Re: [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: cleanup extent_op handling
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 21.11.18 г. 20:59 ч., Josef Bacik wrote: > > From: Josef Bacik > > > > The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it > > needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to > > run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to > > cleanup_extent_op so it can be used by check_ref_cleanup() in order to > > unify the extent op handling. > > The whole name extent_op is actually a misnomer since AFAIR this is some > sort of modification of the references of metadata nodes. I don't see > why it can't be made as yet another type of reference which is run for a > given node. > It would change the key for a metadata extent reference for non-skinny metadata, and it sets the FULL_BACKREF flag. Since it really only changes flags now we could probably roll that into it's own thing, but that's out of scope for this stuff. Thanks, Josef
Re: [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: cleanup extent_op handling
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:59:09PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > From: Josef Bacik > > The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it > needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to > run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to > cleanup_extent_op so it can be used by check_ref_cleanup() in order to > unify the extent op handling. > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik > --- > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 36 +++- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > index e3ed3507018d..8a776dc9cb38 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > @@ -2424,19 +2424,33 @@ static void unselect_delayed_ref_head(struct > btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_ref > btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(head); > } > > -static int cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > - struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) > +static struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op * > +cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > + struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) Please keep the type and function name on one line, if the arguments would overflow, then move it on the next line and un-indent as necessary. I fix such things when merging, no need to resend. > { > struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = head->extent_op; > - int ret; > > if (!extent_op) > - return 0; > - head->extent_op = NULL; > + return NULL; > + > if (head->must_insert_reserved) { > + head->extent_op = NULL; > btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op); > - return 0; > + return NULL; > } > + return extent_op; > +} > + > +static int run_and_cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > + struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) > +{ > + struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = > + cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); I prefer to do non-trivial initializations in the statement block, it's easy to overlook that in among the declarations. Simple variable init, pointer dereferenes or using simple helpers is fine but cleanup_extent_op does not seem to fit to that. It's in other patches too so I can update that unless there are other things that would need a resend.
Re: [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: cleanup extent_op handling
On 21.11.18 г. 20:59 ч., Josef Bacik wrote: > From: Josef Bacik > > The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it > needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to > run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to > cleanup_extent_op so it can be used by check_ref_cleanup() in order to > unify the extent op handling. The whole name extent_op is actually a misnomer since AFAIR this is some sort of modification of the references of metadata nodes. I don't see why it can't be made as yet another type of reference which is run for a given node. > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik > --- > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 36 +++- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > index e3ed3507018d..8a776dc9cb38 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > @@ -2424,19 +2424,33 @@ static void unselect_delayed_ref_head(struct > btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_ref > btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(head); > } > > -static int cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > - struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) > +static struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op * > +cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > + struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) > { > struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = head->extent_op; > - int ret; > > if (!extent_op) > - return 0; > - head->extent_op = NULL; > + return NULL; > + > if (head->must_insert_reserved) { > + head->extent_op = NULL; > btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op); > - return 0; > + return NULL; > } > + return extent_op; > +} > + > +static int run_and_cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > + struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) > +{ > + struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = > + cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); > + int ret; > + > + if (!extent_op) > + return 0; > + head->extent_op = NULL; > spin_unlock(&head->lock); > ret = run_delayed_extent_op(trans, head, extent_op); > btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op); > @@ -2488,7 +2502,7 @@ static int cleanup_ref_head(struct btrfs_trans_handle > *trans, > > delayed_refs = &trans->transaction->delayed_refs; > > - ret = cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); > + ret = run_and_cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); > if (ret < 0) { > unselect_delayed_ref_head(delayed_refs, head); > btrfs_debug(fs_info, "run_delayed_extent_op returned %d", ret); > @@ -6977,12 +6991,8 @@ static noinline int check_ref_cleanup(struct > btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&head->ref_tree.rb_root)) > goto out; > > - if (head->extent_op) { > - if (!head->must_insert_reserved) > - goto out; > - btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(head->extent_op); > - head->extent_op = NULL; > - } > + if (cleanup_extent_op(trans, head) != NULL) > + goto out; > > /* >* waiting for the lock here would deadlock. If someone else has it >
