Re: Dynamics over-lapping with bar-lines
Greetings David, Following the problem I was having with dynamics in a flute part and a piano part not lining up, on the advice of the list I upgraded my LilyPond from v2.14.2 to 2.18.0. Problem of non-alignment solved. But I still find that dynamics often contact or even cross a bar-line. In the flute part of this piece it does not matter, of course, because the bar-line does not extend beyond the stave. But in the piano part it does matter. The problem is the same whether the dynamic marks are added in a Staff context or in a separate Dynamics context. How do I tell LilyPond not to superimpose dynamics and bar-lines? David Now that you have successfully upgraded to LilyPond 2.18.0, the command which I earlier gave you should work - namely, \override Staff.DynamicText.self-alignment-X = #-1 If your dynamics are in a Dynamics context rather than a Staff context, then change Staff in the above command to Dynamics. The default horizontal position for DynamicText is #0, or centered. #1 right-aligns the dynamics; #-1 left-aligns them. Other numbers, whether between or outside of these bounds, will work as well. I hope this helps. Please take care. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how close are we to having an addAt or insertAt feature?
Found another worthwhile optimization making a difference (basically, not discarding and regenerating a blob that is going to get analyzed next anyway). In your use case where almost all changes happen in the same large file, this does make a bit of a difference, in particular regarding the system time (probably mostly expended on file reads). dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/wortliste$ time ../git/git blame wortliste /dev/null real 4m18.314s user 2m59.460s sys 1m16.784s Impressive! Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Define custom/new \accidentalStyles (dodecaphonic minus repeated notes)
Hi,
searching the docs and the lilypond-user archive I couldn't find any
relevant information.
I am looking for a custom \accidentalStyle. Actually I think this is
quite commonly used, so it would also seem like a useful addition to
LilyPond proper.
a)
Every note gets an explicit accidental (including a natural),
as in the 'dodecaphonic style,
_except_ when a note is repeated immediately in the same voice.
That is:
{ c fis c c fis } should be printed as in the attached image, like
{ c! fis! c! c fis! } (note the missing ! after the last c
The only reference to a similar (same?) request I found was this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-02/msg00667.
###
When looking into music-functions.scm and its set-accidental-style I see
((equal? style 'dodecaphonic)
(set-accidentals-properties #f
`(Staff ,(lambda (c p bn mp) '(#f . #t)))
'()
context))
So it seems the way to go to make a copy of that definition (e.g. with
comparing against 'dodecaphonic-no-repeat) and modifying the definition.
Unfortunately I don't have a clue how to proceed. Any trials are simply
anwered by errors, so I'd prefer not to _try_ but to do at least
_informed guesses_ ;-)
I assume that the
`(Staff
expression returns the
context pitch barnumber measureposition
arguments for
set-accidental-properties
so this seems the place to define the right arguments.
Unfortunately I haven't _fully_ understood lambda expressions and
_barely_ understood quoting and unquoting.
So I'd be glad about hints/explanations/solutions to
a)
create a differing but valid argument list at all and
b)
determining which '(#f . #t) combinations to use for my purpose.
TIA
Urs
attachment: document.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Layout issue when parsing line
2014-02-01, Antara-Prabhat antara-prab...@antara-prabhat.com: Just a nitpick, it's not related to your question, but \version 2.18.0-1 is that a valid number in a version statement? 2.18.0-1 is certainly what the download link text states and it may be a package version in a distribution repository, but does the convert-ly tool manage that properly? I don't know. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tempo placement
[CC'ing to -devel]
Am 03.02.2014 00:44, schrieb Eluze:
Marc Hohl wrote
Hi list,
I want the tempo indication to appear at the leftmost edge of the piece
(I know that Gould has a different opinion about this, but I am using
LilyJAZZ, and the Realbook style does not care about these typographic
conventions).
However, changing the break-align-symbols property does not seem to
have *any* effect:
\version 2.19.0
melLeftEdge = {
\override Score.MetronomeMark.break-align-symbols = #'(left-edge)
\tempo Slowly 4 = 60
c'4
}
\score { \new Staff { \melLeftEdge } }
melClef = {
\override Score.MetronomeMark.break-align-symbols = #'(clef)
\tempo Slowly 4 = 60
c'4
}
\score { \new Staff { \melClef } }
melKey = {
\override Score.MetronomeMark.break-align-symbols = #'(key-signature)
\tempo Slowly 4 = 60
c'4
}
\score { \new Staff { \melKey } }
How can I achieve a left-aligned tempo indication?
that sounds like a sophisticated problem!
instead of MetronomeMark try
\override Score.RehearsalMark.break-align-symbols = #'(left-edge)
But the tempo indication is created by the MetronomeMark engraver, so
I'll have to wrap my tempo indication into a \mark construct ... that's
probably one way to go, but it's rather clumsy.
