Re: [PATCH V6 2/6] block: tracking request allocation with q_usage_counter

2017-09-27 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 09/27/2017 07:48 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> This usage is basically same with blk-mq, so that we can
> support to freeze legacy queue easily.
> 
> Also 'wake_up_all(>mq_freeze_wq)' has to be moved
> into blk_set_queue_dying() since both legacy and blk-mq
> may wait on the wait queue of .mq_freeze_wq.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei 
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c | 14 ++
>  block/blk-mq.c   |  7 ---
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
As indicated in the other (similar) patch from Bart, we have a customer
report running into a q_usage_counter underflow with legacy-sq.
So this patch is actually a bugfix.

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke 

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes ReineckeTeamlead Storage & Networking
h...@suse.de   +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)


[PATCH V6 2/6] block: tracking request allocation with q_usage_counter

2017-09-26 Thread Ming Lei
This usage is basically same with blk-mq, so that we can
support to freeze legacy queue easily.

Also 'wake_up_all(>mq_freeze_wq)' has to be moved
into blk_set_queue_dying() since both legacy and blk-mq
may wait on the wait queue of .mq_freeze_wq.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei 
---
 block/blk-core.c | 14 ++
 block/blk-mq.c   |  7 ---
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index aebe676225e6..abfba798ee03 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -610,6 +610,12 @@ void blk_set_queue_dying(struct request_queue *q)
}
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
}
+
+   /*
+* We need to ensure that processes currently waiting on
+* the queue are notified as well.
+*/
+   wake_up_all(>mq_freeze_wq);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_set_queue_dying);
 
@@ -1392,16 +1398,21 @@ static struct request *blk_old_get_request(struct 
request_queue *q,
   unsigned int op, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
struct request *rq;
+   int ret = 0;
 
WARN_ON_ONCE(q->mq_ops);
 
/* create ioc upfront */
create_io_context(gfp_mask, q->node);
 
+   ret = blk_queue_enter(q, !(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM));
+   if (ret)
+   return ERR_PTR(ret);
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
rq = get_request(q, op, NULL, gfp_mask);
if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+   blk_queue_exit(q);
return rq;
}
 
@@ -1573,6 +1584,7 @@ void __blk_put_request(struct request_queue *q, struct 
request *req)
blk_free_request(rl, req);
freed_request(rl, sync, rq_flags);
blk_put_rl(rl);
+   blk_queue_exit(q);
}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__blk_put_request);
@@ -1854,8 +1866,10 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, 
struct bio *bio)
 * Grab a free request. This is might sleep but can not fail.
 * Returns with the queue unlocked.
 */
+   blk_queue_enter_live(q);
req = get_request(q, bio->bi_opf, bio, GFP_NOIO);
if (IS_ERR(req)) {
+   blk_queue_exit(q);
__wbt_done(q->rq_wb, wb_acct);
if (PTR_ERR(req) == -ENOMEM)
bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 6fd9f86fc86d..10c1f49f663d 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -256,13 +256,6 @@ void blk_mq_wake_waiters(struct request_queue *q)
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i)
if (blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(hctx))
blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(hctx->tags, true);
-
-   /*
-* If we are called because the queue has now been marked as
-* dying, we need to ensure that processes currently waiting on
-* the queue are notified as well.
-*/
-   wake_up_all(>mq_freeze_wq);
 }
 
 bool blk_mq_can_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
-- 
2.9.5