Re: 2.2 <-> 2.4.5-ac5 tcp too slow (false alarm)

2001-06-05 Thread Ingo T. Storm

>Right now I am compiling 2.4.5 on the clients to verify that it's an
>2.2 vs 2.4 issue.

It wasn't 2.4 vs. 2.2 but the tulip driver. Swapped it for a dual
eepro100 and  geth 8MB/s (tbench 4) now.

Ingo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: 2.2 <-> 2.4.5-ac5 tcp too slow

2001-06-05 Thread Ingo T. Storm

>reference in the list archives. i have an x86 laptop running 2.2.17
(2.2.19
>has the same effect) and an alpha pws 500 running 2.4.5-ac5. tcp
starts slow
>and get slower.

Same here. I've set up an Alpha Ruffian with a Quad Starfire as a new
firewall. My test clients were x86/2.2.16-18 up to now. TBench between
two clients directly: 10 MB/S. TBench through the 2.4.4/5 router: 0,4
MB/s.

Right now I am compiling 2.4.5 on the clients to verify that it's an
2.2 vs 2.4 issue.

Ingo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: 2.2 - 2.4.5-ac5 tcp too slow

2001-06-05 Thread Ingo T. Storm

reference in the list archives. i have an x86 laptop running 2.2.17
(2.2.19
has the same effect) and an alpha pws 500 running 2.4.5-ac5. tcp
starts slow
and get slower.

Same here. I've set up an Alpha Ruffian with a Quad Starfire as a new
firewall. My test clients were x86/2.2.16-18 up to now. TBench between
two clients directly: 10 MB/S. TBench through the 2.4.4/5 router: 0,4
MB/s.

Right now I am compiling 2.4.5 on the clients to verify that it's an
2.2 vs 2.4 issue.

Ingo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: 2.2 - 2.4.5-ac5 tcp too slow (false alarm)

2001-06-05 Thread Ingo T. Storm

Right now I am compiling 2.4.5 on the clients to verify that it's an
2.2 vs 2.4 issue.

It wasn't 2.4 vs. 2.2 but the tulip driver. Swapped it for a dual
eepro100 and  geth 8MB/s (tbench 4) now.

Ingo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Ingo T. Storm

Hi,

I just tried to compile 2.4.5 on a Ruffian. With CPU selection "generic" it
fails when linking the kernel (see below). With CPU=Ruffian, it compiles and
links fine. Haven't tried booting yet, 'cause the machine is some 20 miles
away from here.

What more can I provide/do to help?

Cheers,
Ingo

-

ld  -r -o kernel.o entry.o traps.o process.o osf_sys.o irq.o irq_alpha.o
signal.
o setup.o ptrace.o time.o semaphore.o alpha_ksyms.o irq_i8259.o irq_srm.o
es1888
.o smc37c669.o smc37c93x.o ns87312.o pci.o pci_iommu.o core_apecs.o
core_cia.o c
ore_irongate.o core_lca.o core_mcpcia.o core_polaris.o core_t2.o
core_tsunami.o
core_titan.o sys_alcor.o sys_cabriolet.o sys_dp264.o sys_eb64p.o sys_eiger.o
sys
_jensen.o sys_miata.o sys_mikasa.o sys_nautilus.o sys_titan.o sys_noritake.o
sys
_rawhide.o sys_ruffian.o sys_rx164.o sys_sable.o sys_sio.o sys_sx164.o
sys_takar
a.o sys_wildfire.o core_wildfire.o irq_pyxis.o
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_inb':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x440): multiple definition of `tsunami_inb'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x500):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `clipper_map_irq':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x480): multiple definition of `tsunami_inw'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x540):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_inl':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x4c0): multiple definition of `tsunami_inl'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x580):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_outb':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x460): multiple definition of `tsunami_outb'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x520):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_outw':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x4a0): multiple definition of `tsunami_outw'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x560):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `dp264_init_pci':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x4e0): multiple definition of `tsunami_outl'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x5a0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_readb':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x540): multiple definition of `tsunami_readb'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x600):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_readw':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x560): multiple definition of `tsunami_readw'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x620):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `webbrick_init_arch':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x580): multiple definition of `tsunami_readl'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x640):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_readq':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x5a0): multiple definition of `tsunami_readq'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x660):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_writeb':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x5c0): multiple definition of `tsunami_writeb'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x680):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_writew':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x5e0): multiple definition of `tsunami_writew'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x6a0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_writel':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x600): multiple definition of `tsunami_writel'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x6c0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_writeq':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x620): multiple definition of `tsunami_writeq'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x6e0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_ioremap':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x500): multiple definition of `tsunami_ioremap'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x5c0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `monet_init_pci':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x520): multiple definition of `tsunami_is_ioaddr'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x5e0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
make[1]: *** [kernel.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5/arch/alpha/kernel'
make: *** [_dir_arch/alpha/kernel] Error 2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Ingo T. Storm

Hi,

I just tried to compile 2.4.5 on a Ruffian. With CPU selection generic it
fails when linking the kernel (see below). With CPU=Ruffian, it compiles and
links fine. Haven't tried booting yet, 'cause the machine is some 20 miles
away from here.

