Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support

2018-07-26 Thread Omar Sandoval
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:31:32PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 09:35:53AM -0700, James Smart wrote:
> > make sure this fix has been picked up in your kernel:
> > http://git.infradead.org/nvme.git/commit/6cdefc6e2ad52170f89a8d0e8b1a1339f91834dc
> > 
> > deletes were broken otherwise and have the exact trace below.
> > 
> > -- james
> 
> Thanks, James, that indeed fixes the problem. I'll go ahead and merge
> these tests since there's a fix in flight.

By "these tests", I mean Chaitanya's tests, Hannes still has some
comments to resolve :)


Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support

2018-07-26 Thread Omar Sandoval
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 09:35:53AM -0700, James Smart wrote:
> make sure this fix has been picked up in your kernel:
> http://git.infradead.org/nvme.git/commit/6cdefc6e2ad52170f89a8d0e8b1a1339f91834dc
> 
> deletes were broken otherwise and have the exact trace below.
> 
> -- james

Thanks, James, that indeed fixes the problem. I'll go ahead and merge
these tests since there's a fix in flight.


Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support

2018-07-26 Thread James Smart

make sure this fix has been picked up in your kernel:
http://git.infradead.org/nvme.git/commit/6cdefc6e2ad52170f89a8d0e8b1a1339f91834dc

deletes were broken otherwise and have the exact trace below.

-- james


On 7/25/2018 7:01 PM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:

Thanks for the report and correction. I was able to run the test and reproduce 
the problem, I also confirm that it is not that consistent.

As I suspected the problem is in the nvme disconnect in the following call 
chain:-


nvme_sysfs_delete
  nvme_delete_ctrl_sync
    nvme_delete_ctrl_work
     nvme_remove_namespaces
      nvme_ns_remove
        nvme_ns_remove
          blk_cleanup_queue
        blk_freeze_queue
              blk_freeze_queue_start
            wait_event(q->mq_freeze_wq, 
percpu_ref_is_zero(&q->q_usage_counter)); <- Stuck here.
 
blk_cleanup_queue() that's where it is blocking and then target ctrl is timing out on keep alive.


It will take some time for me to debug and find a fix let's merge this test 
once we fix this issue.



How should we go about other tests ? should we merge them and keep this one out 
in the nvmeof branch?
Regards,
Chaitanya



From: Omar Sandoval 
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 2:00 PM
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni
Cc: Hannes Reinecke; Omar Sandoval; Christoph Hellwig; Sagi Grimberg; Keith 
Busch; linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support
   
  
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 07:27:35PM +, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:

Thanks, Omar.

Tests nvme/014 and nvme/015 had a pretty bad typo that I didn't notice
last time:

dd=/dev/urandom of="/dev/${nvmedev}n1" count=128000 bs=4k

That should be

dd if=/dev/urandom of="/dev/${nvmedev}n1" count=128000 bs=4k status=none

When I fix that (and change the nvme flush call as mentioned before), I
sometimes get a hung task:

