RE: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix allocation size calculations in alloc_btrfs_bio

2015-02-22 Thread Zhao Lei
Hi, Chris Mason

* From: Chris Mason [mailto:c...@fb.com]
 Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:00 AM
 To: linux-btrfs; Zhao Lei; dste...@suse.cz
 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix allocation size calculations in alloc_btrfs_bio
 
 Since commit 8e5cfb55d3f (Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in btrfs_bio
 structure), the raid map array is allocated along with the btrfs bio in
 alloc_btrfs_bio.  The calculation used to decide how much we need to allocate
 was using the wrong parameter passed into the allocation function.
 
 The passed in real_stripes will be zero if a target replace operation is not
 currently running.  We want to use total_stripes instead.
 
Sorry, my bad.

Thanks
Zhaolei

 Signed-off-by: Chris Mason c...@fb.com
 Reported-by: Dave Sterba dste...@suse.cz
 
 ---
  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 9 -
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index cd4d131..8222f6f
 100644
 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
 +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
 @@ -4903,10 +4903,17 @@ static void sort_parity_stripes(struct btrfs_bio
 *bbio, int num_stripes)  static struct btrfs_bio *alloc_btrfs_bio(int
 total_stripes, int real_stripes)  {
   struct btrfs_bio *bbio = kzalloc(
 +  /* the size of the btrfs_bio */
   sizeof(struct btrfs_bio) +
 + /* plus the variable array for the stripes */
   sizeof(struct btrfs_bio_stripe) * (total_stripes) +
 + /* plus the variable array for the tgt dev */
   sizeof(int) * (real_stripes) +
 - sizeof(u64) * (real_stripes),
 + /*
 +  * plus the raid_map, which includes both the tgt dev
 +  * and the stripes
 +  */
 + sizeof(u64) * (total_stripes),
   GFP_NOFS);
   if (!bbio)
   return NULL;
 --
 1.8.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix allocation size calculations in alloc_btrfs_bio

2015-02-20 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
 Since commit 8e5cfb55d3f (Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in
 btrfs_bio structure), the raid map array is allocated along with the
 btrfs bio in alloc_btrfs_bio.  The calculation used to decide how much
 we need to allocate was using the wrong parameter passed into the
 allocation function.
 
 The passed in real_stripes will be zero if a target replace operation
 is not currently running.  We want to use total_stripes instead.
 
 Signed-off-by: Chris Mason c...@fb.com
 Reported-by: Dave Sterba dste...@suse.cz

Tested-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz

Current master + this patch with full slub_debug is now ok with
btrfs/023.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix allocation size calculations in alloc_btrfs_bio

2015-02-20 Thread Chris Mason

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:35 AM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:

 Since commit 8e5cfb55d3f (Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in
 btrfs_bio structure), the raid map array is allocated along with the
 btrfs bio in alloc_btrfs_bio.  The calculation used to decide how 
much

 we need to allocate was using the wrong parameter passed into the
 allocation function.

 The passed in real_stripes will be zero if a target replace 
operation

 is not currently running.  We want to use total_stripes instead.

 Signed-off-by: Chris Mason c...@fb.com
 Reported-by: Dave Sterba dste...@suse.cz


Tested-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz

Current master + this patch with full slub_debug is now ok with
btrfs/023.


Thanks Dave.  It also survived all night with raid6 and stress.sh.  I'm 
sending to Linus today.


-chris



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] Btrfs: fix allocation size calculations in alloc_btrfs_bio

2015-02-19 Thread Chris Mason
Since commit 8e5cfb55d3f (Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in
btrfs_bio structure), the raid map array is allocated along with the
btrfs bio in alloc_btrfs_bio.  The calculation used to decide how much
we need to allocate was using the wrong parameter passed into the
allocation function.

The passed in real_stripes will be zero if a target replace operation
is not currently running.  We want to use total_stripes instead.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason c...@fb.com
Reported-by: Dave Sterba dste...@suse.cz

---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 9 -
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index cd4d131..8222f6f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4903,10 +4903,17 @@ static void sort_parity_stripes(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, 
int num_stripes)
 static struct btrfs_bio *alloc_btrfs_bio(int total_stripes, int real_stripes)
 {
struct btrfs_bio *bbio = kzalloc(
+/* the size of the btrfs_bio */
sizeof(struct btrfs_bio) +
+   /* plus the variable array for the stripes */
sizeof(struct btrfs_bio_stripe) * (total_stripes) +
+   /* plus the variable array for the tgt dev */
sizeof(int) * (real_stripes) +
-   sizeof(u64) * (real_stripes),
+   /*
+* plus the raid_map, which includes both the tgt dev
+* and the stripes
+*/
+   sizeof(u64) * (total_stripes),
GFP_NOFS);
if (!bbio)
return NULL;
-- 
1.8.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html