Re: latest source (was Re: id's for svg elements)
Bric writes: > On 10/27/2013 03:07 AM, Mike Solomon wrote: >> (PS: how is it that you have 2.17.30, when the latest version is >> 2.17.29 ? http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/source/v2.17/ ) >> >> >> I build LilyPond from source, and the current version in current >> master is 2.17.30. > > uuuh... so did /I/, from 2.17.29. But the above link to source tar > balls is the most recent source I see. There's no 2.17.30 there. > > When I go to the development and unstable source page, I still only > see 2.17.29 as the latest: > http://lilypond.org/development.html > > When I google — [ lilypond "2.17.30" ] — I get links external to > lilypond.org, and just documentations and forums. If you build from source tarballs, the step to building from a checkout of the development repository is actually minor. Developer releases occur in a 2-week pattern usually, without any particular relation to code quality (apart from the development process needing to compile for a number of different platforms and older compiler versions, so it can be delayed by requiring some urgent fixes). It depends on how much you are tracking current changes and developments whether closing this 2-week gap is important to you. If you find that a number of bug fixes or developments occur in response or cooperation with your reports of current problems, cutting short that 2-week feedback cycle might come handy. And a checked out repository makes it quite easier to contribute patches if you find you can improve on LilyPond or its documentation. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: latest source (was Re: id's for svg elements)
What you're seeing is the latest _released_ source tarball. They are referring to the latest state of the development Git repository at savannah.org Bric schrieb: >On 10/27/2013 03:07 AM, Mike Solomon wrote: >> (PS: how is it that you have 2.17.30, when the latest version is >2.17.29 ? http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/source/v2.17/ ) >> >> >> I build LilyPond from source, and the current version in current >master is 2.17.30. > >uuuh... so did /I/, from 2.17.29. But the above link to source tar >balls is the most recent source I see. There's no 2.17.30 there. > >When I go to the development and unstable source page, I still only see > >2.17.29 as the latest: >http://lilypond.org/development.html > >When I google — [ lilypond "2.17.30" ] — I get links external to >lilypond.org, and just documentations and forums. > > > >___ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
latest source (was Re: id's for svg elements)
On 10/27/2013 03:07 AM, Mike Solomon wrote: (PS: how is it that you have 2.17.30, when the latest version is 2.17.29 ? http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/source/v2.17/ ) I build LilyPond from source, and the current version in current master is 2.17.30. uuuh... so did /I/, from 2.17.29. But the above link to source tar balls is the most recent source I see. There's no 2.17.30 there. When I go to the development and unstable source page, I still only see 2.17.29 as the latest: http://lilypond.org/development.html When I google — [ lilypond "2.17.30" ] — I get links external to lilypond.org, and just documentations and forums. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
