sbp2 oops with external ieee1394 burner
Searched and didn't find anything on archives for this, but I probably just missed it. Upgraded from 2.6.8.1 today to 2.6.10, and using my external firewire DVD-RW I get oopsed. I patched to 2.6.11-rc3 and it's still there, I can't speak for 2.6.9 at this point, I can try later if I have to narrow it down. Just wondered if anyone else had this prob? Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: f9aee36b Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: PREEMPT Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: Modules linked in: sg spca50x videodev ath_pci ath_rate_onoe wlan ath_hal ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat iptable_ filter ip_tables ipv6 snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_via82xx snd_ac97_codec snd_pcm snd_timer snd_p age_alloc snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device snd soundcore parport_pc lp parport cls_route cls_u32 cls_fw sch_prio sch_sfq sch_tb f sch_cbq sr_mod sbp2 sd_mod eth1394 r8169 ohci1394 ieee1394 usbhid usb_storage scsi_mod loop pcspkr evdev ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd usb core video Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: CPU:0 Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: EIP:0060:[pg0+962773867/1068745728] Tainted: P VLI Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: EIP:0060:[]Tainted: P VLI Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.11-rc3) Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: EIP is at sbp2util_find_command_for_SCpnt+0x2b/0xb0 [sbp2] Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: eax: 0001 ebx: 0001 ecx: 0001 edx: f742df88 Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: esi: 0086 edi: f6ccdfb4 ebp: f69ca7c0 esp: f6ccdf4c Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: Process scsi_eh_1 (pid: 4417, threadinfo=f6ccd000 task=f6defaa0) Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: Stack: f69ca7c0 f742df00 f6ccdfb4 f6ccdfac f9af0a9b f742df00 f69ca7c0 0206 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel:f69ca7c0 f98849fd f69ca7c0 f69ca7c0 f69ca658 f9884b49 f69ca7c0 f6ccdfe0 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel:f69bb430 0286 f6ccdfac f6ccdfb4 f98857fc f6ccdfb4 f6ccdfac f6defbf4 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: Call Trace: Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+962783899/1068745728] sbp2scsi_abort+0x3b/0xa0 [sbp2] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [] sbp2scsi_abort+0x3b/0xa0 [sbp2] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960244221/1068745728] scsi_try_to_abort_cmd+0x4d/0x90 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [] scsi_try_to_abort_cmd+0x4d/0x90 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960244553/1068745728] scsi_eh_abort_cmds+0x39/0x90 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [] scsi_eh_abort_cmds+0x39/0x90 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960247804/1068745728] scsi_unjam_host+0xbc/0xf0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [] scsi_unjam_host+0xbc/0xf0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960248017/1068745728] scsi_error_handler+0xa1/0xd0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [] scsi_error_handler+0xa1/0xd0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960247856/1068745728] scsi_error_handler+0x0/0xd0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [] scsi_error_handler+0x0/0xd0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [kernel_thread_helper+5/16] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: Code: 55 57 56 53 8b 5c 24 14 8b 6c 24 18 9c 5e fa b8 01 00 00 00 e8 97 b2 62 c6 8b 83 88 00 00 00 8d 93 88 0 0 00 00 39 d0 74 2b 89 c3 <8b> 00 0f 18 00 90 39 da 74 1f bf 00 f0 ff ff 21 e7 8d 74 26 00 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: <6>note: scsi_eh_1[4417] exited with preempt_count 2 -- http://www.skycon.net/ AIM: JasonRStraight ICQ: 1796276 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
sbp2 oops with external ieee1394 burner
Searched and didn't find anything on archives for this, but I probably just missed it. Upgraded from 2.6.8.1 today to 2.6.10, and using my external firewire DVD-RW I get oopsed. I patched to 2.6.11-rc3 and it's still there, I can't speak for 2.6.9 at this point, I can try later if I have to narrow it down. Just wondered if anyone else had this prob? Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: f9aee36b Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: PREEMPT Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: Modules linked in: sg spca50x videodev ath_pci ath_rate_onoe wlan ath_hal ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat iptable_ filter ip_tables ipv6 snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_via82xx snd_ac97_codec snd_pcm snd_timer snd_p age_alloc snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device snd soundcore parport_pc lp parport cls_route cls_u32 cls_fw sch_prio sch_sfq sch_tb f sch_cbq sr_mod sbp2 sd_mod eth1394 r8169 ohci1394 ieee1394 usbhid usb_storage scsi_mod loop pcspkr evdev ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd usb core video Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: CPU:0 Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: EIP:0060:[pg0+962773867/1068745728] Tainted: P VLI Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: EIP:0060:[f9aee36b]Tainted: P VLI Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.11-rc3) Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: EIP is at sbp2util_find_command_for_SCpnt+0x2b/0xb0 [sbp2] Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: eax: 0001 ebx: 0001 ecx: 0001 edx: f742df88 Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: esi: 0086 edi: f6ccdfb4 ebp: f69ca7c0 esp: f6ccdf4c Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Feb 5 07:55:18 jkd kernel: Process scsi_eh_1 (pid: 4417, threadinfo=f6ccd000 task=f6defaa0) Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: Stack: f69ca7c0 f742df00 f6ccdfb4 f6ccdfac f9af0a9b f742df00 f69ca7c0 0206 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel:f69ca7c0 f98849fd f69ca7c0 f69ca7c0 f69ca658 f9884b49 f69ca7c0 f6ccdfe0 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel:f69bb430 0286 f6ccdfac f6ccdfb4 f98857fc f6ccdfb4 f6ccdfac f6defbf4 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: Call Trace: Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+962783899/1068745728] sbp2scsi_abort+0x3b/0xa0 [sbp2] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [f9af0a9b] sbp2scsi_abort+0x3b/0xa0 [sbp2] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960244221/1068745728] scsi_try_to_abort_cmd+0x4d/0x90 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [f98849fd] scsi_try_to_abort_cmd+0x4d/0x90 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960244553/1068745728] scsi_eh_abort_cmds+0x39/0x90 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [f9884b49] scsi_eh_abort_cmds+0x39/0x90 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960247804/1068745728] scsi_unjam_host+0xbc/0xf0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [f98857fc] scsi_unjam_host+0xbc/0xf0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960248017/1068745728] scsi_error_handler+0xa1/0xd0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [f98858d1] scsi_error_handler+0xa1/0xd0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [pg0+960247856/1068745728] scsi_error_handler+0x0/0xd0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [f9885830] scsi_error_handler+0x0/0xd0 [scsi_mod] Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [kernel_thread_helper+5/16] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: [c01012f5] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: Code: 55 57 56 53 8b 5c 24 14 8b 6c 24 18 9c 5e fa b8 01 00 00 00 e8 97 b2 62 c6 8b 83 88 00 00 00 8d 93 88 0 0 00 00 39 d0 74 2b 89 c3 8b 00 0f 18 00 90 39 da 74 1f bf 00 f0 ff ff 21 e7 8d 74 26 00 Feb 5 07:55:19 jkd kernel: 6note: scsi_eh_1[4417] exited with preempt_count 2 -- http://www.skycon.net/ AIM: JasonRStraight ICQ: 1796276 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Bridge Configuration
Could someone guide me to the right (working) place to get the tools for bridge configuration of the kernel? Thanks -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Bridge Configuration
Could someone guide me to the right (working) place to get the tools for bridge configuration of the kernel? Thanks -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Journaled FS on RAID stability..2.4?
On Monday 19 February 2001 15:16, you wrote: > what raid level? > Raid 0 > -Tony > .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. > Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services > > "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" > http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net > .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jason Straight wrote: > > On Monday 19 February 2001 14:58, Admin Mailing Lists wrote: > > > Can anyone give testimonials on a journaled FS on software-raid? > > > I'd like to raid-0 2 SCSI 18Gers, adaptec 2940 u2w controller, kernel > > > 2.4.x. > > > Also pros and cons for reiser-fs/ext3 on this solution would be > > > appreciated > > > > > > Thanx, > > > > > > -Tony > > > .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. > > > Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services > > > > > > "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" > > > http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net > > > .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" > > > in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > > I am running squid on a dual 533 celeron with 4 7200RPM 40GB IBM IDE > > drives, using kernel 2.4.1 and reiserfs for a couple weeks now. Seems > > good - only got 30GB on it right now. > > > > > > > > -- > > Jason Straight -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Journaled FS on RAID stability..2.4?
