Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: Revert "Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()"

2016-02-24 Thread Олег Мороз

I've checked next next-20160218 tag and confirm that it works.

18.02.2016 19:03, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 08:13:41AM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:

On 17.02.2016 21:36, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

These are clean reverts of 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement
pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()") and related changes.

We have two reports of drivers broken in v4.3 by Jiang's change,
991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and
pcibios_free_irq()").

It would be best to fix the problem instead of reverting 991de2e59090, but
I don't have time to do that myself, and we haven't heard from Jiang, so
the only choice I have is to revert the commit.

Note that reverting will likely break IOAPIC hotplug.

Олег and Sunjin, can you please test this and see whether it fixes your
drivers?  This patch is based on v4.5-rc1.

I intend to merge these for v4.5 unless I hear objections.

They're on my for-linus branch, so they should appear in linux-next
tomorrow.

Changes from the v1 posting:
   - Explicitly revert related patches instead of resolving conflicts
 manually
---

Bjorn Helgaas (3):
   Revert "x86/PCI: Don't alloc pcibios-irq when MSI is enabled"
   Revert "PCI: Add helpers to manage pci_dev->irq and pci_dev->irq_managed"
   Revert "PCI, x86: Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()"


  arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h |2 ++
  arch/x86/pci/common.c  |   26 ++
  arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c   |9 +++--
  arch/x86/pci/irq.c |   23 +++
  drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c |   17 +
  include/linux/pci.h|   17 -
  6 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

As i undestand this patch will appear in kernel git repo tomorrow? I
don't need to apply in manyally to v4.5-rc1?

These are included in the next-20160218 tag in the linux-next git repo (not
Linus' repo) at:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git

You browse this at:

   https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/

If you'd rather, you can also apply the patches yourself to v4.5-rc1.

Bjorn




Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: Revert "Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()"

2016-02-24 Thread Олег Мороз

I've checked next next-20160218 tag and confirm that it works.

18.02.2016 19:03, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 08:13:41AM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:

On 17.02.2016 21:36, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

These are clean reverts of 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement
pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()") and related changes.

We have two reports of drivers broken in v4.3 by Jiang's change,
991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and
pcibios_free_irq()").

It would be best to fix the problem instead of reverting 991de2e59090, but
I don't have time to do that myself, and we haven't heard from Jiang, so
the only choice I have is to revert the commit.

Note that reverting will likely break IOAPIC hotplug.

Олег and Sunjin, can you please test this and see whether it fixes your
drivers?  This patch is based on v4.5-rc1.

I intend to merge these for v4.5 unless I hear objections.

They're on my for-linus branch, so they should appear in linux-next
tomorrow.

Changes from the v1 posting:
   - Explicitly revert related patches instead of resolving conflicts
 manually
---

Bjorn Helgaas (3):
   Revert "x86/PCI: Don't alloc pcibios-irq when MSI is enabled"
   Revert "PCI: Add helpers to manage pci_dev->irq and pci_dev->irq_managed"
   Revert "PCI, x86: Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()"


  arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h |2 ++
  arch/x86/pci/common.c  |   26 ++
  arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c   |9 +++--
  arch/x86/pci/irq.c |   23 +++
  drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c |   17 +
  include/linux/pci.h|   17 -
  6 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

As i undestand this patch will appear in kernel git repo tomorrow? I
don't need to apply in manyally to v4.5-rc1?

These are included in the next-20160218 tag in the linux-next git repo (not
Linus' repo) at:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git

You browse this at:

   https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/

If you'd rather, you can also apply the patches yourself to v4.5-rc1.

Bjorn




Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-02-02 Thread Олег Мороз
Ohhh. It's not my driver from scratch. I'm just trying to maintain it in 
working state.
Could you please advice me some correct and small and simple (I know I 
ask a lot) PCI driver as example. Maybe it will be not so hard to fix 
this 1553b driver.


