Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/3 v2] f2fs: clear writeback when compression failed
On 2024/4/17 0:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: Let's stop issuing compressed writes and clear their writeback flags. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address
On 2024/4/25 1:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is
not the corruption case.
Cc: # v6.9+
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr")
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
Thanks,
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm: Remove page_mapping()
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 04:34:23PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > For some reason, > > mm/hugetlb.c: In function 'hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write': > mm/hugetlb.c:2164:41: error: implicit declaration of function 'page_mapping'; > did you mean 'page_mapped'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 2164 | struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(hpage); > | ^~~~ > | page_mapped > mm/hugetlb.c:2164:41: error: initialization of 'struct address_space *' from > 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion] > > > I'll disable "mm: Remove page_mapping()" pending review of the below, > please. Looks pretty similar to https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240412193510.2356957-7-wi...@infradead.org/ Sorry, I thought you'd picked up that series; I think it's fully reviewed by now?
Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm: Remove page_mapping()
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:55:32 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 24.04.24 00:55, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > All callers are now converted, delete this compatibility wrapper.
> >
For some reason,
mm/hugetlb.c: In function 'hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write':
mm/hugetlb.c:2164:41: error: implicit declaration of function 'page_mapping';
did you mean 'page_mapped'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2164 | struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(hpage);
| ^~~~
| page_mapped
mm/hugetlb.c:2164:41: error: initialization of 'struct address_space *' from
'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
I'll disable "mm: Remove page_mapping()" pending review of the below,
please.
From: Andrew Morton
Subject: mm: convert hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write() to
hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write
Date: Wed Apr 24 04:20:30 PM PDT 2024
Convert this to use folios, so we can remove page_mapping()
Cc: David Hildenbrand
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)"
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
---
include/linux/hugetlb.h |6 +++---
mm/hugetlb.c|6 +++---
mm/memory-failure.c |4 ++--
mm/migrate.c|2 +-
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-convert-hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write-to-hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2155,13 +2155,13 @@ static bool prep_compound_gigantic_folio
/*
* Find and lock address space (mapping) in write mode.
*
- * Upon entry, the page is locked which means that page_mapping() is
+ * Upon entry, the folio is locked which means that folio_mapping() is
* stable. Due to locking order, we can only trylock_write. If we can
* not get the lock, simply return NULL to caller.
*/
-struct address_space *hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write(struct page *hpage)
+struct address_space *hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write(struct folio *folio)
{
- struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(hpage);
+ struct address_space *mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
if (!mapping)
return mapping;
---
a/mm/memory-failure.c~mm-convert-hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write-to-hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write
+++ a/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struc
* XXX: the dirty test could be racy: set_page_dirty() may not always
* be called inside page lock (it's recommended but not enforced).
*/
- mapping = page_mapping(hpage);
+ mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
if (!(flags & MF_MUST_KILL) && !PageDirty(hpage) && mapping &&
mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) {
if (page_mkclean(hpage)) {
@@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struc
* TTU_RMAP_LOCKED to indicate we have taken the lock
* at this higher level.
*/
- mapping = hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write(hpage);
+ mapping = hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write(folio);
if (mapping) {
try_to_unmap(folio, ttu|TTU_RMAP_LOCKED);
i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
---
a/include/linux/hugetlb.h~mm-convert-hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write-to-hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write
+++ a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ bool hugetlbfs_pagecache_present(struct
struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long address);
-struct address_space *hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write(struct page *hpage);
+struct address_space *hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write(struct folio *folio);
extern int sysctl_hugetlb_shm_group;
extern struct list_head huge_boot_pages[MAX_NUMNODES];
@@ -297,8 +297,8 @@ static inline unsigned long hugetlb_tota
return 0;
}
-static inline struct address_space *hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write(
- struct page *hpage)
+static inline struct address_space *hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write(
+ struct folio *folio)
{
return NULL;
}
---
a/mm/migrate.c~mm-convert-hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write-to-hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write
+++ a/mm/migrate.c
@@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move_huge_page(new_
* semaphore in write mode here and set TTU_RMAP_LOCKED
* to let lower levels know we have taken the lock.
