Re: ServeRaid 4M with IBM netfinity and kernel 2.4.x
On Friday 16 February 2001 03:29, Stéphane Borel wrote: > I should add that the behaviour of serveraid under 2.4 is somehow > strange : during fsck for instance, it seems to get stuck and won't > go further if we don't strike a key on the keyboard. It just a gues, but try disable write back cache. I had similar problems with intel crcu31 RAID controller. Good luck. -- Andrius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: ServeRaid 4M with IBM netfinity and kernel 2.4.x
On Friday 16 February 2001 03:29, Stéphane Borel wrote: I should add that the behaviour of serveraid under 2.4 is somehow strange : during fsck for instance, it seems to get stuck and won't go further if we don't strike a key on the keyboard. It just a gues, but try disable write back cache. I had similar problems with intel crcu31 RAID controller. Good luck. -- Andrius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
strange tcp errors
Messages in my kernel log: node1 kernel: sending pkt_too_big to self node1 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->lost_out == 0) failed at tcp_input.c(1202):tcp_remove_reno_sacks Kernel 2.4.1-ac13. Maybe someone want to say me what does it mean and how serious it is? Any fixes? Thanks. -- Andrius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
strange tcp errors
Messages in my kernel log: node1 kernel: sending pkt_too_big to self node1 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp-lost_out == 0) failed at tcp_input.c(1202):tcp_remove_reno_sacks Kernel 2.4.1-ac13. Maybe someone want to say me what does it mean and how serious it is? Any fixes? Thanks. -- Andrius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1
On Saturday 10 February 2001 22:16, David Ford wrote: > Just as an aside, I've watched this conversation go on and on while I > run reiserfs on several servers, workstations, and a notebook. I > have current kernels and have watched carefully for corruption. I > haven't seen any evidence of corruption on any of them including my > notebook which has a bad battery and bad power connection so it tends > to instantly die. > > Alan, is there a particular trigger to this? Want to trigger this? Just install reiserfs on Dual SMP machine with huge RAID acting as mail server for 90k mailboxes. After several hours you'll get a lot reiserfs_read_inode2/reiserfs_iget: bad_inode msgs in your kern.log... Good luck. -- Andrius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1
On Saturday 10 February 2001 22:16, David Ford wrote: Just as an aside, I've watched this conversation go on and on while I run reiserfs on several servers, workstations, and a notebook. I have current kernels and have watched carefully for corruption. I haven't seen any evidence of corruption on any of them including my notebook which has a bad battery and bad power connection so it tends to instantly die. Alan, is there a particular trigger to this? Want to trigger this? Just install reiserfs on Dual SMP machine with huge RAID acting as mail server for 90k mailboxes. After several hours you'll get a lot reiserfs_read_inode2/reiserfs_iget: bad_inode msgs in your kern.log... Good luck. -- Andrius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Problems with 2.4.2-pre1 & reiser & vfs
Hello, I have dual PIII 800 machine running as mail server on DAC 960 RAID & reiserfs comming with 2.4.1kernel. Under very high loads I get following messages in my kernel log: kernel: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data of object [7906789 7906806 0x0 SD](nlink == 1) not found (pos 23) kernel: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data of object [7906789 7906806 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 23) kernel: PAP-5660: reiserfs_do_truncate: wrong result -1 of search for [7906789 7906806 0xfff DIRECT] kernel: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data of object [7906789 7906806 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 23) kernel: PAP-5660: reiserfs_do_truncate: wrong result -1 of search for [7906789 7906806 0xfff DIRECT] . and afterwards come these: kernel: vs-3050: wait_buffer_until_released: nobody releases buffer (dev 30:09, size 4096, blocknr 1661732, count 16, kernel: vs-3050: wait_buffer_until_released: nobody releases buffer (dev 30:09, size 4096, blocknr 1661732, count 16, ... and so on. The interesting thing is that system is still operational, but load jumps up to 260 or so, and any attempts to reboot system fail. ps aux shows that there exists imortal (kill -9 $PID doesn't kill it) qmail process that consumes 97% of one CPU's resources. Also `vmstat` shows tons of processes in uninterruptable sleep, but `free` reports that it is still enough memory (no swap used) and huge buffers... Machine gets slugish but works for a while (0.5-2h dependent on mail request rate). System is Debian potato, gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux), reiserfs utils 3.6.25. Any patches or suggestions to fix that would be appreciated... P.S. Also I thought wouldn't it be good to have some sysctl entry in proc that rebooted machine dependent on the value in control file when proper software reboot is impossible (like in situation described above)? Or probably there already exist(s) such thing(s)? Thanks. -- Andrius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Problems with 2.4.2-pre1 reiser vfs