02.02.2016 19:13, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:04:39AM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:

it looks much better with pci=routeirq

[  100.896723] *Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20*
[  100.896735] *After pci_enable_device IRQ 20*
[  100.896745] *Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21*
[  100.896752] *After pci_enable_device IRQ 21*

If pci=routeirq makes a difference, it usually means your driver is
looking at dev->irq before it calls pci_enable_device().  I looked at
what I think is your driver
(https://github.com/qmor/elcus-1553-driver-linux/blob/master/driver/tmk1553.c),
but I didn't *see* that problem.  It does use a highly unconventional
strategy of calling pci_get_device() to locate devices, instead of
using pci_register_driver() like normal drivers do.

You should not have to use pci=routeirq, and I've even considered
removing the option.


On Monday 01 of February 2016 15:08:23 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

[+cc Yinghai]

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:18:35AM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:

Okay. I've started from driver level printk
results are:

On 4.2

[414006.575989] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20

[414006.575991] After pci_enable_device IRQ 20

[414006.575997] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21

[414006.575999] After pci_enable_device IRQ 21

on 4.3

[  114.862289] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862303] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862316] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862326] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5

I've got two cards, because of that pci_enable_device() calls twice.

Did you try booting with pci=routeirq as Yinghai suggested?  That's
not a fix, but if it does make things work, it may give us an idea for
how to fix it correctly.


On Friday 29 of January 2016 10:31:59 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:28:14PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:

What i need to print out at first order?

Jiang, can you chime in here?

991de2e59090 is related to IRQs, so I'd start by printing dev->irq in
your
driver before and after you call pci_enable_device().  Add some printks
in
pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_enable_device() just to confirm that we
got

there and when, e.g., add lines like this:
   dev_info(>dev, "%s\n", __func__);

Bjorn


27 янв. 2016 г. 16:22 пользователь Bjorn Helgaas 

написал:

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:38:06PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:

Also, my drive has no

pcibios_enable_device()
pcibios_alloc_irq()

calls.

Those are internal interfaces used by the PCI core.  Drivers
shouldn't
call them directly.  Drivers normally call pci_enable_device(), and
those internal interfaces are used in that path.


26.01.2016 22:05, Олег Мороз пишет:

I confirmed it works in

890e4847587f

and do not works in

991de2e59090

26.01.2016 18:32, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

[+cc Jiang]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:52:51PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

Hi Олег,

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:

Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3
to bugzilla

I don't see anything wrong in either log.  Both v4.2 and v4.3
enumerate the device the same way, and the driver seems to
claim it

the same way:
   pci :0d:00.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2100-0x217f]
   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2380-0x239f]
   pci :0d:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   pci :0d:01.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2180-0x21ff]
   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x23a0-0x23bf]
   pci :0d:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   pci :0d:02.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2200-0x227f]
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2280-0x22ff]
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x1c: [io  0x2300-0x237f]
   pci :0d:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   
   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Detected "Eclus CAN-200-PCI"


card at slot #2

   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #1 at

0x00012280, irq 22 registered as can0

   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #2 at

0x00012300, irq 22 registered as can1

   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0 can0: setting BTR0=0x03
   BTR1=0x37

One option is always to bisect between v4.2 and v4.3 to see
which
commit made it stop working.  See
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect

Jiang, Олег bisected this to 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement
pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()").

Олег, please double-check and confirm that 890e4847587f works
and
991de2e59090 fails.

Then please add some printks in the pcibios_enable_device() and
pcibios_alloc_irq() paths and in your driver to see exactly what
changed
between 890e4847587f and 991de2e59090

Bjorn


23.01.2016 17:54, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

[+cc linux-kernel]

Hi

Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-02-02 Thread Олег Мороз
Ohhh. It's not my driver from scratch. I'm just trying to maintain it in 
working state.
Could you please advice me some correct and small and simple (I know I 
ask a lot) PCI driver as example. Maybe it will be not so hard to fix 
this 1553b driver.