*/
- mapping = hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write(>page);
+ mapping = hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write(src);
if (unlikely(!mapping))
goto unlock_put_anon;
_
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: use folio_test_writeback
Hello: This series was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev) by Jaegeuk Kim : On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 20:34:09 + you wrote: > Let's convert PageWriteback to folio_test_writeback. > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > --- > fs/f2fs/compress.c | 2 +- > fs/f2fs/data.c | 3 +-- > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +- > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 2 +- > fs/f2fs/inline.c | 2 +- > fs/f2fs/inode.c| 3 ++- > fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 +- > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 10 +- > 8 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) Here is the summary with links: - [f2fs-dev,1/3] f2fs: use folio_test_writeback (no matching commit) - [f2fs-dev,2/3] f2fs: clear writeback when compression failed (no matching commit) - [f2fs-dev,3/3] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/04890641bf1f You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] Patchwork summary for: f2fs
Hello: The following patches were marked "accepted", because they were applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev): Series: [f2fs-dev,1/3] f2fs: use folio_test_writeback Submitter: Jaegeuk Kim Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/f2fs/list/?series=842987 Lore link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409203411.1885121-1-jaeg...@kernel.org Patches: [f2fs-dev,1/3] f2fs: use folio_test_writeback [f2fs-dev,3/3] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address Total patches: 2 -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address
f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is
not the corruption case.
Cc: # v6.9+
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr")
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index 5d05a413f451..55d444bec5c0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info
*sbi,
break;
case META_SIT:
if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi)))
- goto err;
+ goto check_only;
break;
case META_SSA:
if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr))
- goto err;
+ goto check_only;
break;
case META_CP:
if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr ||
blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi)))
- goto err;
+ goto check_only;
break;
case META_POR:
if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi)))
- goto err;
+ goto check_only;
break;
case DATA_GENERIC:
case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE:
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info
*sbi,
return true;
err:
f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR);
+check_only:
return false;
}
--
2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
___
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [Bug 218770] fsck seems unable to solve corruption
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jaeg...@kernel.org --- Comment #6 from Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) --- Thank you for the report. It seems I need to reapply that patch indeed. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Re: [f2fs-dev] [Bug 218770] fsck seems unable to solve corruption
On 4/24/24 14:42, guido iodice wrote: Thank you. For clarity, can you confirm that this is a false alarm and in fact there should be no corruption? I'm not a developer, but my computer runs just fine with this patch applied since a week or so. I didn't notice any data corruption or error messages in the log. Best Guido Iodice Il giorno mer 24 apr 2024 alle ore 14:40 Tor Vic ha scritto: On 4/24/24 14:30, bugzilla-dae...@kernel.org wrote: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 --- Comment #5 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #4) On 4/24/24 12:21 PM, Tor Vic wrote: I can confirm the constant fsck issue, and it was fixed in my case by the following patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20240409203411.1885121-3-jaeg...@kernel.org/ I have 6.9.rc5 (dated 2024-04-21 on kernel.org) Is that patch already applied to it? If yes, it doesn't solve the bug. No, not applied yet. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Re: [f2fs-dev] [Bug 218770] fsck seems unable to solve corruption
On 4/24/24 14:30, bugzilla-dae...@kernel.org wrote: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 --- Comment #5 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #4) On 4/24/24 12:21 PM, Tor Vic wrote: I can confirm the constant fsck issue, and it was fixed in my case by the following patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20240409203411.1885121-3-jaeg...@kernel.org/ I have 6.9.rc5 (dated 2024-04-21 on kernel.org) Is that patch already applied to it? If yes, it doesn't solve the bug. No, not applied yet. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [Bug 218770] fsck seems unable to solve corruption
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 --- Comment #5 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #4) > On 4/24/24 12:21 PM, Tor Vic wrote: > > > > I can confirm the constant fsck issue, and it was fixed in my case by > > the following patch: > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20240409203411.1885121-3-jaeg...@kernel.org/ I have 6.9.rc5 (dated 2024-04-21 on kernel.org) Is that patch already applied to it? If yes, it doesn't solve the bug. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [Bug 218770] fsck seems unable to solve corruption
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|ANSWERED|CODE_FIX Regression|No |Yes --- Comment #4 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) --- On 4/24/24 12:21 PM, Tor Vic wrote: > > I can confirm the constant fsck issue, and it was fixed in my case by > the following patch: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20240409203411.1885121-3-jaeg...@kernel.org/ -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [Bug 218770] fsck seems unable to solve corruption
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |ANSWERED --- Comment #3 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) --- > Even running fsck several times always finds problems. This looks like a f2fs fsck issue, not the kernel issue. Please post here: https://github.com/jaegeuk/f2fs-tools -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Re: [f2fs-dev] [Bug 218769] New: fsck seems unable to solve corruption