Re: [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: cleanup extent_op handling
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:59:09PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: >From: Josef Bacik > >The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it >needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to >run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to >cleanup_extent_op so it can be used by check_ref_cleanup() in order to >unify the extent op handling. > >Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik One nitpick below. Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi >--- > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 36 +++- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c >index e3ed3507018d..8a776dc9cb38 100644 >--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c >+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c >@@ -2424,19 +2424,33 @@ static void unselect_delayed_ref_head(struct >btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_ref > btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(head); > } > >-static int cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >- struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) >+static struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op * >+cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, The trans parameter seems useless. -- Thanks, Lu >+struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) > { > struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = head->extent_op; >- int ret; > > if (!extent_op) >- return 0; >- head->extent_op = NULL; >+ return NULL; >+ > if (head->must_insert_reserved) { >+ head->extent_op = NULL; > btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op); >- return 0; >+ return NULL; > } >+ return extent_op; >+} >+ >+static int run_and_cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, >+ struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) >+{ >+ struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = >+ cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); >+ int ret; >+ >+ if (!extent_op) >+ return 0; >+ head->extent_op = NULL; > spin_unlock(&head->lock); > ret = run_delayed_extent_op(trans, head, extent_op); > btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op); >@@ -2488,7 +2502,7 @@ static int cleanup_ref_head(struct btrfs_trans_handle >*trans, > > delayed_refs = &trans->transaction->delayed_refs; > >- ret = cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); >+ ret = run_and_cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); > if (ret < 0) { > unselect_delayed_ref_head(delayed_refs, head); > btrfs_debug(fs_info, "run_delayed_extent_op returned %d", ret); >@@ -6977,12 +6991,8 @@ static noinline int check_ref_cleanup(struct >btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&head->ref_tree.rb_root)) > goto out; > >- if (head->extent_op) { >- if (!head->must_insert_reserved) >- goto out; >- btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(head->extent_op); >- head->extent_op = NULL; >- } >+ if (cleanup_extent_op(trans, head) != NULL) >+ goto out; > > /* >* waiting for the lock here would deadlock. If someone else has it >-- >2.14.3 > > >
[PATCH 3/6] btrfs: cleanup extent_op handling
From: Josef Bacik The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to cleanup_extent_op so it can be used by check_ref_cleanup() in order to unify the extent op handling. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 36 +++- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index e3ed3507018d..8a776dc9cb38 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -2424,19 +2424,33 @@ static void unselect_delayed_ref_head(struct btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_ref btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(head); } -static int cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, -struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) +static struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op * +cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, + struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) { struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = head->extent_op; - int ret; if (!extent_op) - return 0; - head->extent_op = NULL; + return NULL; + if (head->must_insert_reserved) { + head->extent_op = NULL; btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op); - return 0; + return NULL; } + return extent_op; +} + +static int run_and_cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, +struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) +{ + struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = + cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); + int ret; + + if (!extent_op) + return 0; + head->extent_op = NULL; spin_unlock(&head->lock); ret = run_delayed_extent_op(trans, head, extent_op); btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op); @@ -2488,7 +2502,7 @@ static int cleanup_ref_head(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, delayed_refs = &trans->transaction->delayed_refs; - ret = cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); + ret = run_and_cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); if (ret < 0) { unselect_delayed_ref_head(delayed_refs, head); btrfs_debug(fs_info, "run_delayed_extent_op returned %d", ret); @@ -6977,12 +6991,8 @@ static noinline int check_ref_cleanup(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&head->ref_tree.rb_root)) goto out; - if (head->extent_op) { - if (!head->must_insert_reserved) - goto out; - btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(head->extent_op); - head->extent_op = NULL; - } + if (cleanup_extent_op(trans, head) != NULL) + goto out; /* * waiting for the lock here would deadlock. If someone else has it -- 2.14.3