02.02.2016 19:13, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:04:39AM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:

it looks much better with pci=routeirq

[  100.896723] *Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20*
[  100.896735] *After pci_enable_device IRQ 20*
[  100.896745] *Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21*
[  100.896752] *After pci_enable_device IRQ 21*

If pci=routeirq makes a difference, it usually means your driver is
looking at dev->irq before it calls pci_enable_device().  I looked at
what I think is your driver
(https://github.com/qmor/elcus-1553-driver-linux/blob/master/driver/tmk1553.c),
but I didn't *see* that problem.  It does use a highly unconventional
strategy of calling pci_get_device() to locate devices, instead of
using pci_register_driver() like normal drivers do.

You should not have to use pci=routeirq, and I've even considered
removing the option.


On Monday 01 of February 2016 15:08:23 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

[+cc Yinghai]

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:18:35AM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:

Okay. I've started from driver level printk
results are:

On 4.2

[414006.575989] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20

[414006.575991] After pci_enable_device IRQ 20

[414006.575997] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21

[414006.575999] After pci_enable_device IRQ 21

on 4.3

[  114.862289] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862303] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862316] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862326] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5

I've got two cards, because of that pci_enable_device() calls twice.

Did you try booting with pci=routeirq as Yinghai suggested?  That's
not a fix, but if it does make things work, it may give us an idea for
how to fix it correctly.


On Friday 29 of January 2016 10:31:59 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:28:14PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:

What i need to print out at first order?

Jiang, can you chime in here?

991de2e59090 is related to IRQs, so I'd start by printing dev->irq in
your
driver before and after you call pci_enable_device().  Add some printks
in
pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_enable_device() just to confirm that we
got

there and when, e.g., add lines like this:
   dev_info(>dev, "%s\n", __func__);

Bjorn


27 янв. 2016 г. 16:22 пользователь Bjorn Helgaas <helg...@kernel.org>

написал:

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:38:06PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:

Also, my drive has no

pcibios_enable_device()
pcibios_alloc_irq()

calls.

Those are internal interfaces used by the PCI core.  Drivers
shouldn't
call them directly.  Drivers normally call pci_enable_device(), and
those internal interfaces are used in that path.


26.01.2016 22:05, Олег Мороз пишет:

I confirmed it works in

890e4847587f

and do not works in

991de2e59090

26.01.2016 18:32, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

[+cc Jiang]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:52:51PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

Hi Олег,

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:

Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3
to bugzilla

I don't see anything wrong in either log.  Both v4.2 and v4.3
enumerate the device the same way, and the driver seems to
claim it

the same way:
   pci :0d:00.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2100-0x217f]
   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2380-0x239f]
   pci :0d:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   pci :0d:01.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2180-0x21ff]
   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x23a0-0x23bf]
   pci :0d:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   pci :0d:02.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2200-0x227f]
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2280-0x22ff]
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x1c: [io  0x2300-0x237f]
   pci :0d:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   
   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Detected "Eclus CAN-200-PCI"


card at slot #2

   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #1 at

0x00012280, irq 22 registered as can0

   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #2 at

0x00012300, irq 22 registered as can1

   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0 can0: setting BTR0=0x03
   BTR1=0x37

One option is always to bisect between v4.2 and v4.3 to see
which
commit made it stop working.  See
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect

Jiang, Олег bisected this to 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement
pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()").

Олег, please double-check and confirm that 890e4847587f works
and
991de2e59090 fails.