But why does LilyPond seem to ignore '(left-edge)? Is this a bug?
then, quoting the NR:
Using the break-alignable-interface
Rehearsal marks and bar numbers may be aligned with notation objects other
than bar
lines.
... or is it just that the MetronomeMark interface does not support all
options?
These objects include ambitus, breathing-sign, clef, custos,
staff-bar, left-edge,
key-cancellation, key-signature, and time-signature.
Each type of object has its own default reference point, to which rehearsal
marks are aligned
you'll have to determine the reference point you like.
hth - a bit
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Tempo-placement-tp158722p158761.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
accessing the text stencil of a TextSpanner
It is possible to access/reshape a Metronome Mark like this: \override MetronomeMark #'stencil = #(lambda (grob) (ly:stencil-scale (lyric-text::print grob) 0.78 1)) (which will squeeze the font to a width of 0.78 (which surprisingly matches the font of the printed model very well). Now I need to make TextSpanners identical to the MetronomeMark, so I would need to apply the same scaling to TextSpanner.bound-details.left.text but I have no idea how to achieve that. \once \override TextSpanner.bound-details.stencil = #(lambda (grob) (ly:stencil-scale (lyric-text::print grob) 0.78 1)) doesn't have any effect. Any help? Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tempo placement
Marc Hohl wrote: But why does LilyPond seem to ignore '(left-edge)? It seems it is not visible. The first left edge doesn't arise via a line break, so for pedantic Lilypond the _unbroken_ case applies. Try \once \override Score.LeftEdge.break-visibility = #all-visible Cheers, Robin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: accessing the text stencil of a TextSpanner
Am 03.02.2014 10:43, schrieb Urs Liska: It is possible to access/reshape a Metronome Mark like this: \override MetronomeMark #'stencil = #(lambda (grob) (ly:stencil-scale (lyric-text::print grob) 0.78 1)) (which will squeeze the font to a width of 0.78 (which surprisingly matches the font of the printed model very well). Now I need to make TextSpanners identical to the MetronomeMark, so I would need to apply the same scaling to TextSpanner.bound-details.left.text but I have no idea how to achieve that. \once \override TextSpanner.bound-details.stencil = #(lambda (grob) (ly:stencil-scale (lyric-text::print grob) 0.78 1)) doesn't have any effect. Any help? Urs Hm, I found a partial solution myself: \once \override TextSpanner.stencil = #(lambda (grob) (ly:stencil-scale (ly:line-spanner::print grob) 0.78 1)) seems to do what I want with the bound-details.left text. However, when I have used \once \override TextSpanner.bound-details.left-broken.text = to suppress the spanner text after line breaks, I get programming error: Improbable offset for stencil: -inf staff space Setting to zero. (with 2.18 as well as with 2.19) This is probably due to the fact that there isn't any stencil anymore to scale? The output is correct, but I would like to get rid of the error message. Any ideas? Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tempo placement
Marc Hohl wrote
melLeftEdge = {
\override Score.MetronomeMark.break-align-symbols = #'(left-edge)
\tempo Slowly 4 = 60
c'4
}
sometimes we're searching for too complicated things... it seems that adding
\override Score.MetronomeMark.self-alignment-X =#1
is a simple solution
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Tempo-placement-tp158722p158779.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
markup? and number?
Dear LilyPond users, I am trying to make a markup function that will take a list as an argument. Some of the members of the list will be treated as markup and some will be treated as numbers. Is there a way to convert one type to the other? Or am I going about this all the wrong way (I have no idea what I'm doing). Thank you in advance Kevin Barry ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tempo placement
Am 03.02.2014 10:45, schrieb Robin Bannister:
Marc Hohl wrote:
But why does LilyPond seem to ignore '(left-edge)?
It seems it is not visible.
The first left edge doesn't arise via a line break,
so for pedantic Lilypond the _unbroken_ case applies.
Try
\once \override Score.LeftEdge.break-visibility = #all-visible
Thanks, sounds plausible, but it doesn't work either:
\version 2.19.0
melLeftEdge = {
\override Score.LeftEdge.break-visibility = #all-visible
\override Score.RehearsalMark.break-align-symbols = #'(left-edge)
\tempo Slowly 4 = 60
c'4
}
\score {
\new Staff { \melLeftEdge }
}
still looks unchanged :-(
Marc
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: markup? and number?
