Re: [Cocci] [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missingput_device()
>>> We don't need perfection. >> >> I guess that you noticed in the meantime that I dare to propose >> more software development efforts in such a direction. > > Yes, this is noticable. I am curious then if remaining change suggestions will be picked up by more software developers and reviewers. > It is your choice, however, other people may have their reasons > for other choices... Yes, of course. >>> We need more to eliminate the memory leaks. > > ... like this one. > >> Will this view evolve into further helpful and constructive clarifications? > > Given my above, what is the evaluation of the same question to yourself? * I hope that my contributions can improve the situation also for this software area. * Existing development tools will evolve further as usual. Regards, Markus
Re: [Cocci] [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missingput_device()
Hi, On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 09:57:54AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > We don't need perfection. > > I guess that you noticed in the meantime that I dare to propose > more software development efforts in such a direction. Yes, this is noticable. It is your choice, however, other people may have their reasons for other choices... > > We need more to eliminate the memory leaks. ... like this one. > Will this view evolve into further helpful and constructive clarifications? Given my above, what is the evaluation of the same question to yourself? Regards, Wolfram signature.asc Description: PGP signature