[  273.80] run blktests nvme/015 at 2018-07-25 13:44:11
[  273.861950] nvmet: adding nsid 1 to subsystem blktests-subsystem-1
[  273.875014] nvmet: creating controller 1 for subsystem blktests-subsystem-1 
for NQN nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress:uuid:c5e36fdf-8e4d-4c27-be56-da373db583b2.
[  273.877457] nvme nvme1: creating 4 I/O queues.
[  273.879141] nvme nvme1: new ctrl: "blktests-subsystem-1"
[  276.247708] nvme nvme1: using deprecated NVME_IOCTL_IO_CMD ioctl on the char 
device!
[  276.262835] nvme nvme1: Removing ctrl: NQN "blktests-subsystem-1"
[  289.755361] nvmet: ctrl 1 keep-alive timer (15 seconds) expired!
[  289.760579] nvmet: ctrl 1 fatal error occurred!
[  491.095890] INFO: task kworker/u8:0:7 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  491.104407]   Not tainted 4.18.0-rc6 #18
[  491.108330] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this 
message.
[  491.116521] kworker/u8:0    D    0 7  2 0x8000
[  491.121754] Workqueue: nvme-delete-wq nvme_delete_ctrl_work [nvme_core]
[  491.129604] Call Trace:
[  491.131611]  ? __schedule+0x2a1/0x890
[  491.135112]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x20/0x40
[  491.140542]  schedule+0x32/0x90
[  491.142030]  blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x41/0xa0
[  491.144186]  ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
[  491.145726]  blk_cleanup_queue+0x75/0x160
[  491.150235]  nvme_ns_remove+0xf9/0x130 [nvme_core]
[  491.151910]  nvme_remove_namespaces+0x86/0xc0 [nvme_core]
[  491.153127]  nvme_delete_ctrl_work+0x4b/0x80 [nvme_core]
[  491.154727]  process_one_work+0x18c/0x360
[  491.155428]  worker_thread+0x1c6/0x380
[  491.156160]  ? process_one_work+0x360/0x360
[  491.157493]  kthread+0x112/0x130
[  491.159119]  ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
[  491.160008]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[  491.160729] INFO: task nvme:1139 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  491.162416]   Not tainted 4.18.0-rc6 #18
[  491.164348] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this 
message.
[  491.166012] nvme    D    0  1139   1072 0x
[  491.167946] Call Trace:
[  491.168459]  ? __schedule+0x2a1/0x890
[  491.169312]  schedule+0x32/0x90
[  491.170180]  schedule_timeout+0x311/0x4a0
[  491.171921]  ? kernfs_fop_release+0xa0/0xa0
[  491.172884]  wait_for_common+0x1a0/0x1d0
[  491.173813]  ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
[  491.174410]  flush_work+0x10e/0x1c0
[  491.174991]  ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x130/0x130
[  491.176113]  nvme_delete_ctrl_sync+0x41/0x50 [nvme_core]
[  491.177969]  nvme_sysfs_delete+0x28/0x30 [nvme_core]
[  491.178632]  kernfs_fop_write+0x116/0x190
[  491.179254]  __vfs_write+0x36/0x190
[  491.179812]  vfs_write+0xa9/0x190
[  491.180344]  ksys_write+0x4f/0xb0
[  491.181056]  do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x170
[  491.181583]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[  491.182311] RIP: 0033:0x7fc04176b9d4
[  491.182863] Code: Bad RIP value.
[  491.183650] RSP: 002b:7ffc33bd15a8 EFLAGS: 0246 ORIG_RAX: 
0001
[  491.184622] RAX: ffda RBX: 0004 RCX: 7fc04176b9d4
[  49

Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support

2018-07-25 Thread Chaitanya Kulkarni


Thanks for the report and correction. I was able to run the test and reproduce 
the problem, I also confirm that it is not that consistent.

As I suspected the problem is in the nvme disconnect in the following call 
chain:-


nvme_sysfs_delete
 nvme_delete_ctrl_sync
   nvme_delete_ctrl_work
    nvme_remove_namespaces
     nvme_ns_remove
       nvme_ns_remove
         blk_cleanup_queue
       blk_freeze_queue
             blk_freeze_queue_start
           wait_event(q->mq_freeze_wq, 
percpu_ref_is_zero(&q->q_usage_counter)); <- Stuck here.
        
blk_cleanup_queue() that's where it is blocking and then target ctrl is timing 
out on keep alive.

It will take some time for me to debug and find a fix let's merge this test 
once we fix this issue.



How should we go about other tests ? should we merge them and keep this one out 
in the nvmeof branch?
Regards,
Chaitanya



From: Omar Sandoval 
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 2:00 PM
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni
Cc: Hannes Reinecke; Omar Sandoval; Christoph Hellwig; Sagi Grimberg; Keith 
Busch; linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support
  
 
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 07:27:35PM +, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Omar.

Tests nvme/014 and nvme/015 had a pretty bad typo that I didn't notice
last time:

dd=/dev/urandom of="/dev/${nvmedev}n1" count=128000 bs=4k

That should be

dd if=/dev/urandom of="/dev/${nvmedev}n1" count=128000 bs=4k status=none

When I fix that (and change the nvme flush call as mentioned before), I
sometimes get a hung task:

