Re: [PATCH 101/104] kernel/gcov: remove depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
(resend after gw issues) Kees Cook wrote on 06.11.2012 00:04:58: > Subject: [PATCH 101/104] kernel/gcov: remove depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL > > The CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL config item has not carried much meaning for a > while now and is almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the > Linux kernel summit, remove it from any "depends on" lines in Kconfigs. > > Cc: WANG Cong > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > --- > kernel/gcov/Kconfig |2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig > index a920281..d4da55d 100644 > --- a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig > +++ b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ config GCOV_KERNEL > config GCOV_PROFILE_ALL > bool "Profile entire Kernel" > depends on GCOV_KERNEL > - depends on SUPERH || S390 || X86 || (PPC && EXPERIMENTAL) || MICROBLAZE > + depends on SUPERH || S390 || X86 || PPC || MICROBLAZE > default n > ---help--- > This options activates profiling for the entire kernel. Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 101/104] kernel/gcov: remove depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
(resend after gw issues) Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org wrote on 06.11.2012 00:04:58: Subject: [PATCH 101/104] kernel/gcov: remove depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL The CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the Linux kernel summit, remove it from any depends on lines in Kconfigs. Cc: WANG Cong xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com Cc: Peter Oberparleiter peter.oberparlei...@de.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org --- kernel/gcov/Kconfig |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig index a920281..d4da55d 100644 --- a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig +++ b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ config GCOV_KERNEL config GCOV_PROFILE_ALL bool Profile entire Kernel depends on GCOV_KERNEL - depends on SUPERH || S390 || X86 || (PPC EXPERIMENTAL) || MICROBLAZE + depends on SUPERH || S390 || X86 || PPC || MICROBLAZE default n ---help--- This options activates profiling for the entire kernel. Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter peter.oberparlei...@de.ibm.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH debugfs: implement symbolic links
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14.02.2007 02:27:32: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:13:54PM +0100, Peter Oberparleiter wrote: > > This function can be useful > > for people moving functionality from /proc to debugfs (e.g. the > > gcov-kernel patch). > > You aren't really creating debugfs symlinks from /sys/kernel/debug/ to > the /proc directory are you? That's pretty insane... Interesting idea :) But I was thinking more along the lines of replacing existing /proc files and symlinks with files and links in debugfs. > Otherwise I have no objection to this, I'll add it to my queue... Great, thanks! Regards, Peter Oberparleiter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH debugfs: implement symbolic links
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 14.02.2007 02:27:32: On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:13:54PM +0100, Peter Oberparleiter wrote: This function can be useful for people moving functionality from /proc to debugfs (e.g. the gcov-kernel patch). You aren't really creating debugfs symlinks from /sys/kernel/debug/ to the /proc directory are you? That's pretty insane... Interesting idea :) But I was thinking more along the lines of replacing existing /proc files and symlinks with files and links in debugfs. Otherwise I have no objection to this, I'll add it to my queue... Great, thanks! Regards, Peter Oberparleiter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
