Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 06:06 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Subject: forcedeth: skb_over_panic > > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8058 > > Submitter : Albert Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Status : unknown > > > I think this is fixed by the recent forcedeth 3-patch patchset? Can > Albert or others confirm? > > Jeff > I'll reflect this in th bug report, but I recently tried the forcedeth driver in 2.6.21-rc3 and still get an oops. -- Albert W. Hopkins - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: forcedeth: skb_over_panic References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8058 Submitter : Albert Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : unknown I think this is fixed by the recent forcedeth 3-patch patchset? Can Albert or others confirm? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: forcedeth: skb_over_panic References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8058 Submitter : Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown I think this is fixed by the recent forcedeth 3-patch patchset? Can Albert or others confirm? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 06:06 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: forcedeth: skb_over_panic References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8058 Submitter : Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown I think this is fixed by the recent forcedeth 3-patch patchset? Can Albert or others confirm? Jeff I'll reflect this in th bug report, but I recently tried the forcedeth driver in 2.6.21-rc3 and still get an oops. -- Albert W. Hopkins - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 19:35 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > Subject: wireless breakage (ipw2200, iwconfig, NetworkManager) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/135 > > Submitter : Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Caused-By : Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (?) > > commit 43cb76d91ee85f579a69d42bc8efc08bac560278 (?) > > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Status : unknown > > I really think this is a CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED issue (not being set), > but want to get Matt confirm either way before saying this is a real > issue or not. I just tested on my quad powermac that also runs a stock Debian/unstable and changing that option makes all the difference. Nevermind that it defaults to yes and one needs to turn it off explicitly... johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 19:35 -0800, Greg KH wrote: Subject: wireless breakage (ipw2200, iwconfig, NetworkManager) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/135 Submitter : Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Greg Kroah-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (?) commit 43cb76d91ee85f579a69d42bc8efc08bac560278 (?) Handled-By : Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown I really think this is a CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED issue (not being set), but want to get Matt confirm either way before saying this is a real issue or not. I just tested on my quad powermac that also runs a stock Debian/unstable and changing that option makes all the difference. Nevermind that it defaults to yes and one needs to turn it off explicitly... johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
Hi Greg, > > >Subject: Bluetooth RFComm locks up the machine (device_move() related) > > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/64 > > >Submitter : Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Caused-By : Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > commit c1a3313698895d8ad4760f98642007bf236af2e8 > > >Status : unknown > > > > A 2-line patch exists for fs/sysfs/dir.c to address this. > > Waiting on Greg to apply it or substitute something prettier. ;) > > I want to see if Marcel agrees with it, as he did the original patch in > that area. I am not deep enough in the sysfs code to tell you if Mark's change it correct or not. It looks however fully reasonable to me. From the higher level perspective of the device_move() usage the RFCOMM code looks correct and has been tested before I submitted it for inclusion. Regards Marcel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
Hi Greg, Subject: Bluetooth RFComm locks up the machine (device_move() related) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/64 Submitter : Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Marcel Holtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] commit c1a3313698895d8ad4760f98642007bf236af2e8 Status : unknown A 2-line patch exists for fs/sysfs/dir.c to address this. Waiting on Greg to apply it or substitute something prettier. ;) I want to see if Marcel agrees with it, as he did the original patch in that area. I am not deep enough in the sysfs code to tell you if Mark's change it correct or not. It looks however fully reasonable to me. From the higher level perspective of the device_move() usage the RFCOMM code looks correct and has been tested before I submitted it for inclusion. Regards Marcel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:01:33PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >Subject: Bluetooth RFComm locks up the machine (device_move() related) > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/64 > >Submitter : Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Caused-By : Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > commit c1a3313698895d8ad4760f98642007bf236af2e8 > >Status : unknown > > A 2-line patch exists for fs/sysfs/dir.c to address this. > Waiting on Greg to apply it or substitute something prettier. ;) I want to see if Marcel agrees with it, as he did the original patch in that area. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: Bluetooth RFComm locks up the machine (device_move() related) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/64 Submitter : Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Caused-By : Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> commit c1a3313698895d8ad4760f98642007bf236af2e8 Status : unknown A 2-line patch exists for fs/sysfs/dir.c to address this. Waiting on Greg to apply it or substitute something prettier. ;) Cheers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:50:31AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject: kref refcounting breakage > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/2/67 > Submitter : Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Handled-By : Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : unknown I'm working on tracking this down still... > Subject: wireless breakage (ipw2200, iwconfig, NetworkManager) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/135 > Submitter : Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (?) > commit 43cb76d91ee85f579a69d42bc8efc08bac560278 (?) > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : unknown I really think this is a CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED issue (not being set), but want to get Matt confirm either way before saying this is a real issue or not. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 02:50:31 +0100 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. We seem to have broken an unusually large amount of stuff this time. partial post-mortem: - The ACPICA merge landed in -mm super-late: basically it was in mainline a week afterwards and saw only a single -mm release. Part of the reason for this short period in -mm was that ACPICA had its paws all over x86_64 code and conflicted badly with significant changes in the x86_64 tree. That happens sometimes. But when it does, the mess lands in my lap rather than in the laps of the perpetrators. Lesson: keep the code well-factored so that different subsystems don't soil each others' kennels. - The hrtimers/dynticks stuff is simply hard: timekeeping, low-level x86, even APICs. These are areas in which things break a lot, so churning it was inevitably going to cause problems. Lesson: none, I think. Low-level x86 support is just hard, and changing it breaks things. So that accounts for _some_ of the damage, but I wonder if there's more to it than that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly involved with one or more of these issues. Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering. Subject: kwin dies silently References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/28/112 Submitter : Sid Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : unknown Subject: resume: slab error in verify_redzone_free(): cache `size-512': memory outside object was overwritten References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/24/41 Submitter : Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : unknown Subject: bluetooth hardlocks References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/2/85 Submitter : Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : unknown Subject: Bluetooth RFComm locks up the machine (device_move() related) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/64 Submitter : Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Caused-By : Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> commit c1a3313698895d8ad4760f98642007bf236af2e8 Status : unknown Subject: kref refcounting breakage References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/2/67 Submitter : Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Handled-By : Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : unknown Subject: wireless breakage (ipw2200, iwconfig, NetworkManager) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/135 Submitter : Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Caused-By : Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (?) commit 43cb76d91ee85f579a69d42bc8efc08bac560278 (?) Handled-By : Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : unknown Subject: forcedeth: skb_over_panic References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8058 Submitter : Albert Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : unknown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly involved with one or more of these issues. Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering. Subject: kwin dies silently References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/28/112 Submitter : Sid Boyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Subject: resume: slab error in verify_redzone_free(): cache `size-512': memory outside object was overwritten References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/24/41 Submitter : Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Subject: bluetooth hardlocks References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/2/85 Submitter : Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Subject: Bluetooth RFComm locks up the machine (device_move() related) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/64 Submitter : Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Marcel Holtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] commit c1a3313698895d8ad4760f98642007bf236af2e8 Status : unknown Subject: kref refcounting breakage References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/2/67 Submitter : Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Subject: wireless breakage (ipw2200, iwconfig, NetworkManager) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/135 Submitter : Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Greg Kroah-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (?) commit 43cb76d91ee85f579a69d42bc8efc08bac560278 (?) Handled-By : Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Subject: forcedeth: skb_over_panic References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8058 Submitter : Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 02:50:31 +0100 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. We seem to have broken an unusually large amount of stuff this time. partial post-mortem: - The ACPICA merge landed in -mm super-late: basically it was in mainline a week afterwards and saw only a single -mm release. Part of the reason for this short period in -mm was that ACPICA had its paws all over x86_64 code and conflicted badly with significant changes in the x86_64 tree. That happens sometimes. But when it does, the mess lands in my lap rather than in the laps of the perpetrators. Lesson: keep the code well-factored so that different subsystems don't soil each others' kennels. - The hrtimers/dynticks stuff is simply hard: timekeeping, low-level x86, even APICs. These are areas in which things break a lot, so churning it was inevitably going to cause problems. Lesson: none, I think. Low-level x86 support is just hard, and changing it breaks things. So that accounts for _some_ of the damage, but I wonder if there's more to it than that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:50:31AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: kref refcounting breakage References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/2/67 Submitter : Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown I'm working on tracking this down still... Subject: wireless breakage (ipw2200, iwconfig, NetworkManager) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/135 Submitter : Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Greg Kroah-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (?) commit 43cb76d91ee85f579a69d42bc8efc08bac560278 (?) Handled-By : Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown I really think this is a CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED issue (not being set), but want to get Matt confirm either way before saying this is a real issue or not. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: Bluetooth RFComm locks up the machine (device_move() related) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/64 Submitter : Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Marcel Holtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] commit c1a3313698895d8ad4760f98642007bf236af2e8 Status : unknown A 2-line patch exists for fs/sysfs/dir.c to address this. Waiting on Greg to apply it or substitute something prettier. ;) Cheers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:01:33PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: Bluetooth RFComm locks up the machine (device_move() related) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/64 Submitter : Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Marcel Holtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] commit c1a3313698895d8ad4760f98642007bf236af2e8 Status : unknown A 2-line patch exists for fs/sysfs/dir.c to address this. Waiting on Greg to apply it or substitute something prettier. ;) I want to see if Marcel agrees with it, as he did the original patch in that area. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