[  273.80] run blktests nvme/015 at 2018-07-25 13:44:11
[  273.861950] nvmet: adding nsid 1 to subsystem blktests-subsystem-1
[  273.875014] nvmet: creating controller 1 for subsystem blktests-subsystem-1 
for NQN nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress:uuid:c5e36fdf-8e4d-4c27-be56-da373db583b2.
[  273.877457] nvme nvme1: creating 4 I/O queues.
[  273.879141] nvme nvme1: new ctrl: "blktests-subsystem-1"
[  276.247708] nvme nvme1: using deprecated NVME_IOCTL_IO_CMD ioctl on the char 
device!
[  276.262835] nvme nvme1: Removing ctrl: NQN "blktests-subsystem-1"
[  289.755361] nvmet: ctrl 1 keep-alive timer (15 seconds) expired!
[  289.760579] nvmet: ctrl 1 fatal error occurred!
[  491.095890] INFO: task kworker/u8:0:7 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  491.104407]   Not tainted 4.18.0-rc6 #18
[  491.108330] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this 
message.
[  491.116521] kworker/u8:0    D    0 7  2 0x8000
[  491.121754] Workqueue: nvme-delete-wq nvme_delete_ctrl_work [nvme_core]
[  491.129604] Call Trace:
[  491.131611]  ? __schedule+0x2a1/0x890
[  491.135112]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x20/0x40
[  491.140542]  schedule+0x32/0x90
[  491.142030]  blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x41/0xa0
[  491.144186]  ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
[  491.145726]  blk_cleanup_queue+0x75/0x160
[  491.150235]  nvme_ns_remove+0xf9/0x130 [nvme_core]
[  491.151910]  nvme_remove_namespaces+0x86/0xc0 [nvme_core]
[  491.153127]  nvme_delete_ctrl_work+0x4b/0x80 [nvme_core]
[  491.154727]  process_one_work+0x18c/0x360
[  491.155428]  worker_thread+0x1c6/0x380
[  491.156160]  ? process_one_work+0x360/0x360
[  491.157493]  kthread+0x112/0x130
[  491.159119]  ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
[  491.160008]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[  491.160729] INFO: task nvme:1139 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  491.162416]   Not tainted 4.18.0-rc6 #18
[  491.164348] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this 
message.
[  491.166012] nvme    D    0  1139   1072 0x
[  491.167946] Call Trace:
[  491.168459]  ? __schedule+0x2a1/0x890
[  491.169312]  schedule+0x32/0x90
[  491.170180]  schedule_timeout+0x311/0x4a0
[  491.171921]  ? kernfs_fop_release+0xa0/0xa0
[  491.172884]  wait_for_common+0x1a0/0x1d0
[  491.173813]  ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
[  491.174410]  flush_work+0x10e/0x1c0
[  491.174991]  ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x130/0x130
[  491.176113]  nvme_delete_ctrl_sync+0x41/0x50 [nvme_core]
[  491.177969]  nvme_sysfs_delete+0x28/0x30 [nvme_core]
[  491.178632]  kernfs_fop_write+0x116/0x190
[  491.179254]  __vfs_write+0x36/0x190
[  491.179812]  vfs_write+0xa9/0x190
[  491.180344]  ksys_write+0x4f/0xb0
[  491.181056]  do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x170
[  491.181583]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[  491.182311] RIP: 0033:0x7fc04176b9d4
[  491.182863] Code: Bad RIP value.
[  491.183650] RSP: 002b:7ffc33bd15a8 EFLAGS: 0246 ORIG_RAX: 
0001
[  491.184622] RAX: ffda RBX: 0004 RCX: 7fc04176b9d4
[  491.185606] RDX: 0001 RSI: 55884bd0810a RDI: 0004
[  491.186719] RBP:  R08:  R09: 000f
[  491.187684] R10:  R11: 0246 R12: 
[  491.189045] R13: 7ffc33bd2

Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support

2018-07-25 Thread Omar Sandoval
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 07:27:35PM +, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Omar.