Hello, I have dual PIII 800 machine running as mail server on DAC 960 RAID reiserfs comming with 2.4.1kernel. Under very high loads I get following messages in my kernel log: kernel: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data of object [7906789 7906806 0x0 SD](nlink == 1) not found (pos 23) kernel: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data of object [7906789 7906806 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 23) kernel: PAP-5660: reiserfs_do_truncate: wrong result -1 of search for [7906789 7906806 0xfff DIRECT] kernel: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data of object [7906789 7906806 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 23) kernel: PAP-5660: reiserfs_do_truncate: wrong result -1 of search for [7906789 7906806 0xfff DIRECT] . and afterwards come these: kernel: vs-3050: wait_buffer_until_released: nobody releases buffer (dev 30:09, size 4096, blocknr 1661732, count 16, kernel: vs-3050: wait_buffer_until_released: nobody releases buffer (dev 30:09, size 4096, blocknr 1661732, count 16, ... and so on. The interesting thing is that system is still operational, but load jumps up to 260 or so, and any attempts to reboot system fail. ps aux shows that there exists imortal (kill -9 $PID doesn't kill it) qmail process that consumes 97% of one CPU's resources. Also `vmstat` shows tons of processes in uninterruptable sleep, but `free` reports that it is still enough memory (no swap used) and huge buffers... Machine gets slugish but works for a while (0.5-2h dependent on mail request rate). System is Debian potato, gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux), reiserfs utils 3.6.25. Any patches or suggestions to fix that would be appreciated... P.S. Also I thought wouldn't it be good to have some sysctl entry in proc that rebooted machine dependent on the value in control file when proper software reboot is impossible (like in situation described above)? Or probably there already exist(s) such thing(s)? Thanks. -- Andrius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
LOCKUP on CPU x
CI: Using configuration type 1 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PCI: Probing PCI hardware Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX [8086/122e] at 00:04.0 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Limiting direct PCI/PCI transfers. Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: IP: routing cache hash table of 4096 buckets, 32Kbytes Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: TCP: Hash tables configured (established 32768 bind 32768) Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Starting kswapd v1.7 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 21 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PIIX4: chipset revision 1 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd800-0xd807, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: ide1: BM-DMA at 0xd808-0xd80f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: hd1: C/H/S=20510/81/228 from BIOS ignored Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: hda: SAMSUNG CD-ROM SC-140F, ATAPI CDROM drive Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: hdb: SAMSUNG SV1022D, ATA DISK drive Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: sym53c8xx: at PCI bus 0, device 10, function 0 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: sym53c8xx: setting PCI_COMMAND_PARITY...(fix-up) Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: sym53c8xx: 53c895 detected with Symbios NVRAM Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Real Time Clock Driver v1.10c Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: 3c59x.c:LK1.1.8 13 Aug 2000 Donald Becker and others. http://www.scyld.com/network/vortex.html $Revision: 1.102.2.25 $ Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: See Documentation/networking/vortex.txt Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: eth0: 3Com PCI 3c905 Boomerang 100baseTx at 0xb800, 00:60:08:69:82:fc, IRQ 11 Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: 8K word-wide RAM 3:5 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/MII interface. Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: MII transceiver found at address 24, status 786d. Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives. Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: ip_tables: (c)2000 Netfilter core team Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 08:02) ... Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: ReiserFS version 3.6.14 Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: VFS: Mounted root (reiserfs filesystem) readonly. Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Freeing unused kernel memory: 204k freed Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Adding Swap: 136512k swap-space (priority -1) Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 08:05) ... Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: eth0: first available media type: MII Oct 3 14:42:02 cl1 kernel: Serial driver version 5.02 (2000-08-09) with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled Hope this helps to find out problem. If I somehow could help debuging - just let me know. Thanks for reading. -- // Andrius AdomaitisSistemu Administratorius // [EMAIL PROTECTED]UAB Gaumina dizainas // tel.+370-85-54454http://www.gaumina.lt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
