signature divided in four beats, I would write (1).
12/16 is a distinct time signature (favoured e.g. by Bach), however a
proper 6/8 time may also feature situations where 16 16 16 8. grouping
makes more sense. It really is a matter of style/rhythmic feel. (Though
many engravers would be stricter than I about per-beat grouping.)
Best, Simon
HTH,
Michael
Am 23.04.2017 um 21:52 schrieb Karol Majewski:
Hi, which grouping is better:
6/8: c16 c16 c16 c8.~ c4.
or
6/8: c16 c16 c6 c16~ c8~ c4.
Couldn't find the answer in "Behind Bars".
-Best
KM
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
