[Jesper Juhl - Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 12:17:33AM +0200]
| On 17/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > The patch titled
| > CIFS: check for granted memory
| > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
| > cifs-check-for-granted-memory.patch
| >
| > *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
| >
| > See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
| > out what to do about this
| >
| > --
| > Subject: CIFS: check for granted memory
| > From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >
| > Add a check for granted memory to prevent possible NULL pointer usage.
| >
| > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Cc: Steven French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > ---
| >
| > fs/cifs/sess.c |4
| > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
| >
| > diff -puN fs/cifs/sess.c~cifs-check-for-granted-memory fs/cifs/sess.c
| > --- a/fs/cifs/sess.c~cifs-check-for-granted-memory
| > +++ a/fs/cifs/sess.c
| > @@ -372,6 +372,10 @@ CIFS_SessSetup(unsigned int xid, struct
| >
| > /* 2000 big enough to fit max user, domain, NOS name etc. */
| > str_area = kmalloc(2000, GFP_KERNEL);
| > + if (str_area == NULL) {
| > + cifs_small_buf_release(smb_buf);
| > + return -ENOMEM;
| > + }
|
| The patch, as such, is fine - not arguing against it, but as a matter
| of style; don't we usually prefer the "if (!foo)" form over "if (foo
| == NULL)" ??
I just don't wanna mess 'if (!ptr)' and 'if (ptr == NULL)'
in the procedure. Look at the code ;) Some procs in CIFS
_does_ use '!ptr' but others - 'ptr == NULL'. So in the
proc being patched 'if (ptr == NULL)' is assumed.
|
| --
| Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
| Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
|
Cyrill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
