Re: [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: scrub: add memalloc_nofs protection around init_ipath
On 06/01/17 01:49, David Sterba wrote: init_ipath is called from a safe ioctl context and from scrub when printing an error. The protection is added for three reasons: * init_data_container calls vmalloc and this does not work as expected in the GFP_NOFS context, so this silently does GFP_KERNEL and might deadlock in some cases * keep the context constraint of GFP_NOFS, used by scrub * we want to use GFP_KERNEL unconditionally inside init_ipath or its callees Reviewed-by: Anand JainThanks, Anand Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index e99be644b19f..096e503e3ddc 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include "ctree.h" #include "volumes.h" #include "disk-io.h" @@ -733,6 +734,7 @@ static int scrub_print_warning_inode(u64 inum, u64 offset, u64 root, u32 nlink; int ret; int i; + unsigned nofs_flag; struct extent_buffer *eb; struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item; struct scrub_warning *swarn = warn_ctx; @@ -771,7 +773,14 @@ static int scrub_print_warning_inode(u64 inum, u64 offset, u64 root, nlink = btrfs_inode_nlink(eb, inode_item); btrfs_release_path(swarn->path); + /* +* init_path might indirectly call vmalloc, or use GFP_KERNEL. Scrub +* uses GFP_NOFS in this context, so we keep it consistent but it does +* not seem to be strictly necessary. +*/ + nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save(); ipath = init_ipath(4096, local_root, swarn->path); + memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag); if (IS_ERR(ipath)) { ret = PTR_ERR(ipath); ipath = NULL; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH 3/5] btrfs: scrub: add memalloc_nofs protection around init_ipath
init_ipath is called from a safe ioctl context and from scrub when printing an error. The protection is added for three reasons: * init_data_container calls vmalloc and this does not work as expected in the GFP_NOFS context, so this silently does GFP_KERNEL and might deadlock in some cases * keep the context constraint of GFP_NOFS, used by scrub * we want to use GFP_KERNEL unconditionally inside init_ipath or its callees Signed-off-by: David Sterba--- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index e99be644b19f..096e503e3ddc 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include "ctree.h" #include "volumes.h" #include "disk-io.h" @@ -733,6 +734,7 @@ static int scrub_print_warning_inode(u64 inum, u64 offset, u64 root, u32 nlink; int ret; int i; + unsigned nofs_flag; struct extent_buffer *eb; struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item; struct scrub_warning *swarn = warn_ctx; @@ -771,7 +773,14 @@ static int scrub_print_warning_inode(u64 inum, u64 offset, u64 root, nlink = btrfs_inode_nlink(eb, inode_item); btrfs_release_path(swarn->path); + /* +* init_path might indirectly call vmalloc, or use GFP_KERNEL. Scrub +* uses GFP_NOFS in this context, so we keep it consistent but it does +* not seem to be strictly necessary. +*/ + nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save(); ipath = init_ipath(4096, local_root, swarn->path); + memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag); if (IS_ERR(ipath)) { ret = PTR_ERR(ipath); ipath = NULL; -- 2.12.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html