Then please add some printks in the pcibios_enable_device() and
pcibios_alloc_irq() paths and in your driver to see exactly what
changed
between 890e4847587f and 991de2e59090

Bjorn


23.01.2016 17:54, Bjorn Helgaas пише

Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-02-01 Thread Олег Мороз
it looks much better with pci=routeirq

[  100.896723] *Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20* 
[  100.896735] *After pci_enable_device IRQ 20* 
[  100.896745] *Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21* 
[  100.896752] *After pci_enable_device IRQ 21*


On Monday 01 of February 2016 15:08:23 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Yinghai]
> 
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:18:35AM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:
> > Okay. I've started from driver level printk
> > results are:
> > 
> > On 4.2
> > 
> > [414006.575989] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20
> > 
> > [414006.575991] After pci_enable_device IRQ 20
> > 
> > [414006.575997] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21
> > 
> > [414006.575999] After pci_enable_device IRQ 21
> > 
> > on 4.3
> > 
> > [  114.862289] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5
> > 
> > [  114.862303] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5
> > 
> > [  114.862316] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5
> > 
> > [  114.862326] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5
> > 
> > I've got two cards, because of that pci_enable_device() calls twice.
> 
> Did you try booting with pci=routeirq as Yinghai suggested?  That's
> not a fix, but if it does make things work, it may give us an idea for
> how to fix it correctly.
> 
> > On Friday 29 of January 2016 10:31:59 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:28:14PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:
> > > > What i need to print out at first order?
> > > 
> > > Jiang, can you chime in here?
> > > 
> > > 991de2e59090 is related to IRQs, so I'd start by printing dev->irq in
> > > your
> > > driver before and after you call pci_enable_device().  Add some printks
> > > in
> > > pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_enable_device() just to confirm that we
> > > got
> > > 
> > > there and when, e.g., add lines like this:
> > >   dev_info(>dev, "%s\n", __func__);
> > > 
> > > Bjorn
> > > 
> > > > 27 янв. 2016 г. 16:22 пользователь Bjorn Helgaas 
> > 
> > написал:
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:38:06PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:
> > > > > > Also, my drive has no
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > pcibios_enable_device()
> > > > > > pcibios_alloc_irq()
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > calls.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Those are internal interfaces used by the PCI core.  Drivers
> > > > > shouldn't
> > > > > call them directly.  Drivers normally call pci_enable_device(), and
> > > > > those internal interfaces are used in that path.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 26.01.2016 22:05, Олег Мороз пишет:
> > > > > > >I confirmed it works in
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >890e4847587f
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >and do not works in
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >991de2e59090
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >26.01.2016 18:32, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:
> > > > > > >>[+cc Jiang]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:52:51PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > > >>>Hi Олег,
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3
> > > > > > >>>>to bugzilla
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>I don't see anything wrong in either log.  Both v4.2 and v4.3
> > > > > > >>>enumerate the device the same way, and the driver seems to
> > > > > > >>>claim it
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>the same way:
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2100-0x217f]
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2380-0x239f]
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2180-0x21ff]
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: re

Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-02-01 Thread Олег Мороз
it looks much better with pci=routeirq

[  100.896723] *Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20* 
[  100.896735] *After pci_enable_device IRQ 20* 
[  100.896745] *Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21* 
[  100.896752] *After pci_enable_device IRQ 21*


