Re: [patch 0/4] 64k pagesize/blocksize fixes

2007-09-26 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 16:30 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
 Attached the fixes necessary to support 64k pagesize/blocksize. I think these 
 are useful
 independent of the large blocksize patchset since there are architectures 
 that support
 64k page size and that could use these large buffer sizes without the large 
 buffersize
 patchset.
 
 Are these patches in the right shape to be merged? I rediffed these against 
 2.6.32-rc8-mm1.
 
 I had to fix some things in the second patch (ext2) that may need some review 
 since the
 way that commits work changed.
 

Thanks,  As Andreas mentioned in another email there is a better way to
deal with rec_len issue on 64k block size. I will get those patches
merged in ext4 patch queue. I think the updated patches could get
merged.


Mingming

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fsdevel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[patch 0/4] 64k pagesize/blocksize fixes

2007-09-25 Thread Christoph Lameter
Attached the fixes necessary to support 64k pagesize/blocksize. I think these 
are useful
independent of the large blocksize patchset since there are architectures that 
support
64k page size and that could use these large buffer sizes without the large 
buffersize
patchset.

Are these patches in the right shape to be merged? I rediffed these against 
2.6.32-rc8-mm1.

I had to fix some things in the second patch (ext2) that may need some review 
since the
way that commits work changed.

-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fsdevel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html