Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] dssi question
On Sunday 05 Dec 2004 22:38, Hans Fugal wrote: The DSSI JACK host will always try to start a user interface for each plugin it loads. (It could easily have a command line switch to tell it not to, but there isn't one at the moment.) Attached is a patch. Committed to DSSI CVS, thanks. Chris
Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa 2 idea
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 08:19:52PM -0500, Taybin Rutkin wrote: I don't know if this is completely dead or just a little dead but I had an idea today. It'd be kinda neat if there was a mechanism for grouping related control ports together in the UI. There was one that was accepted I think: LFO 1/rate LFO 1/shape LFO 2/rate LFO 2/shape FWIW, LADSPA 2 does seem to be dead, I've not head any discussion of it recently. I'm still keen, but I think the pressure is very low, as theres little apparently wrong with LADSPA and a lot of inertia. - Steve
Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more
Hello! Though I read about 50 percent of this thread, I don't know where exactly to add this replay. So I put it topmost. Eric S. Raymond has an opinion about that in his paper called The Magic Cauldron (17. Appendix: Why Closing Drivers Loses A Vender Money): http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/magic-cauldron/magic-cauldron.html Read the whole paper if you wanna know, in which cases open or closed source makes sense. Andi
Re: [linux-audio-dev] TAKE ACTION - RME customers and linux audio users please read
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 03:59:15AM +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote: Additional note: Since i've been involved in discussions on that forum, it would be better if anybody else volunteered to start the thread. i could do that, but sorry, was out for a few days and i am very busy ATM. will do that tomorrow or at latest the day after tomorrow (if nobody else does it). bests, martin
