Re: [LKP] Commit ac3ebafa81a makes NHM EX/EP machines hung out since 3.9-rc1
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 09:02:47 AM Alex Shi wrote: > On 03/28/2013 08:40 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > > >> > It fixes the problem on my 8 sockets Nehalem-EX that will hang around > >> > ip_auto_config() > >> > > >> > Tested-by: Yinghai Lu > >> > > >> > Rafael, > >> > Can you please push this one to Linus tree ? > >> > As the offending patch was via your tree to upstream. > > I will if there's no better way to address this issue before -rc6. > > If it can be pushed to upstream, please add: > > Reported-by: LKP project > Reported-by: Xie ChanglongX I have applied the patch, but I've modified the changelog. Please check the linux-next branch of my tree and see if the commit is what you meant. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [LKP] Commit ac3ebafa81a makes NHM EX/EP machines hung out since 3.9-rc1
On 03/28/2013 08:40 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > >> > It fixes the problem on my 8 sockets Nehalem-EX that will hang around >> > ip_auto_config() >> > >> > Tested-by: Yinghai Lu >> > >> > Rafael, >> > Can you please push this one to Linus tree ? >> > As the offending patch was via your tree to upstream. > I will if there's no better way to address this issue before -rc6. If it can be pushed to upstream, please add: Reported-by: LKP project Reported-by: Xie ChanglongX -- Thanks Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [LKP] Commit ac3ebafa81a makes NHM EX/EP machines hung out since 3.9-rc1
On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 09:36:44 AM Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Alex Shi wrote: > > On 03/13/2013 10:27 AM, Changlong Xie wrote: > >> Hi Len, > >> > >> FYI, since 3.9-rc1 our three NHM EP/EX LKP(linux kernel performance) > >> test servers > >> except SNB/IVB/WSM hung up unexpectly. > >> > >> We did git bisect for about 8 times on all servers, it said that the > >> first bad commit is ac3ebafa. > >> > >> commit ac3ebafa81af76d65e4fb45c6388f08e90ddcc6d > >> Author: Daniel Lezcano > >> Date: Mon Feb 4 22:44:43 2013 + > > > > fixing patch for review: > > > > > > --- > > From 78a74aea386b0969909c2e4ae388024ce71fdb18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Alex Shi > > Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:57:47 +0800 > > Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle/acpi: recover percpu acpi processor cstate > > > > Commit: ac3ebafa81af76d6 "ACPI / idle: remove usage of the statedata" > > change the percpu processor cstate to a unify unique cstate in acpi > > idle. That cause all our NHM box boot hang or panic. > > > > 2178751 Task dump for CPU 1:^M > > 2178752 swapper/1 R running task 6736 0 1 > > 0x^M > > 2178753 8801e8029dc8 8101cf96 8801e8029e28 > > 813d294b^M > > 2178754 0f99 0003 003cf654 > > 25c17d03^M > > 2178755 8801e8029e38 8801e74fc000 0002590dc5c4 > > 8163cdb0^M > > 2178756 Call Trace:^M > > 2178757 [] ? > > acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter+0x2d/0x2f^M > > 2178758 [] acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x1b1/0x236^M > > 2178759 [] ? disable_cpuidle+0x10/0x10^M > > 2178760 [] cpuidle_enter+0x12/0x14^M > > 2178761 [] cpuidle_wrap_enter+0x2f/0x6d^M > > 2178762 [] cpuidle_enter_tk+0x10/0x12^M > > 2178763 [] cpuidle_enter_state+0x12/0x3a^M > > 2178764 [] cpuidle_idle_call+0xe8/0x161^M > > 2178765 [] cpu_idle+0x5e/0xa4^M > > 2178766 [] start_secondary+0x1a9/0x1ad^M > > 2178767 Task dump for CPU 2:^M > > > > In fact, the acpi idle bases on percpu cstate difference assumption, the > > infrastructure use many percpu structures to implement self. > > Just unique acpi_processor_cx is far far not enough. > > > > This patch just is a quick fix by introducing back the percpu cstates. > > And keep driver_data away. > > > > If someone really want to unify the acpi cstates, please make sure whole > > software infrastructure changed and get the grant from hardware, > > include many kinds of BIOS setting. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi > > --- > > drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 13 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > > index fc95308..ee255c6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > > @@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ module_param(latency_factor, uint, 0644); > > > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device *, acpi_cpuidle_device); > > > > -static struct acpi_processor_cx *acpi_cstate[CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX]; > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor_cx * [CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX], > > + > > acpi_cstate); > > > > static int disabled_by_idle_boot_param(void) > > { > > @@ -722,7 +723,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_c1(struct cpuidle_device > > *dev, > > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index) > > { > > struct acpi_processor *pr; > > - struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = acpi_cstate[index]; > > + struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = per_cpu(acpi_cstate[index], > > dev->cpu); > > > > pr = __this_cpu_read(processors); > > > > @@ -745,7 +746,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_c1(struct cpuidle_device > > *dev, > > */ > > static int acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index) > > { > > - struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = acpi_cstate[index]; > > + struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = per_cpu(acpi_cstate[index], > > dev->cpu); > > > > ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE(); > > > > @@ -775,7 +776,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device > > *dev, > > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index) > > { > > struct acpi_processor *pr; > > - struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = acpi_cstate[index]; > > + struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = per_cpu(acpi_cstate[index], > > dev->cpu); > > > > pr = __this_cpu_read(processors); > > > > @@ -833,7 +834,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device > > *dev, > > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index) > > { > > struct acpi_processor *pr; > > - struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = acpi_cstate[index]; > > + struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = per_cpu(acpi_cstate[index], > > dev->cpu); > > > > pr = __this_cpu_read(processors); > > > > @@ -960,7 +961,7
