Re: [PATCH] btrfs: adjust order of unlocks in do_trimming()
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:21:12AM +0800, Su Yue wrote: > In function do_trimming(), block_group->lock should be unlocked first. Please also write why this is correct and if there are any bad consequences of the current behaviour. Thanks.
Re: [PATCH] btrfs: adjust order of unlocks in do_trimming()
On 28.11.18 г. 5:21 ч., Su Yue wrote: > In function do_trimming(), block_group->lock should be unlocked first. > > Fixes: 7fe1e6415026 ("Btrfs: rewrite btrfs_trim_block_group()") > Signed-off-by: Su Yue Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov > --- > fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c > index 4ba0aedc878b..3731fa92df56 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c > @@ -3149,8 +3149,8 @@ static int do_trimming(struct btrfs_block_group_cache > *block_group, > space_info->bytes_readonly += reserved_bytes; > block_group->reserved -= reserved_bytes; > space_info->bytes_reserved -= reserved_bytes; > - spin_unlock(_info->lock); > spin_unlock(_group->lock); > + spin_unlock(_info->lock); > } > > return ret; >
[PATCH] btrfs: adjust order of unlocks in do_trimming()
In function do_trimming(), block_group->lock should be unlocked first. Fixes: 7fe1e6415026 ("Btrfs: rewrite btrfs_trim_block_group()") Signed-off-by: Su Yue --- fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c index 4ba0aedc878b..3731fa92df56 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c @@ -3149,8 +3149,8 @@ static int do_trimming(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, space_info->bytes_readonly += reserved_bytes; block_group->reserved -= reserved_bytes; space_info->bytes_reserved -= reserved_bytes; - spin_unlock(_info->lock); spin_unlock(_group->lock); + spin_unlock(_info->lock); } return ret; -- 2.19.1