Re: Fix: btrfsctl arguments handling
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 22:02 +0300, Ahmed Kamal wrote:
> Is this not a valid patch/fix ? Who do I have to bug to get this merged :)
>
It looks fine, I'll queue it up.
Thanks,
Chris
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Ahmed Kamal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's probably a more proper patch
> >
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # Signed-Off-By: Ahmed Kamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > # Date 1216410189 -10800
> > # Node ID f35e2b3b25a97d42452ec90b6c524721d9c9941f
> > # Parent 1aa4b32e3efd452531cb0b883edfcc3761487fca
> > Fixing btrfsctl argument handling
> >
> > diff -r 1aa4b32e3efd -r f35e2b3b25a9 btrfsctl.c
> > --- a/btrfsctl.cTue Jun 10 10:09:18 2008 -0400
> > +++ b/btrfsctl.cFri Jul 18 22:43:09 2008 +0300
> > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
> >btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
> >exit(0);
> >}
> > - for (i = 1; i < ac - 1; i++) {
> > + for (i = 1; i <= ac - 1; i++) {
> >if (strcmp(av[i], "-s") == 0) {
> >if (i + 1 >= ac - 1) {
> >fprintf(stderr, "-s requires an arg");
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Ahmed Kamal
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > btrfsctl -A
> > > in the current -unstable branch, does not result in the error message
> > > designated for it, namely "-A requires an arg\n". Turns out the whole
> > > loop was being skipped!
> > > Please find a patch attached that fixed it for me.
> > >
> > > diff -r 1aa4b32e3efd btrfsctl.c
> > > --- a/btrfsctl.cTue Jun 10 10:09:18 2008 -0400
> > > +++ b/btrfsctl.cFri Jul 18 22:34:46 2008 +0300
> > > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
> > >btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
> > >exit(0);
> > >}
> > > - for (i = 1; i < ac - 1; i++) {
> > > + for (i = 1; i <= ac - 1; i++) {
> > >if (strcmp(av[i], "-s") == 0) {
> > >if (i + 1 >= ac - 1) {
> > >fprintf(stderr, "-s requires an arg");
> > >
> > >
> > > PS: Is this the correct way to submit patches ?
> > >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Fix: btrfsctl arguments handling
Is this not a valid patch/fix ? Who do I have to bug to get this merged :)
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Ahmed Kamal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's probably a more proper patch
>
> # HG changeset patch
> # Signed-Off-By: Ahmed Kamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # Date 1216410189 -10800
> # Node ID f35e2b3b25a97d42452ec90b6c524721d9c9941f
> # Parent 1aa4b32e3efd452531cb0b883edfcc3761487fca
> Fixing btrfsctl argument handling
>
> diff -r 1aa4b32e3efd -r f35e2b3b25a9 btrfsctl.c
> --- a/btrfsctl.cTue Jun 10 10:09:18 2008 -0400
> +++ b/btrfsctl.cFri Jul 18 22:43:09 2008 +0300
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
>btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
>exit(0);
>}
> - for (i = 1; i < ac - 1; i++) {
> + for (i = 1; i <= ac - 1; i++) {
>if (strcmp(av[i], "-s") == 0) {
>if (i + 1 >= ac - 1) {
>fprintf(stderr, "-s requires an arg");
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Ahmed Kamal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > btrfsctl -A
> > in the current -unstable branch, does not result in the error message
> > designated for it, namely "-A requires an arg\n". Turns out the whole
> > loop was being skipped!
> > Please find a patch attached that fixed it for me.
> >
> > diff -r 1aa4b32e3efd btrfsctl.c
> > --- a/btrfsctl.cTue Jun 10 10:09:18 2008 -0400
> > +++ b/btrfsctl.cFri Jul 18 22:34:46 2008 +0300
> > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
> >btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
> >exit(0);
> >}
> > - for (i = 1; i < ac - 1; i++) {
> > + for (i = 1; i <= ac - 1; i++) {
> >if (strcmp(av[i], "-s") == 0) {
> >if (i + 1 >= ac - 1) {
> >fprintf(stderr, "-s requires an arg");
> >
> >
> > PS: Is this the correct way to submit patches ?
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Fix: btrfsctl arguments handling
That's probably a more proper patch
# HG changeset patch
# User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Date 1216410189 -10800
# Node ID f35e2b3b25a97d42452ec90b6c524721d9c9941f
# Parent 1aa4b32e3efd452531cb0b883edfcc3761487fca
Fixing btrfsctl argument handling
diff -r 1aa4b32e3efd -r f35e2b3b25a9 btrfsctl.c
--- a/btrfsctl.cTue Jun 10 10:09:18 2008 -0400
+++ b/btrfsctl.cFri Jul 18 22:43:09 2008 +0300
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
exit(0);
}
- for (i = 1; i < ac - 1; i++) {
+ for (i = 1; i <= ac - 1; i++) {
if (strcmp(av[i], "-s") == 0) {
if (i + 1 >= ac - 1) {
fprintf(stderr, "-s requires an arg");
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Ahmed Kamal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> btrfsctl -A
> in the current -unstable branch, does not result in the error message
> designated for it, namely "-A requires an arg\n". Turns out the whole
> loop was being skipped!
> Please find a patch attached that fixed it for me.
>
> diff -r 1aa4b32e3efd btrfsctl.c
> --- a/btrfsctl.cTue Jun 10 10:09:18 2008 -0400
> +++ b/btrfsctl.cFri Jul 18 22:34:46 2008 +0300
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
>btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
>exit(0);
>}
> - for (i = 1; i < ac - 1; i++) {
> + for (i = 1; i <= ac - 1; i++) {
>if (strcmp(av[i], "-s") == 0) {
>if (i + 1 >= ac - 1) {
>fprintf(stderr, "-s requires an arg");
>
>
> PS: Is this the correct way to submit patches ?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Fix: btrfsctl arguments handling
Hi,
btrfsctl -A
in the current -unstable branch, does not result in the error message
designated for it, namely "-A requires an arg\n". Turns out the whole
loop was being skipped!
Please find a patch attached that fixed it for me.
diff -r 1aa4b32e3efd btrfsctl.c
--- a/btrfsctl.cTue Jun 10 10:09:18 2008 -0400
+++ b/btrfsctl.cFri Jul 18 22:34:46 2008 +0300
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
exit(0);
}
- for (i = 1; i < ac - 1; i++) {
+ for (i = 1; i <= ac - 1; i++) {
if (strcmp(av[i], "-s") == 0) {
if (i + 1 >= ac - 1) {
fprintf(stderr, "-s requires an arg");
PS: Is this the correct way to submit patches ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