On Monday 19 February 2001 14:58, Admin Mailing Lists wrote: > Can anyone give testimonials on a journaled FS on software-raid? > I'd like to raid-0 2 SCSI 18Gers, adaptec 2940 u2w controller, kernel > 2.4.x. > Also pros and cons for reiser-fs/ext3 on this solution would be > appreciated > > Thanx, > > -Tony > .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. > Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services > > "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" > http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net > .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ I am running squid on a dual 533 celeron with 4 7200RPM 40GB IBM IDE drives, using kernel 2.4.1 and reiserfs for a couple weeks now. Seems good - only got 30GB on it right now. -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Journaled FS on RAID stability..2.4?
On Monday 19 February 2001 14:58, Admin Mailing Lists wrote: Can anyone give testimonials on a journaled FS on software-raid? I'd like to raid-0 2 SCSI 18Gers, adaptec 2940 u2w controller, kernel 2.4.x. Also pros and cons for reiser-fs/ext3 on this solution would be appreciated Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ I am running squid on a dual 533 celeron with 4 7200RPM 40GB IBM IDE drives, using kernel 2.4.1 and reiserfs for a couple weeks now. Seems good - only got 30GB on it right now. -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Journaled FS on RAID stability..2.4?
On Monday 19 February 2001 15:16, you wrote: what raid level? Raid 0 -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jason Straight wrote: On Monday 19 February 2001 14:58, Admin Mailing Lists wrote: Can anyone give testimonials on a journaled FS on software-raid? I'd like to raid-0 2 SCSI 18Gers, adaptec 2940 u2w controller, kernel 2.4.x. Also pros and cons for reiser-fs/ext3 on this solution would be appreciated Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ I am running squid on a dual 533 celeron with 4 7200RPM 40GB IBM IDE drives, using kernel 2.4.1 and reiserfs for a couple weeks now. Seems good - only got 30GB on it right now. -- Jason Straight -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: (2.4.1-ac15) Wont set using_dma = 1 with hdparm
Doh, I forgot to turn on the DMA options in the kernel. Thanks. Mark Hahn wrote: > you didn't mention what ide controller you're using, > which sort of makes a big difference. with modern kernels, > it shouldn't be necessary to hdparm at all, since you > can select such config at compile time. > >> > > which is normal when you haven't configured the chipset-specific > ide code, and are using generic ide stuff. > > > -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: (2.4.1-ac15) pcmcia irq conflict
Any suggestions of things I could try to help pinpoint the problem and let you know the results? Everything was fine before 2.4.1. I've been using the pcmcia-cs without kernel pcmcia support up until it didn't work with 2.4.1, then I tried using the kernel pcmcia and no deal there either. As soon as I try to start pcmcia my machine freezes. When using yenta_socket I can see that the TI pcmcia and eth0 (intel eepro100) are both on irq 11. when using the pcmcia-cs way of it I tried "exclude irq 11" in config.opts and /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia set "PCIC_OPTS="irq_list=9,10,15 pci_irq_list=9,10,15" as was suggested in this post : http://groups.google.com/groups?q=inspiron+8000+pcmcia+2.4.1=en==off=1=929215370=1 It didn't work for me - at least not with 2.4.1-ac13 to ac15 I didn't disable my minipci ethernet because I need it and if the IRQ's for pcmcia didn't use 11 now I wouldn't think I would need to. Alan Cox wrote: >> I have a Dell Inspiron 8000. Trying to use pcmcia with kernel >> (yenta_socket) or pcmcia-cs only causes pcmcia card to take irq 11, >> which my eth device is on also. This didn't happen with 2.2 or 2.4.0 >> kernels. > > > Sharing a PCI irq is legal, so that isnt the cause. It could be that the > irq routing isnt getting handled correctly however. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(2.4.1-ac15) pcmcia irq conflict
Upgrading from 2.2.18 and 2.4.0 to 2.4.1-ac15 broke pcmcia. I have a Dell Inspiron 8000. Trying to use pcmcia with kernel (yenta_socket) or pcmcia-cs only causes pcmcia card to take irq 11, which my eth device is on also. This didn't happen with 2.2 or 2.4.0 kernels. What param would I pass (how can I specify) to get yenta_socket to take say IRQ 9 or 10 on startup? Thanks -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(2.4.1-ac15) Wont set using_dma = 1 with hdparm
With 2.2.18 I can set using_dma = 1 with hdparm on my Dell Inspiron
8000, I cannot with 2.4.1-ac15, so my HD works about 1/3 the speed with
2.4.1.