LOCKUP on CPU x
: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xf0730, last bus=1 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PCI: Using configuration type 1 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PCI: Probing PCI hardware Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX [8086/122e] at 00:04.0 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Limiting direct PCI/PCI transfers. Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: IP: routing cache hash table of 4096 buckets, 32Kbytes Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: TCP: Hash tables configured (established 32768 bind 32768) Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Starting kswapd v1.7 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 21 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PIIX4: chipset revision 1 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd800-0xd807, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: ide1: BM-DMA at 0xd808-0xd80f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: hd1: C/H/S=20510/81/228 from BIOS ignored Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: hda: SAMSUNG CD-ROM SC-140F, ATAPI CDROM drive Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: hdb: SAMSUNG SV1022D, ATA DISK drive Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: sym53c8xx: at PCI bus 0, device 10, function 0 Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: sym53c8xx: setting PCI_COMMAND_PARITY...(fix-up) Oct 3 14:41:16 cl1 kernel: sym53c8xx: 53c895 detected with Symbios NVRAM scsi part skipped Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Real Time Clock Driver v1.10c Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: 3c59x.c:LK1.1.8 13 Aug 2000 Donald Becker and others. http://www.scyld.com/network/vortex.html $Revision: 1.102.2.25 $ Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: See Documentation/networking/vortex.txt Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: eth0: 3Com PCI 3c905 Boomerang 100baseTx at 0xb800, 00:60:08:69:82:fc, IRQ 11 Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: 8K word-wide RAM 3:5 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/MII interface. Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: MII transceiver found at address 24, status 786d. Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives. Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: ip_tables: (c)2000 Netfilter core team Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 08:02) ... Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: ReiserFS version 3.6.14 Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: VFS: Mounted root (reiserfs filesystem) readonly. Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Freeing unused kernel memory: 204k freed Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: Adding Swap: 136512k swap-space (priority -1) Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 08:05) reiserfs replay skipped ... Oct 3 14:41:23 cl1 kernel: eth0: first available media type: MII Oct 3 14:42:02 cl1 kernel: Serial driver version 5.02 (2000-08-09) with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled Hope this helps to find out problem. If I somehow could help debuging - just let me know. Thanks for reading. -- // Andrius AdomaitisSistemu Administratorius // [EMAIL PROTECTED]UAB Gaumina dizainas // tel.+370-85-54454http://www.gaumina.lt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Strange vmstat report...
Hello, I am not sure if this is kernel related or procps utils, but: [root@castle log]# vmstat 1 5 | tail -6 | awk '{ print $16 }' id 1 1 19884107 <-- is this normal?! 1 0 Kernel 2.4.0-test2-ac2, procps-2.0.7. Thanks. -- // Andrius AdomaitisSistemu Administratorius // [EMAIL PROTECTED]UAB Gaumina dizainas // tel.+370-85-54454http://www.gaumina.lt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Strange vmstat report...
Hello, I am not sure if this is kernel related or procps utils, but: [root@castle log]# vmstat 1 5 | tail -6 | awk '{ print $16 }' id 1 1 19884107 -- is this normal?! 1 0 Kernel 2.4.0-test2-ac2, procps-2.0.7. Thanks. -- // Andrius AdomaitisSistemu Administratorius // [EMAIL PROTECTED]UAB Gaumina dizainas // tel.+370-85-54454http://www.gaumina.lt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/