On 4/24/24 13:38, bugzilla-dae...@kernel.org wrote: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 Bug ID: 218769 Summary: fsck seems unable to solve corruption Product: File System Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: P3 Component: f2fs Assignee: filesystem_f...@kernel-bugs.kernel.org Reporter: guido.iod...@gmail.com Regression: No Created attachment 306204 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306204=edit fsck After installing kernel 6.9rc5 it seems that all my f2fs partitions are corrupted, according to fsck. On boot the check-repair is always performed. I also tried running f2fs from a live usb (with kernel 6.6) but the problem is not solved. Even running fsck several times always finds problems. I can confirm the constant fsck issue, and it was fixed in my case by the following patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20240409203411.1885121-3-jaeg...@kernel.org/ I attach the output of fsck -f -d 1 on one of the partitions. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [Bug 218770] fsck seems unable to solve corruption
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 --- Comment #2 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) --- *** Bug 218769 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [Bug 218769] fsck seems unable to solve corruption
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 218770 *** -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm: Remove page_mapping()
On 24.04.24 00:55, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
All callers are now converted, delete this compatibility wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
---
include/linux/pagemap.h | 1 -
mm/folio-compat.c | 6 --
2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index b6f14e9a2d98..941f7ed714b9 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ static inline void filemap_nr_thps_dec(struct address_space
*mapping)
#endif
}
-struct address_space *page_mapping(struct page *);
struct address_space *folio_mapping(struct folio *);
struct address_space *swapcache_mapping(struct folio *);
diff --git a/mm/folio-compat.c b/mm/folio-compat.c
index f31e0ce65b11..f05906006b3c 100644
--- a/mm/folio-compat.c
+++ b/mm/folio-compat.c
@@ -10,12 +10,6 @@
#include
#include "internal.h"
-struct address_space *page_mapping(struct page *page)
-{
- return folio_mapping(page_folio(page));
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_mapping);
-
void unlock_page(struct page *page)
{
return folio_unlock(page_folio(page));
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Re: [PATCH 5/6] userfault; Expand folio use in mfill_atomic_install_pte()
On 24.04.24 00:55, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: Call page_folio() a little earlier so we can use folio_mapping() instead of page_mapping(), saving a call to compound_head(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) --- Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
Re: [PATCH 4/6] migrate: Expand the use of folio in __migrate_device_pages()
On 24.04.24 00:55, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: Removes a few calls to compound_head() and a call to page_mapping(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) --- Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
Re: [PATCH 3/6] memory-failure: Remove calls to page_mapping()
On 24.04.24 00:55, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: This is mostly just inlining page_mapping() into the two callers. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) --- Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
Re: [PATCH 2/6] f2fs: Convert f2fs_clear_page_cache_dirty_tag to use a folio
On 24.04.24 00:55, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
Removes uses of page_mapping() and page_index().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 5d641fac02ba..9f74c867d790 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -4100,11 +4100,12 @@ const struct address_space_operations f2fs_dblock_aops
= {
void f2fs_clear_page_cache_dirty_tag(struct page *page)
{
- struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
+ struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
+ struct address_space *mapping = folio->mapping;
unsigned long flags;
xa_lock_irqsave(>i_pages, flags);
- __xa_clear_mark(>i_pages, page_index(page),
+ __xa_clear_mark(>i_pages, folio->index,
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
xa_unlock_irqrestore(>i_pages, flags);
}
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Re: [PATCH 1/6] fscrypt: Convert bh_get_inode_and_lblk_num to use a folio
On 24.04.24 00:55, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: Remove uses of page->index, page_mapping() and b_page. Saves a call to compound_head(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) --- Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
[f2fs-dev] [Bug 218770] fsck seems unable to solve corruption
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 --- Comment #1 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306205 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306205=edit fsck -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [Bug 218770] New: fsck seems unable to solve corruption
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770 Bug ID: 218770 Summary: fsck seems unable to solve corruption Product: File System Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: P3 Component: f2fs Assignee: filesystem_f...@kernel-bugs.kernel.org Reporter: guido.iod...@gmail.com Regression: No After installing kernel 6.9rc5 it seems that all my f2fs partitions are corrupted, according to fsck. On boot the check-repair is always performed. I also tried running f2fs from a live usb (with kernel 6.6) but the problem is not solved. Even running fsck several times always finds problems. I attach the output of fsck -f -d 1 on one of the partitions. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [Bug 218769] New: fsck seems unable to solve corruption
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 Bug ID: 218769 Summary: fsck seems unable to solve corruption Product: File System Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: P3 Component: f2fs Assignee: filesystem_f...@kernel-bugs.kernel.org Reporter: guido.iod...@gmail.com Regression: No Created attachment 306204 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306204=edit fsck After installing kernel 6.9rc5 it seems that all my f2fs partitions are corrupted, according to fsck. On boot the check-repair is always performed. I also tried running f2fs from a live usb (with kernel 6.6) but the problem is not solved. Even running fsck several times always finds problems. I attach the output of fsck -f -d 1 on one of the partitions. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