Am 03.02.2014 11:47, schrieb Kevin Patrick Barry: Dear LilyPond users, I am trying to make a markup function that will take a list as an argument. Some of the members of the list will be treated as markup and some will be treated as numbers. Is there a way to convert one type to the other? Or am I going about this all the wrong way (I have no idea what I'm doing). Can you please post what you have achieved so far? It's hard to guess without seeing your code. Marc Thank you in advance Kevin Barry ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tempo placement
Marc Hohl wrote: Try \once \override Score.LeftEdge.break-visibility = #all-visible Thanks, sounds plausible, but it doesn't work either: Umm ... and with MetronomeMark ? Cheers, Robin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Harp-Symbols in LilyPond
Hi All
To add some harp-symbols I have defined some lines like this:
ziehenI = \markup { \finger \circle \override #'(font-size . 1) 1 }
ziehenII = \markup { \finger \circle \override #'(font-size . 1) 2 }
ziehenIII = \markup { \finger \circle \override #'(font-size . 1) 3 }
...
blasenI = \markup { \finger \override #'(font-size . 1) 1 }
blasenII = \markup { \finger \override #'(font-size . 1) 2 }
blasenIII = \markup { \finger \override #'(font-size . 1) 3 }
Now I can use them like
c4^\blasenI d4^\ziehenI
But this lets twist the symbols in the hight.
An other idea is to use the symbols like lyrics:
Oben = \lyricmode {
\blasenI \ziehenI
}
This works fine, all symbols are shown in one line.
But this does not work if the notation containes parenthis like
c4( d4)
Then only one symbol is shown obove.
Here is a complete example:
https://alpha.lpp-pfullingen.de/~WEICHERT/LilyPond/Example1/
May be someone has a better idea or there is a function for ignoring the
parenthis in
\lyricmode {}?
At the moment I have workaround this as:
\ziehenV \blasenIII \blasenIII
\markup { \finger \circle \override #'(font-size . 1) 3
\finger \circle \override #'(font-size . 1) 4
}
Regards, Frank
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Harp-Symbols in LilyPond
- Original Message -
From: frank.weich...@lpp-pfullingen.de
To: LILYPOND-USER@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 3:39 PM
Subject: Harp-Symbols in LilyPond
Hi All
To add some harp-symbols I have defined some lines like this:
An other idea is to use the symbols like lyrics:
Oben = \lyricmode {
\blasenI \ziehenI
}
This works fine, all symbols are shown in one line.
But this does not work if the notation containes parenthis like
c4( d4)
Then only one symbol is shown obove.
If you wish to use lyrics for harp symbols in this way, you can prevent
slurs ( ) from affecting the lyrics by using:
\set melismaBusyProperties = #'()
Alternatively, you could experiment with putting your harp symbols in a
dynamics context?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
New try with lyric extender
Hello all :) I wanted to try again to find a solution to adapt the length of a lyric extender in order to take into account all voices in a SATB hymn, as I described sometimes ago in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-11/msg00810.html and following messages. So I read some sections of the learning manual (about modifying properties and tweaking, which I still don't fully understand). Using the notation manual and internals reference, I found that lyric extenders are object of the kind Lyrics.LyricExtender . Am I correct till there ? Then, I have the following questions : -Is there a way to display (to console for example) the value of a given property ? I tried with #(Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length) or \display Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length but I don't know where to place such directive, should it be correct. -If I'm not mistaken, I should be able to modify the properties of a single object using for example \once \override Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length, placed somewhere before the object I want to modify. Is it correct ? -If so, is there a way to get the property of a particular single object ? I've seen that there's a user settable property of the lyric-extender-interface called next. How can I access this ? Could it be of some help for my current problem ? I'm sorry if my questions look somehow messy, and not rigorous (I may be confused between different concepts, such as properties, interfaces...) Yann ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New try with lyric extender
Hi Yann, On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Yann yann@free.fr wrote: Hello all :) I wanted to try again to find a solution to adapt the length of a lyric extender in order to take into account all voices in a SATB hymn, as I described sometimes ago in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-11/msg00810.html and following messages. So I read some sections of the learning manual (about modifying properties and tweaking, which I still don't fully understand). Using the notation manual and internals reference, I found that lyric extenders are object of the kind Lyrics.LyricExtender . Am I correct till there ? Then, I have the following questions : -Is there a way to display (to console for example) the value of a given property ? I tried with #(Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length) or \display Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length but I don't know where to place such directive, should it be correct. -If I'm not mistaken, I should be able to modify the properties of a single object using for example \once \override Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length, placed somewhere before the object I want to modify. Is it correct ? -If so, is there a way to get the property of a particular single object ? I've seen that there's a user settable property of the lyric-extender-interface called next. How can I access this ? Could it be of some help for my current problem ? I'm sorry if my questions look somehow messy, and not rigorous (I may be confused between different concepts, such as properties, interfaces...) It would be much easier to answer your questions if you post a minimal example of what you want to do. For example, there are several answers to -Is there a way to display (to console for example) the value of a given property ? but I hesitate to write a treatise :) --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New try with lyric extender
-Is there a way to display (to console for example) the value of a
given property ?