Tests nvme/014 and nvme/015 had a pretty bad typo that I didn't notice
last time:

dd=/dev/urandom of="/dev/${nvmedev}n1" count=128000 bs=4k

That should be

dd if=/dev/urandom of="/dev/${nvmedev}n1" count=128000 bs=4k status=none

When I fix that (and change the nvme flush call as mentioned before), I
sometimes get a hung task:

[  273.80] run blktests nvme/015 at 2018-07-25 13:44:11
[  273.861950] nvmet: adding nsid 1 to subsystem blktests-subsystem-1
[  273.875014] nvmet: creating controller 1 for subsystem blktests-subsystem-1 
for NQN nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress:uuid:c5e36fdf-8e4d-4c27-be56-da373db583b2.
[  273.877457] nvme nvme1: creating 4 I/O queues.
[  273.879141] nvme nvme1: new ctrl: "blktests-subsystem-1"
[  276.247708] nvme nvme1: using deprecated NVME_IOCTL_IO_CMD ioctl on the char 
device!
[  276.262835] nvme nvme1: Removing ctrl: NQN "blktests-subsystem-1"
[  289.755361] nvmet: ctrl 1 keep-alive timer (15 seconds) expired!
[  289.760579] nvmet: ctrl 1 fatal error occurred!
[  491.095890] INFO: task kworker/u8:0:7 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  491.104407]   Not tainted 4.18.0-rc6 #18
[  491.108330] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this 
message.
[  491.116521] kworker/u8:0D0 7  2 0x8000
[  491.121754] Workqueue: nvme-delete-wq nvme_delete_ctrl_work [nvme_core]
[  491.129604] Call Trace:
[  491.131611]  ? __schedule+0x2a1/0x890
[  491.135112]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x20/0x40
[  491.140542]  schedule+0x32/0x90
[  491.142030]  blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x41/0xa0
[  491.144186]  ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
[  491.145726]  blk_cleanup_queue+0x75/0x160
[  491.150235]  nvme_ns_remove+0xf9/0x130 [nvme_core]
[  491.151910]  nvme_remove_namespaces+0x86/0xc0 [nvme_core]
[  491.153127]  nvme_delete_ctrl_work+0x4b/0x80 [nvme_core]
[  491.154727]  process_one_work+0x18c/0x360
[  491.155428]  worker_thread+0x1c6/0x380
[  491.156160]  ? process_one_work+0x360/0x360
[  491.157493]  kthread+0x112/0x130
[  491.159119]  ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
[  491.160008]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[  491.160729] INFO: task nvme:1139 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  491.162416]   Not tainted 4.18.0-rc6 #18
[  491.164348] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this 
message.
[  491.166012] nvmeD0  1139   1072 0x
[  491.167946] Call Trace:
[  491.168459]  ? __schedule+0x2a1/0x890
[  491.169312]  schedule+0x32/0x90
[  491.170180]  schedule_timeout+0x311/0x4a0
[  491.171921]  ? kernfs_fop_release+0xa0/0xa0
[  491.172884]  wait_for_common+0x1a0/0x1d0
[  491.173813]  ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
[  491.174410]  flush_work+0x10e/0x1c0
[  491.174991]  ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x130/0x130
[  491.176113]  nvme_delete_ctrl_sync+0x41/0x50 [nvme_core]
[  491.177969]  nvme_sysfs_delete+0x28/0x30 [nvme_core]
[  491.178632]  kernfs_fop_write+0x116/0x190
[  491.179254]  __vfs_write+0x36/0x190
[  491.179812]  vfs_write+0xa9/0x190
[  491.180344]  ksys_write+0x4f/0xb0
[  491.181056]  do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x170
[  491.181583]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[  491.182311] RIP: 0033:0x7fc04176b9d4
[  491.182863] Code: Bad RIP value.
[  491.183650] RSP: 002b:7ffc33bd15a8 EFLAGS: 0246 ORIG_RAX: 
0001
[  491.184622] RAX: ffda RBX: 0004 RCX: 7fc04176b9d4
[  491.185606] RDX: 0001 RSI: 55884bd0810a RDI: 0004
[  491.186719] RBP:  R08:  R09: 000f
[  491.187684] R10:  R11: 0246 R12: 
[  491.189045] R13: 7ffc33bd2c20 R14: 7ffc33bd15f0 R15: 0010

I pushed what I have to https://github.com/osandov/blktests/tree/nvmeof,
can you please take a look?


Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support

2018-07-25 Thread Chaitanya Kulkarni


Thanks, Omar.




From: Omar Sandoval 
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 12:17 PM
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni
Cc: Hannes Reinecke; Omar Sandoval; Christoph Hellwig; Sagi Grimberg; Keith 
Busch; linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support
  
 
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 09:23:32PM +, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
> 
> Thanks for the test, this is really helpful, please see my inline comments to 
> individual patches.
> 
> Also, the test number should be I guess 18, 14-17 testcases are still in the 
> queue.

