Re: please enlighten me [NB: Off-topic]

2006-03-25 Thread Amos Shapira
On 3/25/06, Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 To be fair to the US, as far as I understand, this was not about snort
 at all, but about other products made by the company and used by
 sensitive agencies of the US government. CheckPoint agreed to certain

I keep hearing that CheckPoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 are also used to protect
very sensitive American defense-related network assets. Also lots of other stuff
used by the American Governement (parts of the Windows OS, Motorola cell
phones, software and complete systems on F-15 fighter planes, and probably tons
of other stuff I don't know about or can't remember right now) is developed in
Israel so what's the special concern about SourceFire of all things?

--Amos

To unsubscribe, 
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: please enlighten me [NB: Off-topic]

2006-03-25 Thread Tzahi Fadida
I think it's the same attitude after 9/11 where they arrested
israeli tourists of the street and held them for a lengthy period
for no apparent reason.

History shows, if you don't know who your real friends are 
you won't survive as a super power for long. They've got
to get their priority straight and stop with the paranoia.

If there ever was a country outside the union that identified
more with the US, it's israel. If they want to mess it up and isolate
themselves completely, that's their problem.

Finally, I hope its not bigotry. The US has come a long way,
but remember that at the 40s and 50s
the US was still mostly racist towards jews, blacks, etc...
It was not so long ago.

Regards,
tzahi. 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amos Shapira
 Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 12:16 PM
 To: linux-il@linux.org.il
 Subject: Re: please enlighten me [NB: Off-topic]
 
 On 3/25/06, Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  To be fair to the US, as far as I understand, this was not 
 about snort
  at all, but about other products made by the company and used by
  sensitive agencies of the US government. CheckPoint agreed 
 to certain
 
 I keep hearing that CheckPoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 are also 
 used to protect
 very sensitive American defense-related network assets. Also 
 lots of other stuff
 used by the American Governement (parts of the Windows OS, 
 Motorola cell
 phones, software and complete systems on F-15 fighter planes, 
 and probably tons
 of other stuff I don't know about or can't remember right 
 now) is developed in
 Israel so what's the special concern about SourceFire of all things?
 
 --Amos
 
 ==
 To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
 echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: please enlighten me [NB: Off-topic]

2006-03-24 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This snort business was often compared to the sell of six major
 U.S. sea ports to a Dubai state-owned firm, which was approved w/o
 too much considerations. The same department is the one that forbade
 the Israeli Checkpoint from purchasing SourceFire, all this while
 the U.S. is in arms against almost all arab countries. Makes you
 wonder, doesn't it ?

Not really.

To be fair to the US, as far as I understand, this was not about snort
at all, but about other products made by the company and used by
sensitive agencies of the US government. CheckPoint agreed to certain
restrictions as a part of the deal but that was not enough, so they
backed out.

And as for DP World, that is not so simple, either. They got into that
mess almost accidentally, because they bought a British company called
PO that had been running several US port terminals for a long
time. DP World bought PO to get their Asian operations, actually, the
US part was not the focus.

IIRC the port deal was killed by the House Appropriations
Committee. It actually stands to reason that the same agency that
effectively got a serious slap on the wrist over the ports decided to
play it extra safe the next time around.

Oh, and while the US is not terribly friendly with some Arab countries
these days, I suspect the relations with Dubai (or UAE) are actually
quite good.

Americans do actually take these things seriously. You may sneer, but
I work for an American multinational, and there are detailed rules and
regulations and special offices and personnel dealing with the
question of what can or cannot be done outside of the US or with
involvement of foreigners (not American nationals), even within the
same company. This is with or without defense-related sensitivity,
just due to commercial export restrictions. They will not just look at
how American the company is, but who the particular people involved
are. I know of cases where very senior people central to a huge
project were denied entry to client facilities (where the product they
were developing was being installed) because they were not American
citizens.

By the way, if you suspect that these export restrictions are somehow
anti-Israeli, consider this: a part of these restrictions is an
absolute prohibition to do any business with any party that supports
boycott of Israel. It is the law. The law, of course, says boycott in
general, but there is an immediate explicit comment that the primary
concern is the boycott of Israel by Arab or other countries.

-- 
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.goldshmidt.org

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: please enlighten me [NB: Off-topic]

2006-03-24 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:

To be fair to the US, as far as I understand, this was not about snort
at all, but about other products made by the company and used by
sensitive agencies of the US government.

Well, that's not what every single quote I've seen to date states. It
states that their concern was over the fact that a lot of sensitive
agencies use *SNORT*.

‎This has nothing to do with the question of whether Check Point is
Israeli or Arab, or whether it is government owned or not. As far as I
can see it, it is Al-Quedia that could make the buy offer, and the US
government should not have had any reason to object. This is what Open
Source is all about.

  Shachar

-- 
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
Have you backed up today's work? http://www.lingnu.com/backup.html


=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]