Re: [PATCH v3 01/49] block: drbd: comment on direct access bvec table

2017-08-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I really don't think that these comments are all that useful.
A big comment near the bi_io_vec field defintion explaining the rules
for access would be a lot better.


[PATCH v3 01/49] block: drbd: comment on direct access bvec table

2017-08-08 Thread Ming Lei
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei 
---
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c
index 809fd245c3dc..70890d950dc9 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c
@@ -953,6 +953,7 @@ static void drbd_bm_endio(struct bio *bio)
struct drbd_bm_aio_ctx *ctx = bio->bi_private;
struct drbd_device *device = ctx->device;
struct drbd_bitmap *b = device->bitmap;
+   /* single page bio, safe for multipage bvec */
unsigned int idx = bm_page_to_idx(bio->bi_io_vec[0].bv_page);
 
if ((ctx->flags & BM_AIO_COPY_PAGES) == 0 &&
-- 
2.9.4