The ARM dma_supported() is rather basic, and I don't think it takes into account everything that it should do (eg, whether the mask agrees with what we'd return for GFP_DMA allocations). Note this.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x '*.orig' -x '*.rej' -r orig/include/asm-arm/dma-mapping.h linux/include/asm-arm/dma-mapping.h --- orig/include/asm-arm/dma-mapping.h Wed Jan 12 10:13:19 2005 +++ linux/include/asm-arm/dma-mapping.h Fri Jun 18 17:56:02 2004 @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ extern void consistent_sync(void *kaddr, * properly. For example, if your device can only drive the low 24-bits * during bus mastering, then you would pass 0x00ffffff as the mask * to this function. + * + * FIXME: This should really be a platform specific issue - we should + * return false if GFP_DMA allocations may not satisfy the supplied 'mask'. */ static inline int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) { - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/