Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix logic change introduced by wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:39:21 -0500 "Cory T. Tusar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> tty: Fix logic change introduced by wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
>>
>> Commit 5a52bd4a2dcb570333ce6fe2e16cd311650dbdc8 introduced a subtle logic
>> change in tty_wait_until_sent(). The original version would only error
>> out of the 'do { ... } while (timeout)' loop if signal_pending() evaluated
>> to true; a timeout or break due to an empty buffer would fall out of the
>> loop and into the tty->driver->wait_until_sent handling. The current
>> implementation will error out on either a pending signal or an empty
>> buffer, falling through to the tty->driver->wait_until_sent handling
>> only on a timeout.
>>
>> This change reverts the logic flow in tty_wait_until_sent() to match that
>> prior to the aforementioned commit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cory T. Tusar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> ---
>> Please CC me on any replies; I'm not subscribed to lkml. Thanks.
>>
>> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c |2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c b/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
>> index 1bdd2bf..e02d592 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void tty_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct * tty, long
>> timeout)
>> if (!timeout)
>> timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
>> if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(tty->write_wait,
>> -!tty->driver->chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout))
>> +!tty->driver->chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout) < 0)
>> return;
>> if (tty->driver->wait_until_sent)
>> tty->driver->wait_until_sent(tty, timeout);
>
> OK... So what are the user-visible effects of this regression? The caller
> will run ->wait_until_sent() even after being signalled? So the signal is
> not promptly responded to?
No, the ->wait_until_sent() will not be reached if the buffer empties
before timeout jiffies have elapsed. This behavior differs from that
prior to commit 5a52bd4a2dcb570333ce6fe2e16cd311650dbdc8.
I turned this up while using a little serial download utility to
bootstrap an ARM-based eval board. The util worked fine on 2.6.22.x,
but consistently failed on 2.6.23.x. Once I'd determined that, I
narrowed things down with git bisect, and found the above difference
in logic in tty_wait_until_sent() by inspection.
If you'd like a more in-depth analysis of what's breaking on the
user-space side, I can certainly investigate further and (hopefully) come
up with a simple test case that tickles this issue.
--
Cory T. Tusar
Embedded Systems Engineer
Videon Central, Inc.
2171 Sandy Drive
State College, PA 16803
(814) 235- x316
(814) 235-1118 fax
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies." --Sir Charles Anthony Richard Hoare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix logic change introduced by wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:39:21 -0500 Cory T. Tusar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tty: Fix logic change introduced by wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
Commit 5a52bd4a2dcb570333ce6fe2e16cd311650dbdc8 introduced a subtle logic
change in tty_wait_until_sent(). The original version would only error
out of the 'do { ... } while (timeout)' loop if signal_pending() evaluated
to true; a timeout or break due to an empty buffer would fall out of the
loop and into the tty-driver-wait_until_sent handling. The current
implementation will error out on either a pending signal or an empty
buffer, falling through to the tty-driver-wait_until_sent handling
only on a timeout.
This change reverts the logic flow in tty_wait_until_sent() to match that
prior to the aforementioned commit.
Signed-off-by: Cory T. Tusar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Please CC me on any replies; I'm not subscribed to lkml. Thanks.
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c b/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
index 1bdd2bf..e02d592 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void tty_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct * tty, long
timeout)
if (!timeout)
timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(tty-write_wait,
-!tty-driver-chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout))
+!tty-driver-chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout) 0)
return;
if (tty-driver-wait_until_sent)
tty-driver-wait_until_sent(tty, timeout);
OK... So what are the user-visible effects of this regression? The caller
will run -wait_until_sent() even after being signalled? So the signal is
not promptly responded to?
No, the -wait_until_sent() will not be reached if the buffer empties
before timeout jiffies have elapsed. This behavior differs from that
prior to commit 5a52bd4a2dcb570333ce6fe2e16cd311650dbdc8.
I turned this up while using a little serial download utility to
bootstrap an ARM-based eval board. The util worked fine on 2.6.22.x,
but consistently failed on 2.6.23.x. Once I'd determined that, I
narrowed things down with git bisect, and found the above difference
in logic in tty_wait_until_sent() by inspection.
If you'd like a more in-depth analysis of what's breaking on the
user-space side, I can certainly investigate further and (hopefully) come
up with a simple test case that tickles this issue.
--
Cory T. Tusar
Embedded Systems Engineer
Videon Central, Inc.
2171 Sandy Drive
State College, PA 16803
(814) 235- x316
(814) 235-1118 fax
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies. --Sir Charles Anthony Richard Hoare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] tty: Fix logic change introduced by wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
tty: Fix logic change introduced by wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
Commit 5a52bd4a2dcb570333ce6fe2e16cd311650dbdc8 introduced a subtle logic
change in tty_wait_until_sent(). The original version would only error
out of the 'do { ... } while (timeout)' loop if signal_pending() evaluated
to true; a timeout or break due to an empty buffer would fall out of the
loop and into the tty->driver->wait_until_sent handling. The current
implementation will error out on either a pending signal or an empty
buffer, falling through to the tty->driver->wait_until_sent handling
only on a timeout.
This change reverts the logic flow in tty_wait_until_sent() to match that
prior to the aforementioned commit.
Signed-off-by: Cory T. Tusar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Please CC me on any replies; I'm not subscribed to lkml. Thanks.
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c b/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
index 1bdd2bf..e02d592 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void tty_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct * tty, long
timeout)
if (!timeout)
timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(tty->write_wait,
- !tty->driver->chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout))
+ !tty->driver->chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout) < 0)
return;
if (tty->driver->wait_until_sent)
tty->driver->wait_until_sent(tty, timeout);
--
Cory T. Tusar
Embedded Systems Engineer
Videon Central, Inc.
2171 Sandy Drive
State College, PA 16803
(814) 235- x316
(814) 235-1118 fax
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies." --Sir Charles Anthony Richard Hoare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] tty: Fix logic change introduced by wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
tty: Fix logic change introduced by wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
Commit 5a52bd4a2dcb570333ce6fe2e16cd311650dbdc8 introduced a subtle logic
change in tty_wait_until_sent(). The original version would only error
out of the 'do { ... } while (timeout)' loop if signal_pending() evaluated
to true; a timeout or break due to an empty buffer would fall out of the
loop and into the tty-driver-wait_until_sent handling. The current
implementation will error out on either a pending signal or an empty
buffer, falling through to the tty-driver-wait_until_sent handling
only on a timeout.
This change reverts the logic flow in tty_wait_until_sent() to match that
prior to the aforementioned commit.
Signed-off-by: Cory T. Tusar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Please CC me on any replies; I'm not subscribed to lkml. Thanks.
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c b/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
index 1bdd2bf..e02d592 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void tty_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct * tty, long
timeout)
if (!timeout)
timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(tty-write_wait,
- !tty-driver-chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout))
+ !tty-driver-chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout) 0)
return;
if (tty-driver-wait_until_sent)
tty-driver-wait_until_sent(tty, timeout);
--
Cory T. Tusar
Embedded Systems Engineer
Videon Central, Inc.
2171 Sandy Drive
State College, PA 16803
(814) 235- x316
(814) 235-1118 fax
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies. --Sir Charles Anthony Richard Hoare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