Re: [LKP] Commit ac3ebafa81a makes NHM EX/EP machines hung out since 3.9-rc1
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Alex Shi wrote: > On 03/13/2013 10:27 AM, Changlong Xie wrote: >> Hi Len, >> >> FYI, since 3.9-rc1 our three NHM EP/EX LKP(linux kernel performance) >> test servers >> except SNB/IVB/WSM hung up unexpectly. >> >> We did git bisect for about 8 times on all servers, it said that the >> first bad commit is ac3ebafa. >> >> commit ac3ebafa81af76d65e4fb45c6388f08e90ddcc6d >> Author: Daniel Lezcano >> Date: Mon Feb 4 22:44:43 2013 + > > fixing patch for review: > > > --- > From 78a74aea386b0969909c2e4ae388024ce71fdb18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Alex Shi > Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:57:47 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle/acpi: recover percpu acpi processor cstate > > Commit: ac3ebafa81af76d6 "ACPI / idle: remove usage of the statedata" > change the percpu processor cstate to a unify unique cstate in acpi > idle. That cause all our NHM box boot hang or panic. > > 2178751 Task dump for CPU 1:^M > 2178752 swapper/1 R running task 6736 0 1 > 0x^M > 2178753 8801e8029dc8 8101cf96 8801e8029e28 > 813d294b^M > 2178754 0f99 0003 003cf654 > 25c17d03^M > 2178755 8801e8029e38 8801e74fc000 0002590dc5c4 > 8163cdb0^M > 2178756 Call Trace:^M > 2178757 [] ? > acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter+0x2d/0x2f^M > 2178758 [] acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x1b1/0x236^M > 2178759 [] ? disable_cpuidle+0x10/0x10^M > 2178760 [] cpuidle_enter+0x12/0x14^M > 2178761 [] cpuidle_wrap_enter+0x2f/0x6d^M > 2178762 [] cpuidle_enter_tk+0x10/0x12^M > 2178763 [] cpuidle_enter_state+0x12/0x3a^M > 2178764 [] cpuidle_idle_call+0xe8/0x161^M > 2178765 [] cpu_idle+0x5e/0xa4^M > 2178766 [] start_secondary+0x1a9/0x1ad^M > 2178767 Task dump for CPU 2:^M > > In fact, the acpi idle bases on percpu cstate difference assumption, the > infrastructure use many percpu structures to implement self. > Just unique acpi_processor_cx is far far not enough. > > This patch just is a quick fix by introducing back the percpu cstates. > And keep driver_data away. > > If someone really want to unify the acpi cstates, please make sure whole > software infrastructure changed and get the grant from hardware, > include many kinds of BIOS setting. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi > --- > drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 13 +++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > index fc95308..ee255c6 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > @@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ module_param(latency_factor, uint, 0644); > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device *, acpi_cpuidle_device); > > -static struct acpi_processor_cx *acpi_cstate[CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX]; > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor_cx * [CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX], > + acpi_cstate); > > static int disabled_by_idle_boot_param(void) > { > @@ -722,7 +723,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_c1(struct cpuidle_device *dev, > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index) > { > struct acpi_processor *pr; > - struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = acpi_cstate[index]; > + struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = per_cpu(acpi_cstate[index], dev->cpu); > > pr = __this_cpu_read(processors); > > @@ -745,7 +746,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_c1(struct cpuidle_device *dev, > */ > static int acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index) > { > - struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = acpi_cstate[index]; > + struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = per_cpu(acpi_cstate[index], dev->cpu); > > ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE(); > > @@ -775,7 +776,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device > *dev, > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index) > { > struct acpi_processor *pr; > - struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = acpi_cstate[index]; > + struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = per_cpu(acpi_cstate[index], dev->cpu); > > pr = __this_cpu_read(processors); > > @@ -833,7 +834,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev, > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index) > { > struct acpi_processor *pr; > - struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = acpi_cstate[index]; > + struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = per_cpu(acpi_cstate[index], dev->cpu); > > pr = __this_cpu_read(processors); > > @@ -960,7 +961,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx(struct > acpi_processor *pr, > !(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_C2_MP_SUPPORTED)) > continue; > #endif > - acpi_cstate[count] = cx; > + per_cpu(acpi_cstate[count], dev->cpu) = cx; > > count++; >