On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 12:17, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
>
> On an operational note, as Dan handed off the branch to me for this cycle, we
> missed that the original few commits were inadvertently made on top of a few
> CXL commits that went in in the 6.4-rc cycle via the CXL tree.
>
> git-request-pull included these, and hence they appear in the shortlog and
> diffstat below, but the actual merge correctly identifies and skips over them.
> I kept it as it is to preserve the linux-next soak time, but if I should have
> done it differently, please let me know.
No, this was the right thing to do. Apart from a slightly odd choice
of base for this all, the pull looks perfectly normal.
Thanks,
Linus