I tried with #(Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length) or \display
Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length but I don't know where to place
such directive, should it be correct.
It would be much easier to answer your questions if you post a minimal
example of what you want to do.
For example, there are several answers to
-Is there a way to display (to console for example) the value of a
given property ?
but I hesitate to write a treatise :)
I think this is a not working example for what he asked for:
\version 2.18.0
{
a a a a
}
\addlyrics {
A B C D
% what should be written here instead?
\display Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length
}
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Dynamics over-lapping with bar-lines
Thanks for your reply - it solves the problem of bar-line/dynamic collisions (or rather, it side-steps the problem). Actually it also begins to answer what might well have been my next question, because generally I prefer the left edge of dynamics to be related to the note position. But I should like it to be a little further to the left than the value of -1 gives. That is a bit of a problem, because the value required for a dynamic such as 'f' will be different from that needed by a wider marking such as ''. Is there perhaps a way of specifying where the left edge of the dynamic should be in relation to the note? For instance, I might like all dynamics to appear about half a note-head's width before the left edge of the note-head itself. It is going to get very tedious having continually to specify different self-alignment-X values when there are, say, alternating 'p' and 'mf' markings. Also, considering that LilyPond is generally so good at avoiding collisions, I have been surprised to find that it seems to have no objection to printing dynamics and bar-lines on top of one another. Is there no way to tell it to avoid these collisions? I would have expected avoidance to be the default, with an override to allow collisions if that is what is wanted in a particular case. But the default appears to be that bar-lines and dynamics pay no regard for each other. Am I missing something here? David On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 03:04 -0500, Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote: Greetings David, Following the problem I was having with dynamics in a flute part and a piano part not lining up, on the advice of the list I upgraded my LilyPond from v2.14.2 to 2.18.0. Problem of non-alignment solved. But I still find that dynamics often contact or even cross a bar-line. In the flute part of this piece it does not matter, of course, because the bar-line does not extend beyond the stave. But in the piano part it does matter. The problem is the same whether the dynamic marks are added in a Staff context or in a separate Dynamics context. How do I tell LilyPond not to superimpose dynamics and bar-lines? David Now that you have successfully upgraded to LilyPond 2.18.0, the command which I earlier gave you should work - namely, \override Staff.DynamicText.self-alignment-X = #-1 If your dynamics are in a Dynamics context rather than a Staff context, then change Staff in the above command to Dynamics. The default horizontal position for DynamicText is #0, or centered. #1 right-aligns the dynamics; #-1 left-aligns them. Other numbers, whether between or outside of these bounds, will work as well. I hope this helps. Please take care. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tempo placement
Am 03.02.2014 15:15, schrieb Robin Bannister: Marc Hohl wrote: Try \once \override Score.LeftEdge.break-visibility = #all-visible Thanks, sounds plausible, but it doesn't work either: Umm ... and with MetronomeMark ? D'Oh... Works significantly better ;-) Sorry for mixing up MetronomeMark and RehearsalMark, I use both in my real-life example, so I got confused somehow. Marc Cheers, Robin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Adding markup to percent repeat sign
That works very well and is easy. It appears to add a little space on
the sides but it's something I can live with. Thank you very much!
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:41 PM, TaoCG tao_lilypondu...@gmx.net wrote:
David Bellows wrote
Hello all,
I'm writing a kind of minimalist piece that has a lot of repeated
measures that I would like to notate using the percent repeat symbol
with text above it like 8x or any other arbitrary text.
The built-in functionality does not seem to allow for this unless I'm
missing something. I found a snippet to generate a percent repeat
sign:
makePercent =
#(define-music-function (parser location note) (ly:music?)