On Monday 01 of February 2016 15:08:23 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Yinghai]
> 
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:18:35AM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:
> > Okay. I've started from driver level printk
> > results are:
> > 
> > On 4.2
> > 
> > [414006.575989] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20
> > 
> > [414006.575991] After pci_enable_device IRQ 20
> > 
> > [414006.575997] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21
> > 
> > [414006.575999] After pci_enable_device IRQ 21
> > 
> > on 4.3
> > 
> > [  114.862289] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5
> > 
> > [  114.862303] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5
> > 
> > [  114.862316] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5
> > 
> > [  114.862326] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5
> > 
> > I've got two cards, because of that pci_enable_device() calls twice.
> 
> Did you try booting with pci=routeirq as Yinghai suggested?  That's
> not a fix, but if it does make things work, it may give us an idea for
> how to fix it correctly.
> 
> > On Friday 29 of January 2016 10:31:59 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:28:14PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:
> > > > What i need to print out at first order?
> > > 
> > > Jiang, can you chime in here?
> > > 
> > > 991de2e59090 is related to IRQs, so I'd start by printing dev->irq in
> > > your
> > > driver before and after you call pci_enable_device().  Add some printks
> > > in
> > > pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_enable_device() just to confirm that we
> > > got
> > > 
> > > there and when, e.g., add lines like this:
> > >   dev_info(>dev, "%s\n", __func__);
> > > 
> > > Bjorn
> > > 
> > > > 27 янв. 2016 г. 16:22 пользователь Bjorn Helgaas <helg...@kernel.org>
> > 
> > написал:
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:38:06PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:
> > > > > > Also, my drive has no
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > pcibios_enable_device()
> > > > > > pcibios_alloc_irq()
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > calls.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Those are internal interfaces used by the PCI core.  Drivers
> > > > > shouldn't
> > > > > call them directly.  Drivers normally call pci_enable_device(), and
> > > > > those internal interfaces are used in that path.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 26.01.2016 22:05, Олег Мороз пишет:
> > > > > > >I confirmed it works in
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >890e4847587f
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >and do not works in
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >991de2e59090
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >26.01.2016 18:32, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:
> > > > > > >>[+cc Jiang]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:52:51PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > > >>>Hi Олег,
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3
> > > > > > >>>>to bugzilla
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>I don't see anything wrong in either log.  Both v4.2 and v4.3
> > > > > > >>>enumerate the device the same way, and the driver seems to
> > > > > > >>>claim it
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>the same way:
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2100-0x217f]
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2380-0x239f]
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2180-0x21ff]
> > > > > > >&g

Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-01-31 Thread Олег Мороз
Okay. I've started from driver level printk
results are:

On 4.2

[414006.575989] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20

[414006.575991] After pci_enable_device IRQ 20

[414006.575997] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21

[414006.575999] After pci_enable_device IRQ 21

on 4.3

[  114.862289] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862303] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862316] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862326] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5

I've got two cards, because of that pci_enable_device() calls twice.

On Friday 29 of January 2016 10:31:59 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:28:14PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:
> > What i need to print out at first order?
> 
> Jiang, can you chime in here?
> 
> 991de2e59090 is related to IRQs, so I'd start by printing dev->irq in your
> driver before and after you call pci_enable_device().  Add some printks in
> pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_enable_device() just to confirm that we got
> there and when, e.g., add lines like this:
> 
>   dev_info(>dev, "%s\n", __func__);
> 
> Bjorn
> 
> > 27 янв. 2016 г. 16:22 пользователь Bjorn Helgaas  
написал:
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:38:06PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:
> > > > Also, my drive has no
> > > > 
> > > > pcibios_enable_device()
> > > > pcibios_alloc_irq()
> > > > 
> > > > calls.
> > > 
> > > Those are internal interfaces used by the PCI core.  Drivers shouldn't
> > > call them directly.  Drivers normally call pci_enable_device(), and
> > > those internal interfaces are used in that path.
> > > 
> > > > 26.01.2016 22:05, Олег Мороз пишет:
> > > > >I confirmed it works in
> > > > >
> > > > >890e4847587f
> > > > >
> > > > >and do not works in
> > > > >
> > > > >991de2e59090
> > > > >
> > > > >26.01.2016 18:32, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:
> > > > >>[+cc Jiang]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:52:51PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > >>>Hi Олег,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:
> > > > >>>>Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3
> > > > >>>>to bugzilla
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>I don't see anything wrong in either log.  Both v4.2 and v4.3
> > > > >>>enumerate the device the same way, and the driver seems to claim it
> > > > >>>the same way:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2100-0x217f]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2380-0x239f]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2180-0x21ff]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x23a0-0x23bf]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2200-0x227f]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2280-0x22ff]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x1c: [io  0x2300-0x237f]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Detected "Eclus CAN-200-PCI"
> > > > >>>card at slot #2
> > > > >>>   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #1 at
> > > > >>>0x00012280, irq 22 registered as can0
> > > > >>>   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #2 at
> > > > >>>0x00012300, irq 22 registered as can1
> > > > >>>   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0 can0: setting BTR0=0x03 BTR1=0x37
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>One option is always to bisect between v4.2 and v4.3 to see which
> > > > >>>commit made it stop working.  See
> > > > >>>https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Jiang, Олег bisected this to 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement
> > > > >>pci

Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-01-31 Thread Олег Мороз
Okay. I've started from driver level printk
results are:

On 4.2

[414006.575989] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 20

[414006.575991] After pci_enable_device IRQ 20

[414006.575997] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 21

[414006.575999] After pci_enable_device IRQ 21

on 4.3

[  114.862289] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862303] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862316] Before pci_enable_device IRQ 5

[  114.862326] After pci_enable_device IRQ 5

I've got two cards, because of that pci_enable_device() calls twice.

On Friday 29 of January 2016 10:31:59 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:28:14PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:
> > What i need to print out at first order?
> 
> Jiang, can you chime in here?
> 
> 991de2e59090 is related to IRQs, so I'd start by printing dev->irq in your
> driver before and after you call pci_enable_device().  Add some printks in
> pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_enable_device() just to confirm that we got
> there and when, e.g., add lines like this:
> 
>   dev_info(>dev, "%s\n", __func__);
> 
> Bjorn
> 
> > 27 янв. 2016 г. 16:22 пользователь Bjorn Helgaas <helg...@kernel.org> 
написал:
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:38:06PM +0300, Мороз Олег wrote:
> > > > Also, my drive has no
> > > > 
> > > > pcibios_enable_device()
> > > > pcibios_alloc_irq()
> > > > 
> > > > calls.
> > > 
> > > Those are internal interfaces used by the PCI core.  Drivers shouldn't
> > > call them directly.  Drivers normally call pci_enable_device(), and
> > > those internal interfaces are used in that path.
> > > 
> > > > 26.01.2016 22:05, Олег Мороз пишет:
> > > > >I confirmed it works in
> > > > >
> > > > >890e4847587f
> > > > >
> > > > >and do not works in
> > > > >
> > > > >991de2e59090
> > > > >
> > > > >26.01.2016 18:32, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:
> > > > >>[+cc Jiang]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:52:51PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > >>>Hi Олег,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:
> > > > >>>>Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3
> > > > >>>>to bugzilla
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>I don't see anything wrong in either log.  Both v4.2 and v4.3
> > > > >>>enumerate the device the same way, and the driver seems to claim it
> > > > >>>the same way:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2100-0x217f]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2380-0x239f]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2180-0x21ff]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x23a0-0x23bf]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2200-0x227f]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2280-0x22ff]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x1c: [io  0x2300-0x237f]
> > > > >>>   pci :0d:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Detected "Eclus CAN-200-PCI"
> > > > >>>card at slot #2
> > > > >>>   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #1 at
> > > > >>>0x00012280, irq 22 registered as can0
> > > > >>>   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #2 at
> > > > >>>0x00012300, irq 22 registered as can1
> > > > >>>   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0 can0: setting BTR0=0x03 BTR1=0x37
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>One option is always to bisect between v4.2 and v4.3 to see which
> > > > >>>commit made it stop working.  See
> > > > >>>https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Jiang, Олег bisected this to 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement
&

Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-01-26 Thread Олег Мороз

I confirmed it works in

890e4847587f

and do not works in

991de2e59090

26.01.2016 18:32, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

[+cc Jiang]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:52:51PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

Hi Олег,

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:

Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3 to bugzilla

I don't see anything wrong in either log.  Both v4.2 and v4.3
enumerate the device the same way, and the driver seems to claim it
the same way:

   pci :0d:00.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2100-0x217f]
   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2380-0x239f]
   pci :0d:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   pci :0d:01.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2180-0x21ff]
   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x23a0-0x23bf]
   pci :0d:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   pci :0d:02.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2200-0x227f]
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2280-0x22ff]
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x1c: [io  0x2300-0x237f]
   pci :0d:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot

   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Detected "Eclus CAN-200-PCI" card at slot #2
   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #1 at 0x00012280, irq 22 
registered as can0
   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #2 at 0x00012300, irq 22 
registered as can1
   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0 can0: setting BTR0=0x03 BTR1=0x37

One option is always to bisect between v4.2 and v4.3 to see which
commit made it stop working.  See https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect

Jiang, Олег bisected this to 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement
pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()").

Олег, please double-check and confirm that 890e4847587f works and
991de2e59090 fails.

Then please add some printks in the pcibios_enable_device() and
pcibios_alloc_irq() paths and in your driver to see exactly what changed
between 890e4847587f and 991de2e59090

Bjorn


23.01.2016 17:54, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

[+cc linux-kernel]

Hi Олег,

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Олег Мороз  wrote:

Hello. I've got a device driver for MIL-1553b card called TA1-PCI, which
could be found at
https://github.com/qmor/elcus-1553-driver-linux
Card is using PLX_PCI9030 PCI controller.
Today i've found that this driver compiles, installes, but is not working as
it should.
Looks like it not receives any interrupts from PCI. I've test it again with
kernel
4.2 and it works okay. What changes was made in PCI subsystem from 4.2 to
4.3
which could have impact this driver work.

Thank you very much for this problem report.  There were many PCI
changes between v4.2 and v4.3, and without more information, I can't
guess what might be causing this problem.

I opened a bug report at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111211

Please attach complete dmesg logs for both v4.2 and v4.3 to that bug
report.  Also, please attach the complete "lspci -vv" output (as
root).

Thanks!

Bjorn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-01-26 Thread Олег Мороз

I confirmed it works in

890e4847587f

and do not works in

991de2e59090

26.01.2016 18:32, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

[+cc Jiang]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:52:51PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

Hi Олег,

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0300, Олег Мороз wrote:

Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3 to bugzilla

I don't see anything wrong in either log.  Both v4.2 and v4.3
enumerate the device the same way, and the driver seems to claim it
the same way:

   pci :0d:00.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2100-0x217f]
   pci :0d:00.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2380-0x239f]
   pci :0d:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   pci :0d:01.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2180-0x21ff]
   pci :0d:01.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x23a0-0x23bf]
   pci :0d:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
   pci :0d:02.0: [10b5:9030] type 00 class 0x078000
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x2200-0x227f]
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x2280-0x22ff]
   pci :0d:02.0: reg 0x1c: [io  0x2300-0x237f]
   pci :0d:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot

   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Detected "Eclus CAN-200-PCI" card at slot #2
   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #1 at 0x00012280, irq 22 
registered as can0
   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0: Channel #2 at 0x00012300, irq 22 
registered as can1
   sja1000_plx_pci :0d:02.0 can0: setting BTR0=0x03 BTR1=0x37

One option is always to bisect between v4.2 and v4.3 to see which
commit made it stop working.  See https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect

Jiang, Олег bisected this to 991de2e59090 ("PCI, x86: Implement
pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()").

Олег, please double-check and confirm that 890e4847587f works and
991de2e59090 fails.

Then please add some printks in the pcibios_enable_device() and
pcibios_alloc_irq() paths and in your driver to see exactly what changed
between 890e4847587f and 991de2e59090

Bjorn


23.01.2016 17:54, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

[+cc linux-kernel]

Hi Олег,

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Олег Мороз <oleg.mo...@mcc.vniiem.ru> wrote:

Hello. I've got a device driver for MIL-1553b card called TA1-PCI, which
could be found at
https://github.com/qmor/elcus-1553-driver-linux
Card is using PLX_PCI9030 PCI controller.
Today i've found that this driver compiles, installes, but is not working as
it should.
Looks like it not receives any interrupts from PCI. I've test it again with
kernel
4.2 and it works okay. What changes was made in PCI subsystem from 4.2 to
4.3
which could have impact this driver work.