What more can I provide/do to help?

Cheers,
Ingo

-

ld  -r -o kernel.o entry.o traps.o process.o osf_sys.o irq.o irq_alpha.o
signal.
o setup.o ptrace.o time.o semaphore.o alpha_ksyms.o irq_i8259.o irq_srm.o
es1888
.o smc37c669.o smc37c93x.o ns87312.o pci.o pci_iommu.o core_apecs.o
core_cia.o c
ore_irongate.o core_lca.o core_mcpcia.o core_polaris.o core_t2.o
core_tsunami.o
core_titan.o sys_alcor.o sys_cabriolet.o sys_dp264.o sys_eb64p.o sys_eiger.o
sys
_jensen.o sys_miata.o sys_mikasa.o sys_nautilus.o sys_titan.o sys_noritake.o
sys
_rawhide.o sys_ruffian.o sys_rx164.o sys_sable.o sys_sio.o sys_sx164.o
sys_takar
a.o sys_wildfire.o core_wildfire.o irq_pyxis.o
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_inb':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x440): multiple definition of `tsunami_inb'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x500):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `clipper_map_irq':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x480): multiple definition of `tsunami_inw'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x540):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_inl':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x4c0): multiple definition of `tsunami_inl'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x580):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_outb':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x460): multiple definition of `tsunami_outb'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x520):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_outw':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x4a0): multiple definition of `tsunami_outw'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x560):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `dp264_init_pci':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x4e0): multiple definition of `tsunami_outl'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x5a0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_readb':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x540): multiple definition of `tsunami_readb'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x600):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_readw':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x560): multiple definition of `tsunami_readw'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x620):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `webbrick_init_arch':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x580): multiple definition of `tsunami_readl'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x640):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_readq':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x5a0): multiple definition of `tsunami_readq'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x660):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_writeb':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x5c0): multiple definition of `tsunami_writeb'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x680):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_writew':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x5e0): multiple definition of `tsunami_writew'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x6a0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_writel':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x600): multiple definition of `tsunami_writel'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x6c0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_writeq':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x620): multiple definition of `tsunami_writeq'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x6e0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_ioremap':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x500): multiple definition of `tsunami_ioremap'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x5c0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
sys_dp264.o: In function `monet_init_pci':
sys_dp264.c(.text+0x520): multiple definition of `tsunami_is_ioaddr'
core_tsunami.o(.text+0x5e0):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
make[1]: *** [kernel.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5/arch/alpha/kernel'
make: *** [_dir_arch/alpha/kernel] Error 2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: DHCP Problems with 3com 3c905C Tornado

2001-01-04 Thread Ingo T. Storm

>  I recently installed a system with the 3c905C
>NIC on RedHat 6.2.

>  The freshly installed RedHat 6.2 worked nice
>and flawlessly,

>However after upgrading
>to the 2.2.16 RedHat Kernel RPMS, the DHCP negotiation
>no longer worked!

>I downloaded 2.2.18 proper. I compiled in the support
>for the card, but also: same result.

Have you checked conf.modules that now is modules.conf?

In my case rh had just renamed/aliased the device and as soon as I had
adapted modules.conf accordingly, the card worked.

Of course, I might have completely misunderstood the problem, but it
sounds a lot like what I saw...

Cheers,

Ingo



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: DHCP Problems with 3com 3c905C Tornado

2001-01-04 Thread Ingo T. Storm

  I recently installed a system with the 3c905C
NIC on RedHat 6.2.

  The freshly installed RedHat 6.2 worked nice
and flawlessly,

However after upgrading
to the 2.2.16 RedHat Kernel RPMS, the DHCP negotiation
no longer worked!

I downloaded 2.2.18 proper. I compiled in the support
for the card, but also: same result.

Have you checked conf.modules that now is modules.conf?

In my case rh had just renamed/aliased the device and as soon as I had
adapted modules.conf accordingly, the card worked.

Of course, I might have completely misunderstood the problem, but it
sounds a lot like what I saw...

Cheers,

Ingo



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/