[root@jkd junfan]# hdparm -I /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Model=IHATHC_IKD32AB2- 0 , FwRev=000E0A2D,
SerialNo= 11S59T
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=36477, SectSize=579, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?0?
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=39070080
IORDY=yes, tPIO={min:400,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: sdma0 sdma1 sdma2 mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3
*udma4
/dev/hda:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
using_dma= 0 (off)
hdparm v3.9
--
Jason Straight
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(2.4.1-ac15) Wont set using_dma = 1 with hdparm
With 2.2.18 I can set using_dma = 1 with hdparm on my Dell Inspiron
8000, I cannot with 2.4.1-ac15, so my HD works about 1/3 the speed with
2.4.1.
[root@jkd junfan]# hdparm -I /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Model=IHATHC_IKD32AB2- 0 , FwRev=000E0A2D,
SerialNo= 11S59T
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw15uSec Fixed DTR10Mbs }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=36477, SectSize=579, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?0?
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=39070080
IORDY=yes, tPIO={min:400,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: sdma0 sdma1 sdma2 mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3
*udma4
/dev/hda:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
using_dma= 0 (off)
hdparm v3.9
--
Jason Straight
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(2.4.1-ac15) pcmcia irq conflict
Upgrading from 2.2.18 and 2.4.0 to 2.4.1-ac15 broke pcmcia. I have a Dell Inspiron 8000. Trying to use pcmcia with kernel (yenta_socket) or pcmcia-cs only causes pcmcia card to take irq 11, which my eth device is on also. This didn't happen with 2.2 or 2.4.0 kernels. What param would I pass (how can I specify) to get yenta_socket to take say IRQ 9 or 10 on startup? Thanks -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: (2.4.1-ac15) pcmcia irq conflict
Any suggestions of things I could try to help pinpoint the problem and let you know the results? Everything was fine before 2.4.1. I've been using the pcmcia-cs without kernel pcmcia support up until it didn't work with 2.4.1, then I tried using the kernel pcmcia and no deal there either. As soon as I try to start pcmcia my machine freezes. When using yenta_socket I can see that the TI pcmcia and eth0 (intel eepro100) are both on irq 11. when using the pcmcia-cs way of it I tried "exclude irq 11" in config.opts and /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia set "PCIC_OPTS="irq_list=9,10,15 pci_irq_list=9,10,15" as was suggested in this post : http://groups.google.com/groups?q=inspiron+8000+pcmcia+2.4.1hl=enlr=safe=offrnum=1seld=929215370ic=1 It didn't work for me - at least not with 2.4.1-ac13 to ac15 I didn't disable my minipci ethernet because I need it and if the IRQ's for pcmcia didn't use 11 now I wouldn't think I would need to. Alan Cox wrote: I have a Dell Inspiron 8000. Trying to use pcmcia with kernel (yenta_socket) or pcmcia-cs only causes pcmcia card to take irq 11, which my eth device is on also. This didn't happen with 2.2 or 2.4.0 kernels. Sharing a PCI irq is legal, so that isnt the cause. It could be that the irq routing isnt getting handled correctly however. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: (2.4.1-ac15) Wont set using_dma = 1 with hdparm
Doh, I forgot to turn on the DMA options in the kernel. Thanks. Mark Hahn wrote: you didn't mention what ide controller you're using, which sort of makes a big difference. with modern kernels, it shouldn't be necessary to hdparm at all, since you can select such config at compile time. which is normal when you haven't configured the chipset-specific ide code, and are using generic ide stuff. -- Jason Straight - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
neighbour table overflow?