Yeah, sorry about that, I'll take another look.

> Omar, can you please let us know when can you merge the remaining testcases 
> for NVMeOF
> from the first round that I've posted? so we can set the right number for 
> this.

No need to worry about the numbering, I can trivially renumber it here.

> 
> From: linux-block-ow...@vger.kernel.org  
> on behalf of Hannes Reinecke 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:31 AM
> To: Omar Sandoval
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; Sagi Grimberg; Keith Busch; 
> linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org; Hannes Reinecke
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support
>   
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> here's a small patchset for testing ANA base support.
> The test itself requires the ANA patchset from Christoph, plus
> the fixes I've sent to the mailing list earlier.
> 
> Hannes Reinecke (2):
>   blktests: enable ANA support
>   blktests: add test for ANA state transition
> 
>  tests/nvme/014 | 158 
> +
>  tests/nvme/014.out |  17 ++
>  tests/nvme/rc  |  49 -
>  3 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100755 tests/nvme/014
>  create mode 100644 tests/nvme/014.out
> 
> -- 
> 2.12.3
> 
> 


Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support

2018-07-25 Thread Omar Sandoval
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 09:23:32PM +, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
> 
> Thanks for the test, this is really helpful, please see my inline comments to 
> individual patches.
> 
> Also, the test number should be I guess 18, 14-17 testcases are still in the 
> queue.

Yeah, sorry about that, I'll take another look.

> Omar, can you please let us know when can you merge the remaining testcases 
> for NVMeOF
> from the first round that I've posted? so we can set the right number for 
> this.

No need to worry about the numbering, I can trivially renumber it here.

> 
> From: linux-block-ow...@vger.kernel.org  
> on behalf of Hannes Reinecke 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:31 AM
> To: Omar Sandoval
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; Sagi Grimberg; Keith Busch; 
> linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org; Hannes Reinecke
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support
>   
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> here's a small patchset for testing ANA base support.
> The test itself requires the ANA patchset from Christoph, plus
> the fixes I've sent to the mailing list earlier.
> 
> Hannes Reinecke (2):
>   blktests: enable ANA support
>   blktests: add test for ANA state transition
> 
>  tests/nvme/014 | 158 
> +
>  tests/nvme/014.out |  17 ++
>  tests/nvme/rc  |  49 -
>  3 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100755 tests/nvme/014
>  create mode 100644 tests/nvme/014.out
> 
> -- 
> 2.12.3
> 
> 


Re: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support

2018-07-21 Thread Chaitanya Kulkarni
Hi Hannes,

Thanks for the test, this is really helpful, please see my inline comments to 
individual patches.

Also, the test number should be I guess 18, 14-17 testcases are still in the 
queue.

Omar, can you please let us know when can you merge the remaining testcases for 
NVMeOF
from the first round that I've posted? so we can set the right number for this.

From: linux-block-ow...@vger.kernel.org  on 
behalf of Hannes Reinecke 
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:31 AM
To: Omar Sandoval
Cc: Christoph Hellwig; Sagi Grimberg; Keith Busch; 
linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org; Hannes Reinecke
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support
  
 
Hi all,

here's a small patchset for testing ANA base support.
The test itself requires the ANA patchset from Christoph, plus
the fixes I've sent to the mailing list earlier.

Hannes Reinecke (2):
  blktests: enable ANA support
  blktests: add test for ANA state transition

 tests/nvme/014 | 158 +
 tests/nvme/014.out |  17 ++
 tests/nvme/rc  |  49 -
 3 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 tests/nvme/014
 create mode 100644 tests/nvme/014.out

-- 
2.12.3



[PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support

2018-07-17 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Hi all,

here's a small patchset for testing ANA base support.
The test itself requires the ANA patchset from Christoph, plus
the fixes I've sent to the mailing list earlier.

Hannes Reinecke (2):
  blktests: enable ANA support
  blktests: add test for ANA state transition

 tests/nvme/014 | 158 +
 tests/nvme/014.out |  17 ++
 tests/nvme/rc  |  49 -
 3 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 tests/nvme/014
 create mode 100644 tests/nvme/014.out

-- 
2.12.3