Make a percent repeat the same length as NOTE.
(make-music 'PercentEvent
'length (ly:music-length note)))
But this does not allow me to add \markup to it like:
\version 2.19.1
\score {
c e g c | \makePercent s1^\markup{8x}
}
The normal \repeat percent 8 {blah} approach does not work because it
creates a lot of measures with the repeat sign and I just want the one
measure.
I've seen solutions for spanning a selection with a spanner like
--3x-- but that's not what I want nor do I want to use voltas
(and I believe I saw a solution for putting the 8x over the bar line
which is not what I want either).
I'm fairly certain I've seen this notation before in other scores.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
you can prepend your percent repeats with this:
s1*0^\markup text
I think this should give you the output you're looking for.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Adding-markup-to-percent-repeat-sign-tp158763p158766.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ChordNames context with bar lines - vertical spacing issue
Hello, I am trying to design a simple chord sheet in LilyPond - just chords
and bar lines. I found this snippet at the repository, that enables me to do
that without creating any staves: (http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=460)
\new ChordNames \with {
\override BarLine #'bar-extent = #'(-2 . 2)
\consists Bar_engraver
}
\chordmode {
f1:maj7 f:7 bes:7 f:7 \break
f1:maj7 f:7 bes:7 f:7
}
My problem is that the vertical spacing between the lines leaves quite a bit
of empty space. How can I decrease the spacing? With staves it is simple,
but there is no staves object here...
Thank you!
Piotr
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Chained glissando runs out of paper
Hello,
I have a part for voice where both hands should play glissandi
alternatively for some measures. So when one glissando stops the other just
started. It looks like as Lilypond avoids a line break in a glissando. The
composer added a lot of thes measures. Unfortunately \break doesn't cause a
line break.
Each staff for itself is set fine by Lilypond. How can I combine both
staves?
Best regards
Helge
\version 2.18.0
\language deutsch
\header {
title = MAGYAR KÉPEK
subtitle = Melódia
composer = Bela Bartók
}
upper = \relative c'' {
\key as \minor \time 3/4
ges4\glissando s s | as'' des,,, des'|
\repeat unfold 10 {
ges,4\glissando s s | as'' des,,, des'|
}
}
lower = \relative c {
\key as \minor \time 3/4 \clef bass
r4 des des' |
\repeat unfold 11 {
ges,,\glissando s s | as'' des,, des' |
}
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff \upper \lower
}
\markup { upper hand }
\score { \upper }
\markup { lower hand }
\score { \lower }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Chained glissando runs out of paper
Hi Helge, On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Helge Kruse helge.kr...@gmx.net wrote: Hello, I have a part for voice where both hands should play glissandi alternatively for some measures. So when one glissando stops the other just started. It looks like as Lilypond avoids a line break in a glissando. The composer added a lot of thes measures. Unfortunately \break doesn't cause a line break. Check this link, at making glissandi breakable: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#glissando --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ChordNames context with bar lines - vertical spacing issue
Hi Piotr,
I think this could help you.
Cheers,
Joram
\new ChordNames \with {
\override BarLine #'bar-extent = #'(-2 . 2)
\consists Bar_engraver
}
\chordmode {
f1:maj7 f:7 bes:7 f:7 \break
f1:maj7 f:7 bes:7 f:7
}
% This reduces the distance between the lines to a minimum.
% Please adjust the numbers to your needs!
\paper {
system-system-spacing.basic-distance = #0
system-system-spacing.padding = #0
system-system-spacing.minimum-distance = #0
}
% This removes the bar numbers which is perhaps not wanted
% but it also saves space.
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\remove Bar_number_engraver
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ChordNames context with bar lines - vertical spacing issue
Noeck noeck.marburg at gmx.de writes: Hi Piotr, I think this could help you. This is exactly what I needed, thank you so much! Piotr ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New try with lyric extender
For example, there are several answers to
-Is there a way to display (to console for example) the value of a
given property ?
but I hesitate to write a treatise :)
I think this is a not working example for what he asked for:
\version 2.18.0
{
a a a a
}
\addlyrics {
A B C D
% what should be written here instead?
\display Lyrics.LyricExtender.minimum-length
}
Joram
Thank you both for your answers. Yes Joram, this is would be a not
working minimal example for my 1st question. I'm sorry, as I'm not
that comfortable with this, so I didn't know how I could design this
example.
Sorry also, I didn't fully explained what is my final goal with all
this, but just cited a previous post. For next time, what is the best
way to do ? Repost all the background+example, or just give reference
to the previous post ?