Thank you very much for this problem report.  There were many PCI
changes between v4.2 and v4.3, and without more information, I can't
guess what might be causing this problem.

I opened a bug report at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111211

Please attach complete dmesg logs for both v4.2 and v4.3 to that bug
report.  Also, please attach the complete "lspci -vv" output (as
root).

Thanks!

Bjorn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-01-24 Thread Олег Мороз

Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3 to bugzilla

23.01.2016 17:54, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

[+cc linux-kernel]

Hi Олег,

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Олег Мороз  wrote:

Hello. I've got a device driver for MIL-1553b card called TA1-PCI, which
could be found at
https://github.com/qmor/elcus-1553-driver-linux
Card is using PLX_PCI9030 PCI controller.
Today i've found that this driver compiles, installes, but is not working as
it should.
Looks like it not receives any interrupts from PCI. I've test it again with
kernel
4.2 and it works okay. What changes was made in PCI subsystem from 4.2 to
4.3
which could have impact this driver work.

Thank you very much for this problem report.  There were many PCI
changes between v4.2 and v4.3, and without more information, I can't
guess what might be causing this problem.

I opened a bug report at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111211

Please attach complete dmesg logs for both v4.2 and v4.3 to that bug
report.  Also, please attach the complete "lspci -vv" output (as
root).

Thanks!

Bjorn




Re: PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-01-24 Thread Олег Мороз

Okay. I've sent logs (dmesg and lspci) from both 4.2 and 4.3 to bugzilla

23.01.2016 17:54, Bjorn Helgaas пишет:

[+cc linux-kernel]

Hi Олег,

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Олег Мороз <oleg.mo...@mcc.vniiem.ru> wrote:

Hello. I've got a device driver for MIL-1553b card called TA1-PCI, which
could be found at
https://github.com/qmor/elcus-1553-driver-linux
Card is using PLX_PCI9030 PCI controller.
Today i've found that this driver compiles, installes, but is not working as
it should.
Looks like it not receives any interrupts from PCI. I've test it again with
kernel
4.2 and it works okay. What changes was made in PCI subsystem from 4.2 to
4.3
which could have impact this driver work.

Thank you very much for this problem report.  There were many PCI
changes between v4.2 and v4.3, and without more information, I can't
guess what might be causing this problem.

I opened a bug report at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111211

Please attach complete dmesg logs for both v4.2 and v4.3 to that bug
report.  Also, please attach the complete "lspci -vv" output (as
root).

Thanks!

Bjorn




PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-01-22 Thread Олег Мороз

Hello. I've got a device driver for MIL-1553b card called TA1-PCI, which could 
be found at
 https://github.com/qmor/elcus-1553-driver-linux
Card is using PLX_PCI9030 PCI controller.
Today i've found that this driver compiles, installes, but is not working as it 
should.
Looks like it not receives any interrupts from PCI. I've test it again with 
kernel
4.2 and it works okay. What changes was made in PCI subsystem from 4.2 to 4.3
which could have impact this driver work.



PCI device driver broken between 4.2 and 4.3

2016-01-22 Thread Олег Мороз

Hello. I've got a device driver for MIL-1553b card called TA1-PCI, which could 
be found at
 https://github.com/qmor/elcus-1553-driver-linux
Card is using PLX_PCI9030 PCI controller.
Today i've found that this driver compiles, installes, but is not working as it 
should.
Looks like it not receives any interrupts from PCI. I've test it again with 
kernel
4.2 and it works okay. What changes was made in PCI subsystem from 4.2 to 4.3
which could have impact this driver work.