Re: Kernel SCM saga..
Linus Torvalds wrote: > PS. Don't bother telling me about subversion. If you must, start reading > up on "monotone". That seems to be the most viable alternative, but don't > pester the developers so much that they don't get any work done. They are > already aware of my problems ;) By the way, the Subversion developers have no argument with the claim that Subversion would not be the right choice for Linux kernel development. We've written an open letter entitled "Please Stop Bugging Linus Torvalds About Subversion" to explain why: http://subversion.tigris.org/subversion-linus.html Best, -Karl Fogel (on behalf of the Subversion team) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Kernel SCM saga..
Linus Torvalds wrote: PS. Don't bother telling me about subversion. If you must, start reading up on monotone. That seems to be the most viable alternative, but don't pester the developers so much that they don't get any work done. They are already aware of my problems ;) By the way, the Subversion developers have no argument with the claim that Subversion would not be the right choice for Linux kernel development. We've written an open letter entitled Please Stop Bugging Linus Torvalds About Subversion to explain why: http://subversion.tigris.org/subversion-linus.html Best, -Karl Fogel (on behalf of the Subversion team) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
