Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: add a check of whether fs_info->fs_root is NULL in btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space()

2015-10-21 Thread Tsutomu Itoh

On 2015/10/21 20:27, David Sterba wrote:

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:20:00PM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:

Kernel panic occurred due to NULL pointer reference in can_overcommit().
Because btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space() passed NULL pointer to
btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size().



fs_info->fs_root is referred in btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space()
when mount kicked kworker(btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space).

But at this time, fs_info->fs_root had not been initialized yet,
so NULL pointer passed to btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size().


I don't think it's the right fix, the initialization sequence should
take care of such situations. The fs_tree must exist at the time we
reach the point where it crashed, the code expects it.


OK. I will try to change initialization sequence.

Thanks,
Tsutomu


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] Btrfs: add a check of whether fs_info->fs_root is NULL in btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space()

2015-10-21 Thread Tsutomu Itoh
Kernel panic occurred due to NULL pointer reference in can_overcommit().
Because btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space() passed NULL pointer to
btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size().


[ 3756.152833] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 
01f0
[ 3756.152882] IP: [] can_overcommit+0x21/0xf0 [btrfs]
[ 3756.152936] PGD 0
[ 3756.152949] Oops:  [#1] SMP
[ 3756.152969] Modules linked in: ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 
xt_conntrack ebtable_filter ebtable_broute bridge stp llc ebtable_nat 
ebtables ip6table_mangle ip6table_raw ip6table_security ip6table_nat 
nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_nat_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables 
iptable_mangle iptable_raw iptable_security iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 
nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack coretemp kvm_intel kvm crc32
_pclmul iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support microcode ipmi_si lpc_ich mfd_core pcspkr 
acpi_power_meter ipmi_msghandler i2c_i801 i7core_edac shpchp edac_core 
nfsd acpi_cpufreq auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc sch_fq_codel btrfs xor 
raid6_pq usb_storage mgag200 drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect 
sysimgblt fb_sys_fops ttm drm igb ptp ata_generic pps_core pata_acpi 
crc32c_intel
[ 3756.153397]  dca megaraid_sas i2c_algo_bit ata_piix i2c_core
[ 3756.153433] CPU: 3 PID: 3004 Comm: kworker/u25:4 Tainted: G  I 
4.3.0-rc6 #1
[ 3756.153469] Hardware name: FUJITSU-SV   PRIMERGY RX300 
S6 /D2619, BIOS 6.00 Rev. 1.09.2619.N1   12/13/2010
[ 3756.153537] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space 
[btrfs]
[ 3756.153571] task: 88023581a400 ti: 880234648000 task.ti: 
880234648000
[ 3756.153604] RIP: 0010:[]  [] 
can_overcommit+0x21/0xf0 [btrfs]
[ 3756.153655] RSP: 0018:88023464bda8  EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 3756.153679] RAX: 0100 RBX: 880431f68c00 RCX: 0002
[ 3756.153711] RDX: 00c0 RSI:  RDI: 
[ 3756.153742] RBP: 88023464bde0 R08: 0101 R09: 000c
[ 3756.153773] R10: 81d10060 R11: 81d10050 R12: 880431f68c00
[ 3756.153804] R13:  R14: 880035f67070 R15: 00c0
[ 3756.153836] FS:  () GS:880237cc() 
knlGS:
[ 3756.153871] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 8005003b
[ 3756.153897] CR2: 01f0 CR3: 01c08000 CR4: 06e0
[ 3756.153929] Stack:
[ 3756.153940]  8802 880237cd2940 880431f68c00 

[ 3756.153979]  00c0 880035f67070  
88023464be20
[ 3756.154016]  a01e5404 880431f68c80 880234482240 
8802378a1800
[ 3756.154054] Call Trace:
[ 3756.154081]  [] 
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0xb4/0x210 [btrfs]
[ 3756.154119]  [] process_one_work+0x19e/0x3d0
[ 3756.154146]  [] worker_thread+0x4e/0x450
[ 3756.154174]  [] ? __schedule+0x2b9/0x930
[ 3756.154199]  [] ? process_one_work+0x3d0/0x3d0
[ 3756.154227]  [] ? process_one_work+0x3d0/0x3d0
[ 3756.154255]  [] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
[ 3756.154279]  [] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x160/0x160
[ 3756.154307]  [] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
[ 3756.154333]  [] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x160/0x160
[ 3756.154361] Code: a5 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 66 66 66 90 55 48 89 e5 
41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 49 89 f4 53 31 f6 49 89 fd 49 89 d7 48 83 ec 10 
<4c> 8b b7 f0 01 00 00 89 4d cc 49 3b 7e 30 40 0f 95 c6 48 8d 74
[ 3756.156802] RIP  [] can_overcommit+0x21/0xf0 [btrfs]
[ 3756.157995]  RSP 
[ 3756.159162] CR2: 01f0


fs_info->fs_root is referred in btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space()
when mount kicked kworker(btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space).

But at this time, fs_info->fs_root had not been initialized yet,
so NULL pointer passed to btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size().


PID: 3045   TASK: 8800bb06b000  CPU: 2   COMMAND: "mount"
[exception RIP: queued_spin_lock_slowpath+350]
RIP: 810be2de  RSP: 8800b9fdb738  RFLAGS: 0202
RAX: 0101  RBX: 880431f68c00  RCX: 0001
RDX: 0101  RSI: 0001  RDI: 880431f68c00
RBP: 8800b9fdb738   R8: 0101   R9: 
R10: 4000  R11: 00018e58  R12: 0001
R13: 8800b9fdb7c0  R14: 8800bb06b000  R15: 0001
CS: 0010  SS: 0018
 #0 [8800b9fdb740] _raw_spin_lock at 81694ff0
 #1 [8800b9fdb750] reserve_metadata_bytes at a01e55cc [btrfs]
 #2 [8800b9fdb800] btrfs_block_rsv_add at a01e5a93 [btrfs]
 #3 [8800b9fdb828] btrfs_truncate_inode_items at a0202779 [btrfs]
 #4 [8800b9fdb920] btrfs_evict_inode at a02040ec [btrfs]
 #5 [8800b9fdb990] evict at 811ed6ea
 #6 

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: add a check of whether fs_info->fs_root is NULL in btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space()

2015-10-21 Thread David Sterba
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:20:00PM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
> Kernel panic occurred due to NULL pointer reference in can_overcommit().
> Because btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space() passed NULL pointer to
> btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size().

> fs_info->fs_root is referred in btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space()
> when mount kicked kworker(btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space).
> 
> But at this time, fs_info->fs_root had not been initialized yet,
> so NULL pointer passed to btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size().

I don't think it's the right fix, the initialization sequence should
take care of such situations. The fs_tree must exist at the time we
reach the point where it crashed, the code expects it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html