Yann
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
MuseScore Front End
Hey everyone, I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore before and I've looked into it quickly tonight. I'm confused about one aspect of it - does it actually /use /LilyPond for it's engraving? Or is it a completely separate and stand-alone engraving software that outputs on its own? I didn't know if it was some sort of front end like Frescobaldi or simply not Lily-/anything /at all. Ben - composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) -- http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/MuseScore-Front-End-tp158806.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: MuseScore Front End
Hi Ben. It's stand-alone (like Sibelius/Finale). I used it before I knew better, I mean, knew about Lilypond. Graeme On 4-Feb 13:08, SoundsFromSound wrote: Hey everyone, I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore before and I've looked into it quickly tonight. I'm confused about one aspect of it - does it actually /use /LilyPond for it's engraving? Or is it a completely separate and stand-alone engraving software that outputs on its own? I didn't know if it was some sort of front end like Frescobaldi or simply not Lily-/anything /at all. Ben - composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) -- http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/MuseScore-Front-End-tp158806.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: MuseScore Front End
Graeme Lee wrote Hi Ben. It's stand-alone (like Sibelius/Finale). I used it before I knew better, I mean, knew about Lilypond. Graeme On 4-Feb 13:08, SoundsFromSound wrote: Hey everyone, I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore before and I've looked into it quickly tonight. I'm confused about one aspect of it - does it actually /use /LilyPond for it's engraving? Or is it a completely separate and stand-alone engraving software that outputs on its own? I didn't know if it was some sort of front end like Frescobaldi or simply not Lily-/anything /at all. Ben - composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) -- http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- Hi Graeme, Oh ok thanks! I couldn't quite tell for sure because at a /quick /glance MuseScore output looks a little like Lilypond, but then again once you /really /look, not really at all. My eyes were clearly playing tricks on me I guess. Ben - composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) -- http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/MuseScore-Front-End-tp158806p158808.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: MuseScore Front End
Hi Graeme, Oh ok thanks! I couldn't quite tell for sure because at a /quick /glance MuseScore output looks a little like Lilypond, but then again once you /really /look, not really at all. My eyes were clearly playing tricks on me I guess. Ben Musescore uses the feta font (slightly modified) - which is why it might look almost identical at first glance. Regards, Graeme ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: MuseScore Front End
Graeme Lee wrote Hi Graeme, Oh ok thanks! I couldn't quite tell for sure because at a /quick /glance MuseScore output looks a little like Lilypond, but then again once you /really /look, not really at all. My eyes were clearly playing tricks on me I guess. Ben Musescore uses the feta font (slightly modified) - which is why it might look almost identical at first glance. Regards, Graeme ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user That would explain it :) - composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) -- http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/MuseScore-Front-End-tp158806p158810.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: MuseScore Front End
Il 04/feb/2014 03:09 SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com ha scritto: Hey everyone, I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore before and I've looked into it quickly tonight. I'm confused about one aspect of it - does it actually /use /LilyPond for it's engraving? Or is it a completely separate and stand-alone engraving software that outputs on its own? I didn't know if it was some sort of front end like Frescobaldi or simply not Lily-/anything /at all. Janek told me that they use the Feta font, which might lead to think that the typesetting engine' is lilypond. But MuseScore has its own typesetting engine. Some weeks ago it's been reported here a tweet saying that MuseScore developers will drop the lilypond export and focus on musicxml export. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Chained glissando runs out of paper
Thanks, works fine. I must admit that reading the fine manual would have easier than producing the stripped down example. Regards Helge 2014-02-03 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com: Hi Helge, On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Helge Kruse helge.kr...@gmx.net wrote: Hello, I have a part for voice where both hands should play glissandi alternatively for some measures. So when one glissando stops the other just started. It looks like as Lilypond avoids a line break in a glissando. The composer added a lot of thes measures. Unfortunately \break doesn't cause a line break. Check this link, at making glissandi breakable: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#glissando --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: MuseScore Front End
Federico Bruni writes: Some weeks ago it's been reported here a tweet saying that MuseScore developers will drop the lilypond export and focus on musicxml export. Yes, I had a chat about that with Thomas Bonte. LilyPond export was in dire need of some love and the best thing to do with code that needs a lot of love and does not get it, is to throw it out. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Any Finale/Sibelius forum members here?
I relay this question : The Git repository seems unpleasant. Couldn't there be an imslp work page to submit our candidate scores? Cheers, Pierre ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
