Re: augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
Steve, thanks. I am finally back in my environment looking for the problem-syntax based on your feedback. I found nothing that matches "key= " or "-k ". I don't see the error anymore. Perhaps a coworker addressed it. -- Warron French On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:38 PM Steve Grubb wrote: > Hello, > > On Thursday, May 20, 2021 12:08:56 PM EDT Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:56:00 AM EDT warron.french wrote: > > > Does anybody know what this error means? > > > augenrules: -F missing operation for -k > > > > > > I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little > > > more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under > > > /etc/audit/rules.d. > > > > It means there is no value associated with a -F name=value construct. > > Actually, I misspoke. In the name=vale portion, it didn't find the '=' > where > one was expected. Since it mentions '-k', you might be mixing watch syntax > with syscall syntax. -k keyname is valid with watches. For syscalls its > -F > key=keyname. > > -Steve > > > I am thinking syslog should have the line number in the rules where this > > comes from. Do you a -k some where that doesn't look right? > > > > > -- > Linux-audit mailing list > Linux-audit@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit > > -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
Re: augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
Hello, On Thursday, May 20, 2021 12:08:56 PM EDT Steve Grubb wrote: > On Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:56:00 AM EDT warron.french wrote: > > Does anybody know what this error means? > > augenrules: -F missing operation for -k > > > > I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little > > more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under > > /etc/audit/rules.d. > > It means there is no value associated with a -F name=value construct. Actually, I misspoke. In the name=vale portion, it didn't find the '=' where one was expected. Since it mentions '-k', you might be mixing watch syntax with syscall syntax. -k keyname is valid with watches. For syscalls its -F key=keyname. -Steve > I am thinking syslog should have the line number in the rules where this > comes from. Do you a -k some where that doesn't look right? -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
Re: augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:56:00 AM EDT warron.french wrote: > Does anybody know what this error means? > augenrules: -F missing operation for -k > > I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little > more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under > /etc/audit/rules.d. It means there is no value associated with a -F name=value construct. I am thinking syslog should have the line number in the rules where this comes from. Do you a -k some where that doesn't look right? -Steve -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
Does anybody know what this error means? augenrules: -F missing operation for -k I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under /etc/audit/rules.d. Thanks in advance, -- Warron French -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