Could someone please explain the reason that this error would occur? I mean the root of the problem ie. what really causes it in the kernel? And then some common laymen reasons that it might be showing up on 2 of my machines that I use as routers? I have searched deja.com and found a few suggestions but nothing seemed to do any good. I get the same message on 2 machines of 3 that have had kernels 2.2.17, 2.2.18, and 2.4.1 on them - no matter what kernel I get the error. I have also tried playing musical network cards but no help there either. Thanks in advance. -- Jason Straight NMO.net Chief Network Engineer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
neighbour table overflow?
Could someone please explain the reason that this error would occur? I mean the root of the problem ie. what really causes it in the kernel? And then some common laymen reasons that it might be showing up on 2 of my machines that I use as routers? I have searched deja.com and found a few suggestions but nothing seemed to do any good. I get the same message on 2 machines of 3 that have had kernels 2.2.17, 2.2.18, and 2.4.1 on them - no matter what kernel I get the error. I have also tried playing musical network cards but no help there either. Thanks in advance. -- Jason Straight NMO.net Chief Network Engineer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)
It may be a filesystem problem, I had a problem like this with a 200GB raid 0 array using reiserfs, it went down 3 times in 2 days. I switched to ext2 on md0 and everything has been fine now for weeks. On Sunday 05 November 2000 16:08, ryan wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried 2.4.0test10, but I get a kernel oops quite often. I have > configured my kernel for raid and smp ... autodetected raid, in the > kernel everything, so no raid modules necessary. But when I go to boot, > it starts to reconstruct the raid array and fsck the /dev/md0 and > eventually it just crashes on me. Kernel oops. A message like: > > "Detected LOCKUP on CPU0" > or sometimes its CPU1... > > If I dont use raid its cool, if I remove smp its also cool. So the > particular combination of raid+smp seems to be the problem. > > My hardware is : > Asus P2B-D, 2 PII-400 > 128 mb ram in 2 * 64 dimms (pc100) > Matrox G400 singlehead. > Enqsonique ENS1371 > Realtek 8029 Ethernet card (ne2k-pci ) > > > I have included my config that causes this problem. > > Incidently mga DRI doesnt work either in either SMP or non-SMP > kernels... it just locks up the console, the system is still running. > maybe I'm missing something? > > My software resembes Debian woody, > gcc --version: > 2.95.2 > > > Hope this helps. > > -ryan > (PS: my raid array is from a 2.2.16 patched with the latest raid patches > for that kernel... debian raidtools2 uses this patch, so its the "latest > one". I'm not sure how relevant this is) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="ryan.config" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: -- Jason Straight - NMO.net Senior Network Tech Penguinfarm.com - Personal Page http://www.penguinfarm.com/ ICQ 1796276 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)
It may be a filesystem problem, I had a problem like this with a 200GB raid 0 array using reiserfs, it went down 3 times in 2 days. I switched to ext2 on md0 and everything has been fine now for weeks. On Sunday 05 November 2000 16:08, ryan wrote: Hi, I tried 2.4.0test10, but I get a kernel oops quite often. I have configured my kernel for raid and smp ... autodetected raid, in the kernel everything, so no raid modules necessary. But when I go to boot, it starts to reconstruct the raid array and fsck the /dev/md0 and eventually it just crashes on me. Kernel oops. A message like: "Detected LOCKUP on CPU0" or sometimes its CPU1... If I dont use raid its cool, if I remove smp its also cool. So the particular combination of raid+smp seems to be the problem. My hardware is : Asus P2B-D, 2 PII-400 128 mb ram in 2 * 64 dimms (pc100) Matrox G400 singlehead. Enqsonique ENS1371 Realtek 8029 Ethernet card (ne2k-pci ) I have included my config that causes this problem. Incidently mga DRI doesnt work either in either SMP or non-SMP kernels... it just locks up the console, the system is still running. maybe I'm missing something? My software resembes Debian woody, gcc --version: 2.95.2 Hope this helps. -ryan (PS: my raid array is from a 2.2.16 patched with the latest raid patches for that kernel... debian raidtools2 uses this patch, so its the "latest one". I'm not sure how relevant this is) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="ryan.config" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: ---- -- Jason Straight - NMO.net Senior Network Tech Penguinfarm.com - Personal Page http://www.penguinfarm.com/ ICQ 1796276 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
