Hello,
On 2014-08-19 21:23, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Dienstag, 19. August 2014, 10:17:36 schrieb Jussi Kivilinna:
Hi Jussi,
Hello,
On 2014-08-17 18:55, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Hi,
during playing around with the kernel crypto API, I implemented a
performance measurement tool kit for the various kernel crypto API cipher
types. The cryptoperf tool kit is provided in [1].
Comments are welcome.
Your results are quite slow compared to, for example cryptsetup
benchmark, which uses kernel crypto from userspace.
With Intel i5-2450M (turbo enabled), I get:
# Algorithm | Key | Encryption | Decryption
aes-cbc 128b 524,0 MiB/s 11909,1 MiB/s
serpent-cbc 128b60,9 MiB/s 219,4 MiB/s
twofish-cbc 128b 143,4 MiB/s 240,3 MiB/s
aes-cbc 256b 330,4 MiB/s 1242,8 MiB/s
serpent-cbc 256b66,1 MiB/s 220,3 MiB/s
twofish-cbc 256b 143,5 MiB/s 221,8 MiB/s
aes-xts 256b 1268,7 MiB/s 4193,0 MiB/s
serpent-xts 256b 234,8 MiB/s 224,6 MiB/s
twofish-xts 256b 253,5 MiB/s 254,7 MiB/s
aes-xts 512b 2535,0 MiB/s 2945,0 MiB/s
serpent-xts 512b 274,2 MiB/s 242,3 MiB/s
twofish-xts 512b 250,0 MiB/s 245,8 MiB/s
One to four GB per second for XTS? 12 GB per second for AES CBC? Somehow that
does not sound right.
Agreed, those do not look correct... I wonder what happened there. On
new run, I got more sane results:
# Algorithm | Key | Encryption | Decryption
aes-cbc 128b 139,1 MiB/s 1713,6 MiB/s
serpent-cbc 128b62,2 MiB/s 232,9 MiB/s
twofish-cbc 128b 116,3 MiB/s 243,7 MiB/s
aes-cbc 256b 375,1 MiB/s 1159,4 MiB/s
serpent-cbc 256b62,1 MiB/s 214,9 MiB/s
twofish-cbc 256b 139,3 MiB/s 217,5 MiB/s
aes-xts 256b 1296,4 MiB/s 1272,5 MiB/s
serpent-xts 256b 283,3 MiB/s 275,6 MiB/s
twofish-xts 256b 294,8 MiB/s 299,3 MiB/s
aes-xts 512b 984,3 MiB/s 991,1 MiB/s
serpent-xts 512b 227,7 MiB/s 220,6 MiB/s
twofish-xts 512b 220,6 MiB/s 220,2 MiB/s
-Jussi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html